Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Amendments (2)
- 1933-1939 (1)
- Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 (1)
- Campaign Finance Reform (1)
- Church and State (1)
-
- Constitutional History (1)
- Cutler Lecture (1)
- Federal-State Relations (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Founders (1)
- Freedom of Expression (1)
- Freedom of Religion United States History 1789-1817 (1)
- Legal Assistance to the Poor (1)
- Motions (1)
- New Deal (1)
- New Trials (1)
- Originators (1)
- Political Parties (1)
- Post-Conviction Remedies (1)
- Right to Bear Arms (1)
- Right to Counsel (1)
- State Constitutions (1)
- State Courts (1)
- Third Parties (1)
- United States Constitution 2nd Amendment (1)
- United States Politics (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Voting Research (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Voter Knowledge And Constitutional Change: Assessing The New Deal Experience, Ilya Somin
Voter Knowledge And Constitutional Change: Assessing The New Deal Experience, Ilya Somin
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Critical Stage": Extending The Right To Counsel To The Motion For New Trial Phase, Jonathan G. Neal
"Critical Stage": Extending The Right To Counsel To The Motion For New Trial Phase, Jonathan G. Neal
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Establishment And Disestablishment At The Founding, Part I: Establishment Of Religion, Michael W. Mcconnell
Establishment And Disestablishment At The Founding, Part I: Establishment Of Religion, Michael W. Mcconnell
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating Political Parties Under A "Public Rights" First Amendment, Gregory P. Magarian
Regulating Political Parties Under A "Public Rights" First Amendment, Gregory P. Magarian
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Treating The Pen And The Sword As Constitutional Equals: How And Why The Supreme Court Should Apply Its First Amendment Expertise To The Great Second Amendment Debate, David G. Browne
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Courts As Agents Of Federalism: Power And Interpretation In State Constitutional Law, James A. Gardner
State Courts As Agents Of Federalism: Power And Interpretation In State Constitutional Law, James A. Gardner
William & Mary Law Review
In the American constitutional tradition, federalism is commonly understood as a mechanism designed to institutionalize a kind of permanent struggle between state and national power. The same American constitutional tradition also holds that courts are basically passive institutions whose mission is to apply the law impartially while avoiding inherently political power struggles. These two commonplace understandings conflict on their face. The conflict may be dissolved for federal courts by conceiving their resistance to state authority as the impartial consequence of limitations on state power imposed by the United States Constitution. This reconciliation, however, is unavailable for state courts, which, by …