Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (893)
- University of Michigan Law School (808)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (795)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (645)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (399)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (373)
- William & Mary Law School (343)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (331)
- University of Richmond (285)
- Seattle University School of Law (275)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (231)
- University of Washington School of Law (229)
- BLR (220)
- Columbia Law School (202)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (201)
- University of Kentucky (192)
- UIC School of Law (187)
- Mercer University School of Law (182)
- West Virginia University (182)
- American University Washington College of Law (179)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (155)
- Cornell University Law School (144)
- University of Colorado Law School (142)
- Brooklyn Law School (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (130)
- Pepperdine University (127)
- University of Maine School of Law (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (123)
- University of Miami Law School (114)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (107)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (688)
- Criminal law (546)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (466)
- Criminal Procedure (391)
- Evidence (351)
-
- Capital punishment (286)
- Police (285)
- Death penalty (275)
- Sentencing (274)
- Fourth Amendment (270)
- Sixth Amendment (270)
- Criminal justice (269)
- Criminal Law (236)
- United States Supreme Court (236)
- Due process (231)
- Constitutional Law (224)
- Supreme Court (207)
- Fifth Amendment (206)
- Right to counsel (167)
- Constitution (154)
- New York (149)
- Jury (136)
- Prosecutors (135)
- Punishment (133)
- Juries (132)
- Testimony (129)
- Privacy (128)
- Constitutional law (125)
- Federal (125)
- Fourth amendment (124)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (760)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Michigan Law Review (462)
- Articles (383)
- Touro Law Review (350)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (328)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (302)
- Faculty Publications (262)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (224)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (218)
- ExpressO (195)
- Buffalo Law Review (189)
- University of Richmond Law Review (188)
- West Virginia Law Review (179)
- Mercer Law Review (173)
- Capital Defense Journal (168)
- Kentucky Law Journal (165)
- Washington Law Review (160)
- UIC Law Review (153)
- Publications (133)
- Scholarly Articles (131)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (127)
- Maine Law Review (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (121)
- Scholarly Works (114)
- Pepperdine Law Review (111)
- All Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 10981 - 11010 of 12089
Full-Text Articles in Law
Law Enforcement Control: Checks And Balances For The Police System, Mark Berger
Law Enforcement Control: Checks And Balances For The Police System, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Indigent's Right To A Transcript Of Record, Larry Yackle
The Indigent's Right To A Transcript Of Record, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
There is no more fascinating subject in the field of federal constitutional law than the relationship between due process and equal protection, concepts brought together in the fourteenth amendment. Governmental action that is fundamentally unfair and a denial of due process may also involve discriminatory treatment and a denial of equal protection.' Accordingly, in a number of cases the distinction between the two concepts has been blurred. In Douglas v. California, the Supreme Court held that on first appeal counsel must be furnished to indigents at state expense because the failure to provide professional representation is both fundamentally unfair and …
Plea Bargaining: The Case For Reform
Plea Bargaining: The Case For Reform
University of Richmond Law Review
Although plea bargaining has not been openly recognized or sanctioned by most courts, it has become quite widespread and effective. Due to this lack of formal recognition, no uniform plea bargaining procedure has been developed, but generally, an accused is encouraged to plead guilty in exchange for some concession, the most familiar being a promise by the prosecutor to ask the court for leniency. Such concession is far from being the only "reward" offered by the state; indeed, if it were the only one, the practice would not have flourished as it has. Depending upon the particular laws of the …
Federal Court Intervention In Pending State Criminal Prosecutions- The Significance Of Younger V. Harris
University of Richmond Law Review
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of Younger v. Harris along with its companion cases represent the most significant development in the area of federal-state court relations since the Court decided Dombrowski v. Pfister in 1965. Dombrowski created grave doubts over the continued validity of the long established public policy against federal court interference with state court proceedings. Civil libertarians were quick to seize upon the broad assertions in that case as support for their efforts toward expanding the concept of federal court intervention in state criminal prosecutions. Though the Court was given the opportunity to reconcile the conflicting …
Deadlocked Juries-The "Allen Charge" Is Defuse
Deadlocked Juries-The "Allen Charge" Is Defuse
University of Richmond Law Review
A deadlocked jury remains an ever-present problem to a judge whose docket is filled with cases to be litigated. Throughout history, crude methods of coercion have been -employed by judges to pry a verdict from a deadlocked jury. While such methods have long since been abandoned, a more subtle, though equally effective, device known as the "Allen charge" is still utilized today to bring about the same result.
