Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (41)
- William & Mary Law School (27)
- Selected Works (26)
- Georgetown University Law Center (25)
- BLR (23)
-
- SelectedWorks (19)
- UC Law SF (15)
- UIC School of Law (12)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (12)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- Cornell University Law School (10)
- University of Richmond (10)
- University of Kentucky (9)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- Fordham Law School (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- New York Law School (8)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (8)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- Liberty University (6)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Duke Law (5)
- Florida State University College of Law (5)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (46)
- Constitutional law (35)
- Constitution (26)
- Judicial review (24)
- Federalism (20)
-
- Supreme Court (17)
- First Amendment (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- Terrorism (14)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Legal History (10)
- Marbury v. Madison (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Congress (9)
- Separation of powers (9)
- 9/11 (8)
- Civil rights (8)
- Courts (8)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (8)
- SCOTUS (8)
- Commerce Clause (7)
- Affirmative action (6)
- Canada (6)
- Constitution – Interpretation and construction (6)
- Constitutional history (6)
- Due process (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Government (6)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (6)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (28)
- Faculty Scholarship (25)
- ExpressO (22)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (20)
- Faculty Publications (16)
-
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (15)
- All Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Articles (11)
- UIC Law Review (11)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (9)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (8)
- Journal Articles (7)
- NYLS Law Review (7)
- Charles H. Baron (6)
- Kentucky Law Journal (6)
- Law Faculty Publications (6)
- Publications (6)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (6)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (5)
- American University Law Review (5)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (5)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Articles (5)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- William Mitchell Law Review (5)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 421 - 445 of 445
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Legitimacy, Randy E. Barnett
Constitutional Legitimacy, Randy E. Barnett
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The problem of constitutional legitimacy is to establish why anyone should obey the command of a constitutionally-valid law. A lawmaking system is legitimate if there is a prima facie duty to obey the laws it makes. Neither "consent of the governed" nor "benefits received" justifies obedience. Rather, a prima facie duty of obedience exists either (a) if there is actual unanimous consent to the jurisdiction of the lawmaker or, in the absence of consent, (b) f laws are made by procedures which assure that they are not unjust. In the absence of unanimous consent, a written constitution should be assessed …
Suing The Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, And Judicial Independence, Vicki C. Jackson
Suing The Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, And Judicial Independence, Vicki C. Jackson
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As I suggest below in Part I, federal sovereign immunity was a doctrine of limited effect in the early years of this republic and allowed for a number of remedies for governmental wrongdoing. Moreover, the constitutional provenance of federal "sovereign immunity" is obscure, and was a matter of genuine uncertainty in early years. Over time the doctrine developed, drawing support from some aspects of constitutional architecture as well as from unreasoning and mistaken extensions of other versions of "sovereign immunity." Among the strands of constitutional structure behind federal "sovereign immunity" are Congress' powers over appropriations and the jurisdiction of the …
The National Security Presidency In Constitutional Context: Reflections On Terrorism And The Presidency From The Last Ten Years, James E. Baker
The National Security Presidency In Constitutional Context: Reflections On Terrorism And The Presidency From The Last Ten Years, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In this time of terrorist threat, there is no more important institution to study than the national security presidency. That is because the president is singularly situated to command the instruments to counter terrorism. He is also singularly situated to ensure that such instruments are used effectively, lawfully, and in a manner consistent with constitutional values. I believe I have a duty, based on where I have been, to help others observe and understand the institution of the presidency. I do so because I want the national security presidency to succeed in providing for our physical security and in upholding …
Emotional Harm In Housing Discrimination Cases: A New Look At A Lingering Problem, Victor M. Goode, Conrad Johnson
Emotional Harm In Housing Discrimination Cases: A New Look At A Lingering Problem, Victor M. Goode, Conrad Johnson
Faculty Scholarship
With the United States Supreme Court's condemnation of legal segregation in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, and a vigorous civil rights movement that led to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the nation entered the beginning of a new era in race relations. This, and future civil rights legislation, would be characterized by the development of a national agenda for ending discrimination and promoting equality. One area that was not included in this initial congressional effort, but later found its way into the legislative agenda, was the subject of housing discrimination. Despite the relatively few debates …
What Did They Do And What Does It Mean? The Three-Judge Court's Decision In Mcconnell V. Fec And The Implications For The Supreme Court, Richard Briffault
What Did They Do And What Does It Mean? The Three-Judge Court's Decision In Mcconnell V. Fec And The Implications For The Supreme Court, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
My role at this symposium is to provide a brief overview of the three-judge court's decision in McConnell v. FEC, review the opinions, piece together what the court actually decided, and see how the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA") now stands. I will try to do that briefly, while giving a few general comments about what the court's opinions tell us about the state of campaign finance law today. As a preliminary matter, the three-judge court's opinions provide us with two radically different world views – almost two different intellectual universes – for thinking about campaign finance …
Non-Judicial Review, Mark V. Tushnet
Non-Judicial Review, Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professor Mark Tushnet challenges the view that democratic constitutionalism requires courts to dominate constitutional review. He provides three diverse examples of non-judicial institutions involved in constitutional review and examines the institutional incentives to get the analysis" right." Through these examples, Professor Tushnet argues that non-judicial actors may perform constitutional review that is accurate, effective, and capable of gaining public acceptance. Professor Tushnet recommends that scholars conduct further research into non-judicial review to determine whether ultimately more or less judicial review is necessary in constitutional democracies.
