Law Commons^™

Hurtado V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Gagnon V. Scarpelli, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

United States V. Orito, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Almeida-Sanchez V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Schneckloth V. Bustamonte, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Palmore V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

United States V. Dionisio, Lewis Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Use Of The Income Tax Return In Unrelated Criminal Prosecutions: Garner V. United States

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Pauper--Short-Changed At The Jury Box, Jeffrey J. Yost

West Virginia Law Review

Fear of governmental domination prompted the founders of the United States to restrict governmental interference with individual liberties. Indeed, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to prohibit tampering with preferred freedoms. One such prohibition is that no citizen can be deprived of his life, liberty or property solely upon governmental accusations. Such deprivation can follow only after determination of guilt by a jury of the individual's peers. However, West Virginia statutorily denies paupers this fundamental right to a trial by their peers. This denial constitutes an invidious discrimination violative of the equal protection clause of the Constitution.

Out-Of-State Witnesses And Compulsory Process: The Indigent Defendant's Rights

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Reconsideration Of Limiting Perjury Prosecutions By Collateral Estoppel

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Miller V. California, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure—Right To Counsel In Investigative Grand Jury Proceedings: Washington Criminal Investigatory Act Of 1971—R.C.W. §§ 10.27.120-.140 (1971), Anon

Washington Law Review

The Criminal Investigatory Act's provision for counsel appears justified when one considers the witness' delicate position and recent extensions of the right to counsel at other stages of the criminal process. Washington's statute, however, is a significant departure from grand jury protections provided in other jurisdictions because it provides for the presence of counsel as a matter of right. This note examines the policy basis for Washington's statute and the effect this additional protection for the witness may have on the investigative efficiency of the grand jury.

Rehabilitation And Occupational Licensing: A Conflict Of Interests, Brian Bromberger

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

RECENT CASES

Antitrust--Sham Exception--Allegations of Purposeful and Concerted Use of Adjudicatory Processes to Harass and Deter Parties From Having Free Access to These Processes Constitute a Cause of Action Under Antitrust Laws

====================

Criminal Procedure--Confessions--Determination of Confession's Voluntariness by Preponderance of the Evidence Is Not Violative of Fifth Amendment Prohibition Against Self-Incrimination

====================

Landlord and Tenant--Forcible Entry and Detainer Statute--Provisions for Immediate Trial and Limitation of Triable Issues Not Violative of Due Process or Equal-Protection Clauses

=====================

Securities Regulation-Section 16(b) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934--Insider May Sell Enough Stock To Bring His Holdings Below Ten Percent and Within Six …

Grand Jury Witness Has Standing As An Aggrieved Person And May Suppress Evidence Obtained As A Result Of An Illegal Wiretap., Terrence W. Mcdonald

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Trial Procedure - Bombshell Instruction For Deadlocked Juries: Aba Standard Replaces Allen Charge In District Of Columbia. United States V. Thomas, 449 F.2d 1177 (D.C. Cir. 1971), J. Grant Corboy

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Jurisdiction - In The Absence Of Bad Faith Harassment By State Authorities, The Mere Showing Of A Chilling Effect On First Amendment Freedoms Held Insufficient To Warrant A Federal Injunction Staying State Criminal Proceedings, Robert W. Sheppy

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Admissibility Of Polygraph Results In Criminal Trials: A Case For The Status Quo, Lee J. Radek

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Miranda Warnings In Other Than Police Custodial Interrogations, Marvin E. Sable

Cleveland State Law Review

The court, in Miranda, was quick to point out, however, that the decision in that case did not suppose to vitiate the confession as a tool of law enforcement officers in ferretting out criminals. Likewise, volunteered statements of any kind were specifically exempted from the exclusionary rule that was applied to Miranda-type admissions only. Much of the progeny of Miranda addressed itself to just such types of admissions. Oftentimes, the courts dissected the seemingly unitized custodial interrogation requirement of Miranda by turning their decisions of its inapplicability upon the absence of either the "custody" or the "interrogation" aspect

Self-Incrimination: Choosing A Constitutional Immunity Standard - Kastigar V. United States

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Search And Seizure - Fourth Amendment Vagueness - Evidence Excluded When Obtained By Search Incident To Vagrancy Arrest Under Statute Previously Held Void For Vagueness, Allen C. Warshaw

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

An Eclectic Approach To Impeachment By Prior Convictions, Lawrence A. Margolis

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Almost every state permits persons convicted of a crime to testify in either their own or another person's behalf. Nonetheless, these states allow evidence of a person's prior criminal conviction to be used to impeach his credibility. The use of this method of impeachment in criminal trials has been the subject of substantial adverse criticism; yet, the practice remains widespread. This article first will discuss the problems that arise from the use of prior conviction evidence for impeachment purposes in criminal trials and then will examine several proposals that would restrict the use of such evidence. Finally, the article will …

Speedy Trial And The Congested Trial Calendar, Christopher L. Blakesley

Scholarly Works

In People v. Ganci, the defendant had been indicted for robbery, larceny, and assault while serving a prison sentence for another conviction. Five and one-half months after his indictment he moved, pursuant to section 668 of the New York Code of Criminal Procedure, to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Eleven months later, sixteen months after the indictment, he was brought to trial, convicted, and sentenced. On appeal, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department affirmed, whereupon the defendant appealed by permission to the New York Court of Appeals. On this appeal he contended that the delay deprived …

Excessive Delay In The Courts: Toward A Continuance Policy Relating To Counsel And Parties, Thomas O. Gorman

Cleveland State Law Review

The maxim "Justice delayed is justice denied" is an expression which is becoming all too meaningful in our courts today. Many of the large metropolitan courts in this country are being strangled by the ever-increasing backlog of cases. ...In most court systems, continuance policies are either non-existent or couched in vague terms such as "good cause shown.' It is the aim of this study to formulate guidelines for a sound continuance policy which will serve to speed the administration of justice without interfering with the high standard of judicial fairness necessary to proper adjudication.

Societal Concepts Of Criminal Liability For Homicide In Medieval England, Thomas A. Green

Articles

THE early history of English criminal law lies hidden behind the laconic formulas of the rolls and law books. The rules of the law, as expounded by the judges, have been the subject of many studies; but their practical application in the courts, where the jury of the community was the final and unbridled arbiter, remains a mystery: in short, we know little of the social mores regarding crime and crimi- nals. This study represents an attempt to delineate one major aspect of these societal attitudes. Its thesis is that from late Anglo-Saxon times to the end of the middle …

Police Field Citations In New Haven, Mark Berger

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.