Criminal Procedure- Virginia's Limited Use Of A Two-Trial System
Criminal Procedure- Virginia's Limited Use Of A Two-Trial System
University of Richmond Law Review
It has long been the general assumption in criminal cases in the United States that the fair trial provided for by the Federal Constitution contemplates a unitary one wherein all of the issues are deliberated within a single proceeding, with verdict, and punishment if any, in the form of a single pronouncement. A recent Virginia case, however, has held that the issues of guilt and punishment are severable and may be tried separately where particular circumstances exist.
Cross-Sex Supervision In The Probation And After-Care Service, Phyllida Parsloe
Cross-Sex Supervision In The Probation And After-Care Service, Phyllida Parsloe
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
An Introduction To Virginia's New Rules Of Criminal Practice And Procedure, Murray J. Janus
An Introduction To Virginia's New Rules Of Criminal Practice And Procedure, Murray J. Janus
University of Richmond Law Review
On January 1, 1972 the new Virginia Rules of Criminal Practice and Procedure became effective, some three and one-half years after the President of the Virginia State Bar Association appointed a Special Committee to draft these proposed Rules. Mr. Justice Thomas C. Gordon, Jr., was appointed Chairman of the Committee in June of 1968. Peter C. Manson, Professor of Criminal Law at the University ,of.Virginia,acted as consultant for the Committee and he made available special student assistants who were invaluable with their research. In addition, two judges of courts of record with criminal jurisdiction, the Honorable Edmund P. Simpkins, Jr., …
Recent Legislation, J. Rodney Johnson
Recent Legislation, J. Rodney Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
The 1972 session of the General Assembly was especially active in the areas of wills, trusts, and estates. Much of this legislation deals with fine points not affecting the average lawyer in his practice. However, the following items of legislation should be of general interest to the attorney whose practice involves probate work or estate planning, even though he does not hold himself out as a specialist in these areas.
Bail And Bail Bondsmen: Need For Reform In Kentucky, Frank Stainback
Bail And Bail Bondsmen: Need For Reform In Kentucky, Frank Stainback
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Primary Requirements For The Application Of The Federal Writ Of Habeas Corpus And Its Problem Areas., L. Vance Stanton
Primary Requirements For The Application Of The Federal Writ Of Habeas Corpus And Its Problem Areas., L. Vance Stanton
St. Mary's Law Journal
Applications for issuance of writs of habeas corpus are among the most frequently filed petitions in federal courts. The substantial number of applications may be attributed to the fact that habeas corpus can be the fastest and most effective method which the law provides to insure an individual’s liberty. However, there are still areas within its framework that are unsettled. Specifically, there are two primary unsettled problems existing in federal habeas corpus proceedings, which include the certificate of probable cause and whether the federal rules apply to habeas corpus proceedings. The primary purpose of this article is to explain the …
A Study In The Treatment Of Crime And Law Enforcement In The United States As Compared To The European Countries., George E. Glos
A Study In The Treatment Of Crime And Law Enforcement In The United States As Compared To The European Countries., George E. Glos
St. Mary's Law Journal
The United States holds a comparably higher crime rate than European countries in the area of homicide, aggravated assault, robbery, burglary, and incitation of riots. This article explores the differences existing in the treatment of serious crimes in the leading systems of criminal law and law enforcement. This study examines how the United States, compared with European countries, define subcategories of major crimes and establish the penalties, defenses, and the access to relief attached to each crime. Contrasted with the provisions of the various states of the United States, the European provisions are simpler and carry stiffer penalties. The object …
Juvenile Courts--Juveniles In Delinquency Proceedings Are Not Constitutionally Entitled To The Right Of Trial By Jury--Mckeiver V. Pennsylvania, Michigan Law Review
Juvenile Courts--Juveniles In Delinquency Proceedings Are Not Constitutionally Entitled To The Right Of Trial By Jury--Mckeiver V. Pennsylvania, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
