Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (893)
- University of Michigan Law School (808)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (795)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (645)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (399)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (373)
- William & Mary Law School (344)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (331)
- University of Richmond (288)
- Seattle University School of Law (275)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (231)
- University of Washington School of Law (229)
- BLR (220)
- Columbia Law School (203)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (201)
- University of Kentucky (192)
- UIC School of Law (187)
- Mercer University School of Law (182)
- West Virginia University (182)
- American University Washington College of Law (179)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (155)
- Cornell University Law School (144)
- University of Colorado Law School (142)
- Brooklyn Law School (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (130)
- Pepperdine University (127)
- University of Maine School of Law (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (123)
- University of Miami Law School (115)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (107)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (688)
- Criminal law (547)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (441)
- Criminal Procedure (389)
- Evidence (348)
-
- Capital punishment (286)
- Police (285)
- Death penalty (275)
- Sentencing (274)
- Criminal justice (271)
- Fourth Amendment (269)
- Sixth Amendment (267)
- Criminal Law (236)
- United States Supreme Court (236)
- Due process (231)
- Constitutional Law (219)
- Supreme Court (207)
- Fifth Amendment (204)
- Right to counsel (167)
- Constitution (154)
- New York (149)
- Prosecutors (135)
- Jury (134)
- Juries (132)
- Testimony (129)
- Privacy (128)
- Punishment (126)
- Constitutional law (125)
- Federal (125)
- Fourth amendment (124)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (762)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Michigan Law Review (462)
- Articles (383)
- Touro Law Review (350)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (328)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (302)
- Faculty Publications (263)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (224)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (218)
- ExpressO (195)
- University of Richmond Law Review (190)
- Buffalo Law Review (189)
- West Virginia Law Review (179)
- Mercer Law Review (173)
- Capital Defense Journal (168)
- Kentucky Law Journal (165)
- Washington Law Review (160)
- UIC Law Review (153)
- Publications (133)
- Scholarly Articles (131)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (127)
- Maine Law Review (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (121)
- Scholarly Works (114)
- Pepperdine Law Review (111)
- All Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 10081 - 10110 of 12093
Full-Text Articles in Law
Expert Testimony In Child Sexual Abuse Cases, Rebecca J. Roe
Expert Testimony In Child Sexual Abuse Cases, Rebecca J. Roe
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
See No Evil? Can Insulation Of Child Sexual Abuse Victims Be Accomplished Without Endangering The Defendant's Constitutional Rights?, Wallace J. Mlyniec, Michelle M. Dally
See No Evil? Can Insulation Of Child Sexual Abuse Victims Be Accomplished Without Endangering The Defendant's Constitutional Rights?, Wallace J. Mlyniec, Michelle M. Dally
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Diagnostic Evaluations And The Use Of Videotapes In Child Sexual Abuse Cases, Kee Macfarlane
Diagnostic Evaluations And The Use Of Videotapes In Child Sexual Abuse Cases, Kee Macfarlane
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Child Sexual Assault: Children's Memory And The Law, Gail S. Goodman, Vicki S. Helgeson
Child Sexual Assault: Children's Memory And The Law, Gail S. Goodman, Vicki S. Helgeson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Competency Requirement For The Child Victim Of Sexual Abuse: Must We Abandon It?, Robin W. Morey
The Competency Requirement For The Child Victim Of Sexual Abuse: Must We Abandon It?, Robin W. Morey
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Bowers V. Hardwick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Bowers V. Hardwick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Kuhlmann V. Wilson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Kuhlmann V. Wilson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Meritor Savings Bank, Fsb V. Vinson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Meritor Savings Bank, Fsb V. Vinson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Thornburgh V. American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Thornburgh V. American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
New Mexico V. Earnest, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
New Mexico V. Earnest, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Inadi, Lewis F. Powell Jr
United States V. Inadi, Lewis F. Powell Jr
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Smith V. Murray, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Murray V. Carrier, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Criminal Procedure—Veiled References To Failure Of Defendant To Testify Constitutes Reversible Error, Craig Lambert
Criminal Procedure—Veiled References To Failure Of Defendant To Testify Constitutes Reversible Error, Craig Lambert
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Modern Evidence And The Expert Witness, Faust Rossi
Modern Evidence And The Expert Witness, Faust Rossi
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Wainwright V. Witt: A New Standard For Death-Qualifying A Capital Jury, Phillip M. Stowers
Wainwright V. Witt: A New Standard For Death-Qualifying A Capital Jury, Phillip M. Stowers