Alternative Forms Of Judicial Review, Mark V. Tushnet
Alternative Forms Of Judicial Review, Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The invention in the late twentieth century of what I call weak-form systems of judicial review provides us with the chance to see in a new light some traditional debates within U.S. constitutional law and theory, which are predicated on the fact that the United States has strong-form judicial review. Strong- and weak-form systems operate on the level of constitutional design, in the sense that their characteristics are specified in constitutional documents or in deep-rooted constitutional traditions. After sketching the differences between strong- and weak-form systems, I turn to design features that operate at the next lower level. Here legislatures …
Factless Jurisprudence, Darren Hutchinson
More Citizen Jurors Or Fewer Citizen Jurors [Japanese Translation By Satoru Shinomiya], Robert Bloom
More Citizen Jurors Or Fewer Citizen Jurors [Japanese Translation By Satoru Shinomiya], Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Normativité Et Biomédecine Aux Etats-Unis, Charles Baron
Normativité Et Biomédecine Aux Etats-Unis, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
No abstract provided.
Searches, Seizures, And Warrants: A Reference Guide To The United States Constitution, Robert Bloom
Searches, Seizures, And Warrants: A Reference Guide To The United States Constitution, Robert Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
The Secession Reference And The Limits Of Law, Richard Kay
The Secession Reference And The Limits Of Law, Richard Kay
Richard Kay
When the Supreme Court of Canada issued its judgment on the legality of "unilateral" Quebec secession in August 1998 many Canadians did not know what to make of it. The Court held that the only lawful way in which Quebec might depart the Canadian federation was through one of the amendment mechanisms provided in the Constitution Act 1982. It thus affirmed that Quebec could not secede without the agreement of at least the Houses of the federal Parliament and some number of provincial legislative assemblies. Prime Minister Chretien declared the next day that the judgement was a "victory for all …
Unexplainable On Grounds Other Than Race: The Inversion Of Privilege And Subordination In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Darren Hutchinson
Unexplainable On Grounds Other Than Race: The Inversion Of Privilege And Subordination In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Darren Hutchinson
Darren L Hutchinson
In this article, Professor Darren Hutchinson contributes to the debate over the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by arguing that the Supreme Court has inverted its purpose and effect. Professor Hutchinson contends that the Court, in its judicial capacity, provides protection and judicial solicitude for privileged and powerful groups in our country, while at the same time requires traditionally subordinated and oppressed groups to utilize the political process to seek redress for acts of oppression. According to Professor Hutchinson, this process allows social structures of oppression and subordination to remain intact.