At a hearing in the juvenile court of Philadelphia in October 1968, Joseph McKeiver was declared a "delinquent child" and placed on probation by a juvenile court judge who determined that McKeiver had violated a Pennsylvania law. The juvenile court petition charged McKeiver, then sixteen years old, with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods as the result of an incident in which McKeiver and twenty or thirty other youths took twenty-five cents from three teenagers. Despite the fact that the evidence against McKeiver consisted primarily of the weak and inconsistent testimony of two of the victims, the juvenile court judge, …
Argersinger V. Hamlin, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Argersinger V. Hamlin, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Sarno V. Illinois Crime Investigating Commission, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Sarno V. Illinois Crime Investigating Commission, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Kastigar V. United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Kastigar V. United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Brewster, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Brewster, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Shadwick V. Tampa, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Apodoca V. Oregon, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Apodoca V. Oregon, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Kirby V. Illinois, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Kois V. Wisconsin, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Traditional Criminal Procedure In Ethiopia, Stanley Z. Fisher
Traditional Criminal Procedure In Ethiopia, Stanley Z. Fisher
Faculty Scholarship
In the decade 1955-1965 the Ethiopian government completely revolutionized its legal system by promulgating comprehensive legal codes and a new constitution. These laws have a predominantly Western flavor, and seem to bear little relation to the traditional patterns of life which still prevail in the Empire-one of the least "developed" areas of Africa. This state of affairs has led some to characterize the new codes as "fantasy law," which may serve to put a modern "face" on the country but, at least for some time to come, will not have any serious impact on the conduct of its affairs.
Criminal Procedure—Juveniles: Retroactive Application Of In Re Gault Denied In Washington—Brumley V. Charles Denny Juvenile Center, 77 Wn.2d 702, 466 P.2d 481 (1970), Anon
Washington Law Review
Genevieve Fay Brumley was adjudged a delinquent child by the juvenile court of Snohomish County on December 12, 1966 after she admitted telephoning bomb threats to local schools. Present at the adjudicatory hearing were court personnel, her parents, a welfare caseworker, a probation officer, and a policeman. She was not represented by counsel. During her subsequent incarceration, the United States Supreme Court extended the right to counsel to juvenile proceedings in In re Gault. In August of 1968, Miss Brumley petitioned the superior court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the Gault decision required a reversal of her …
Can We Afford To Provide Trial Counsel For The Indigent In Misdemeanor Cases?, Junius L. Allison, Jack L. Phelps
Can We Afford To Provide Trial Counsel For The Indigent In Misdemeanor Cases?, Junius L. Allison, Jack L. Phelps
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law--Indigent's Payment For Depositions, Joseph Wagoner
Criminal Law--Indigent's Payment For Depositions, Joseph Wagoner
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prior Convictions As Impeaching Evidence
Prior Convictions As Impeaching Evidence
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure And Joint Searches
The Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure And Joint Searches
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Invoking Summary Criminal Contempt Procedures--Use Of Abuse? United States V. Dellinger --The "Chicago Seven" Contempts, Michigan Law Review
Invoking Summary Criminal Contempt Procedures--Use Of Abuse? United States V. Dellinger --The "Chicago Seven" Contempts, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In late August of 1968, while delegates to the Democratic National Convention were arriving in Chicago, a group of several thousand demonstrators gathered in the city's Lincoln Park to protest the Convention, the Vietnam War, and the city's refusal to grant the group a permit to hold rallies and marches during the Convention. The week that followed was marred by violent confrontations between the demonstrators and the city's police.1 This violence in Chicago provided the impetus for an indictment by a federal grand jury of the defendants in United States v. Dellinger.
Habeas Corpus--Applicability Of Doctrine Of Res Judicata
Habeas Corpus--Applicability Of Doctrine Of Res Judicata
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law--Speedy Trial--The Three Term Rule, Stephen P. Swisher
Criminal Law--Speedy Trial--The Three Term Rule, Stephen P. Swisher
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.