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Monitoring Of Beeper Signal Emanating From Private Residence Violates Fourth Amendment Rights Of Those Who Have An Expectation Of Privacy In The Home., Steven J. Berry
Monitoring Of Beeper Signal Emanating From Private Residence Violates Fourth Amendment Rights Of Those Who Have An Expectation Of Privacy In The Home., Steven J. Berry
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Ake V. Oklahoma: The New "Fundamental Error" Exception To Wainwright V, Sykes, Thayne G. Lowe
Ake V. Oklahoma: The New "Fundamental Error" Exception To Wainwright V, Sykes, Thayne G. Lowe
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
I Cannot Tell A Lie: The Standard For New Trial In False Testimony Cases, Daniel Wolf
I Cannot Tell A Lie: The Standard For New Trial In False Testimony Cases, Daniel Wolf
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the question of what standard should be used for granting a new trial when a defendant's conviction is alleged to have been based, at least in part, on false testimony. Part I demonstrates the failure of the existing standards to strike a satisfactory balance between defendants' rights and the efficient administration of the criminal justice system. Part II argues that motions for retrial based upon false testimony should be governed by a standard drawn not only from newly discovered evidence cases generally, but also from cases involving prosecutorial misconduct. Finally, Part III suggests that the proper test …
Criminal Procedure, Ronald J. Bacigal
Criminal Procedure, Ronald J. Bacigal
Law Faculty Publications
This survey addresses only significant Virginia cases and statutes affecting Virginia criminal procedure. For discussion of the impact of federal court decisions, see R. Bacigal, Virginia Criminal Procedure (Supp. 1985).
Remedies To The Dilemma Of Death-Qualified Juries, Robert M. Berry
Remedies To The Dilemma Of Death-Qualified Juries, Robert M. Berry
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure—Exclusionary Rule—No Good Faith Exception To The Arkansas Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Dale Scroggins
Criminal Procedure—Exclusionary Rule—No Good Faith Exception To The Arkansas Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Dale Scroggins
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Johnson
Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Racial prejudice has come under increasingly close scrutiny during the past thirty years, yet its influence on the decisionmaking of criminal juries remains largely hidden from judicial and critical examination. In this Article, Professor Johnson takes a close look at this neglected area. She first sets forth a large body of social science research that reveals a widespread tendency among whites to convict black defendants in instances in which white defendants would be acquitted. Next, she argues that none of the existing techniques for eliminating the influence of racial bias on criminal trials adequately protects minority-race defendants. She contends that …
Dangerous Offenders, Isabel Grant
Dangerous Offenders, Isabel Grant
Dalhousie Law Journal
The specific focus of this paper is on the Dangerous Offender provisions in Part XXI of our Criminal Code.' However, the issues that arise in any form of preventive detention2 go to the heart of our criminal justice system. Hence, these provisions will be used as a vehicle for dealing with the broader issues. Ethical considerations will be discussed as they arise. The paper begins with an analysis of the history of Part XXI, with emphasis on the moral and legal problems that had to be faced as the legislation developed. The legislative history and the case law are important …
Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Michigan Law Review
Fourth amendment critics rank in rows, and it has been repeatedly pointed out that individual cases are inconsistent with each other or that whole chunks of doctrine, such as the automobile exception or the plain view exception, are either misconceived, too broad, or too narrow. But these critics all play the Court on its own field, simply arguing as tenth Justices that the doctrines should be tinkered with in different ways than the Court has done. This Article, in contrast, suggests that current fourth amendment law, complete with the constant tinkering which it necessarily entails, should be abandoned altogether. Instead, …
Florida's New Speedy Trial Rule: The "Window Of Recapture", John F. Yetter
Florida's New Speedy Trial Rule: The "Window Of Recapture", John F. Yetter
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rejoinder: Truth, Justice, And The American Way--Or Professor Haddad's "Hard Choices", John M. Burkoff
Rejoinder: Truth, Justice, And The American Way--Or Professor Haddad's "Hard Choices", John M. Burkoff
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
I frankly think that Professor Haddad's response to my article on pretext searches is first-rate. It is articulate; it is thoughtful and scholarly; it sharpens the issues and the analysis in this area; and, for the most part, I think his criticisms of various portions of my own work present my positions fairly and honestly. On the other hand, I think that Professor Haddad is dead wrong.
Pretextual Fourth Amendment Activity: Another Viewpoint, James B. Haddad
Pretextual Fourth Amendment Activity: Another Viewpoint, James B. Haddad
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Pretextual detentions, arrests, and searches pose knotty fourth amendment problems. With an air of plausibility, defense attorneys often accuse police of pretextual use of arrest warrants, search warrants, and various exceptions to the warrant requirement. Specifically, they contend that officers have utilized a particular fourth amendment doctrine to obtain certain evidence even though courts have not assigned as a reason for approving the doctrine the need to discover such evidence.