First, Professor Hutchinson examines the various …
Quale Etica Per I Guidici?, Charles Baron
Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Robe: Judicial Elections, The First Amendment, And Judges As Politicians, Michael R. Dimino
Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Robe: Judicial Elections, The First Amendment, And Judges As Politicians, Michael R. Dimino
Michael R Dimino
The Right To Effective Assistance Of Capital Postconviction Counsel: Constitutional Implications Of Statutory Grants Of Capital Counsel, Celestine Richards Mcconville
The Right To Effective Assistance Of Capital Postconviction Counsel: Constitutional Implications Of Statutory Grants Of Capital Counsel, Celestine Richards Mcconville
Celestine Richards McConville
The problem of incompetent counsel in capital cases is hardly a secret. Much of the attention, however, has focused on incompetent capital trial counsel. This article, by contrast, addresses the problem of incompetent capital counsel at the state and federal postconviction levels. Like the trial and direct review phases, the capital postconviction phase is critical to an accurate and reliable determination of guilt and death-eligibility. Thus, competent counsel is just as necessary during capital postconviction proceedings as it is during capital trial and direct review proceedings.
The Supreme Court, however, has made clear that there is no constitutional right to …
Policing And Equal Protection, Lawrence Rosenthal
Policing And Equal Protection, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
For urban policing, it is the best of times and the worst of times. The innovative and proactive policing techniques that have come into widespread use over the past decade -- sometimes referred to as the "New Policing" -- are credited by many with producing significant reductions in urban crime. The vocal and numerous critics of these tactics, however, claim that the cure has been worse than the disease, by imposing enormous and unwarranted burdens on high crime minority communities where use of these new tactics is concentrated. In this paper, I offer a defense for New Policing as faithful …
Book Review: The Calligraphic State: Conceptualizing The Study Of Society Through Law, Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Book Review: The Calligraphic State: Conceptualizing The Study Of Society Through Law, Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Tabatha Abu El-Haj
No abstract provided.
Legal Research In Mass Communication, Erik Ugland, Everette E. Dennis, Donald M. Gillmor
Legal Research In Mass Communication, Erik Ugland, Everette E. Dennis, Donald M. Gillmor
Erik Ugland
No abstract provided.
Free Association: The United States Experience, Chimene I. Keitner, W. Michael Reisman
Free Association: The United States Experience, Chimene I. Keitner, W. Michael Reisman
Chimene I Keitner
No abstract provided.
The New Federalism: Discerning Truth In American Myths And Legend, Randy Lee
The New Federalism: Discerning Truth In American Myths And Legend, Randy Lee
Randy Lee
No abstract provided.
Confidentiality's Constitutionality: The Incursion On Judicial Powers To Regulate Parties In Court-Connected Mediation, Maureen A. Weston Prof.
Confidentiality's Constitutionality: The Incursion On Judicial Powers To Regulate Parties In Court-Connected Mediation, Maureen A. Weston Prof.
Maureen A Weston
This Article explores the interplay between mediation confidentiality legislation and judicial powers to regulate participant conduct in the pretrial process. Part II describes the role of the court in monitoring parties' conduct in distinct settlement-related processes, such as private settlement negotiations, judicial settlement conferences, court-connected arbitration, and court-connected mediation, as well as the corresponding but varied confidentiality protection accorded these processes. Part III examines judicial decisions analyzing the tension between mediation confidentiality and judicial power to monitor and sanction misconduct in a settlement or court-connected mediation setting, specifically comparing the approach used by the California Supreme Court in Foxgate Homeowners’ …
Neo-Positivismo E Pós-Positivismo Jurídico, Haradja L. Torrens
Neo-Positivismo E Pós-Positivismo Jurídico, Haradja L. Torrens
Haradja L Torrens
No abstract provided.
State Laws And The Independent Judiciary: An Analysis Of The Effects Of The Seventeenth Amendment On The Number Of Supreme Court Cases Holding State Laws Unconstitutional, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
In recent years, the Seventeenth Amendment has been the subject of legal scholarship, congressional hearings and debate, Supreme Court opinions, popular press articles and commentary, state legislative efforts aimed at repeal, and activist repeal movements. To date, the literature on the effects of the Seventeenth Amendment has focused almost exclusively on the effects on the political production of legislation and competition between legislative bodies. Very little attention has been given to the potential adverse effects of the Seventeenth Amendment on the relationship between state legislatures and the federal courts. This Article seeks to fill part of that literature gap, applying …
Are Patriots Bigots? An Inquiry Into The Vices Of In-Group Pride, Zachary Elkins, Rui De Figueiredo
Are Patriots Bigots? An Inquiry Into The Vices Of In-Group Pride, Zachary Elkins, Rui De Figueiredo
Zachary Elkins
No abstract provided.