Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1014)
- Universitas Indonesia (879)
- William & Mary Law School (488)
- Columbia Law School (453)
- Seattle University School of Law (436)
-
- Fordham Law School (367)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (314)
- Georgia State University College of Law (313)
- UC Law SF (271)
- University of Colorado Law School (233)
- UIC School of Law (219)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (212)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (211)
- American University Washington College of Law (208)
- Brooklyn Law School (208)
- University of Georgia School of Law (197)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (189)
- Boston University School of Law (184)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (152)
- University of Kentucky (151)
- University of Miami Law School (151)
- West Virginia University (150)
- University of Richmond (149)
- BLR (148)
- Singapore Management University (135)
- Pepperdine University (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (134)
- Duke Law (131)
- Brigham Young University Law School (127)
- Cornell University Law School (123)
- Keyword
-
- Corporations (1037)
- Corporate governance (648)
- Corporate law (381)
- Shareholders (223)
- SEC (185)
-
- Corporation (184)
- Partnerships (167)
- Securities (152)
- Corporate Law (145)
- Regulation (145)
- Business (144)
- Liability (125)
- Antitrust (123)
- Corporate Governance (122)
- Corporate (120)
- Delaware (120)
- Taxation (118)
- Investment (111)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (110)
- Law (107)
- Economics (105)
- Bankruptcy (104)
- Fiduciary duty (100)
- Fiduciary duties (99)
- Law and Economics (94)
- Disclosure (91)
- Fraud (91)
- Shareholder (91)
- Corporation law (90)
- Corporate social responsibility (87)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1067)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (744)
- Michigan Law Review (596)
- Seattle University Law Review (414)
- Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions (298)
-
- Articles (268)
- UC Law Business Journal (266)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (263)
- William & Mary Annual Tax Conference (234)
- Faculty Publications (214)
- UIC Law Review (211)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (180)
- West Virginia Law Review (147)
- ExpressO (144)
- Scholarly Works (143)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (133)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (130)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (129)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (125)
- Scholarly Articles (120)
- Indiana Law Journal (119)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (116)
- Kentucky Law Journal (115)
- Buffalo Law Review (112)
- Publications (110)
- Cleveland State Law Review (94)
- BYU Law Review (90)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (88)
- Washington Law Review (88)
- University of Richmond Law Review (85)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 9121 - 9150 of 10791
Full-Text Articles in Law
How Should We Talk About Corporations? The Languages Of Economics And Of Citizenship, James Boyd White
How Should We Talk About Corporations? The Languages Of Economics And Of Citizenship, James Boyd White
Articles
My immediate subject in this Comment is section 2.01 of the American Law Institute's proposed Principles of Corporate Governance (Tentative Draft No. 2), which defines in general terms the proper objectives and conduct of a business corporation. My larger subject has to do with the adequacy and inadequacy of various languages in which corporate purposes and limits might be expressed, and especially with the limits of the economic language used in the ALI Draft.
The Appraisal Remedy In Illinois Under The 1983 Business Corporation Act: Some Suggestions For Improvement, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 229 (1985), Michael R. Orlando
The Appraisal Remedy In Illinois Under The 1983 Business Corporation Act: Some Suggestions For Improvement, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 229 (1985), Michael R. Orlando
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disparate Tax Treatment Of Different Types Of Business Organizations: Where Should We Go From Here?, Douglas A. Kahn
Disparate Tax Treatment Of Different Types Of Business Organizations: Where Should We Go From Here?, Douglas A. Kahn
Articles
If several persons wish to join together in a common enterprise in order to pool their capital or labor or some of each, they may choose among a variety of available organizational structures that will serve that purpose. The most common entity forms are partnerships (including joint ventures), corporations, and trusts. While, in its typical structure, each of those entity forms has its own distinct characteristics, the structure of such organizations often is modified by agreement so as to adopt attributes of another type of entity. Because of this, the substantive distinction between entity types is blurred.
The Plight Of Small Issuers (And Others) Under Regulation D: Those Nagging Problems That Need Attention, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
The Plight Of Small Issuers (And Others) Under Regulation D: Those Nagging Problems That Need Attention, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Regulation D traces its roots to section 4(2) and section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. Both of these sections are designed to relieve an issuer from the pains of registration under the 1933 Act in situations where Congress deemed such registration inappropriate. Therefore, under section 4(2), no registration is required for "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering." Section 3(b) is not a self-executing exemption but instead permits the Securities and Exchange Commission to enact rules and regulations exempting issuers from registration requirements "if it finds that ... [registration] is not necessary in the public interest …
Is This The End Of Civil Rico?, Randolph N. Jonakait
Is This The End Of Civil Rico?, Randolph N. Jonakait
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Piercing The Corporate Veil: Do Corporations Provide Limited Personal Liability?, Robert C. Downs
Piercing The Corporate Veil: Do Corporations Provide Limited Personal Liability?, Robert C. Downs
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Golden Parachute Agreements: Reasonable Compensation Or Disguised Bribery, Edwin T. Hood, John J. Benge
Golden Parachute Agreements: Reasonable Compensation Or Disguised Bribery, Edwin T. Hood, John J. Benge
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The New Virginia Stock Corporation Act: A Primer, Daniel T. Murphy
The New Virginia Stock Corporation Act: A Primer, Daniel T. Murphy
University of Richmond Law Review
During its 1985 session, the Virginia General Assembly enacted a new stock corporation statute for Virginia ("Revised Statute"). The new statute became effective January 1, 1986. The Revised Statute represents a complete revision of the Virginia corporation statute and is the result of a thorough review of prior law. This article will discuss some of the significant changes in Virginia corporate law effected by the Revised Statute and will offer some guidelines for the interpretation and application of its provisions.
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.
Tender Offer Litigation And State Law, Mark J. Loewenstein
Tender Offer Litigation And State Law, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
The recent spate of hostile takeover battles has focused attention and criticism on the federal securities laws. Most claims of defeated offerors and disappointed shareholders have been based on sections 14(e) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The United States Supreme Court, however, has limited such federal remedies and suggested that plaintiffs bring state-law actions for interference with a prospective economic advantage. Professor Loewenstein discusses this tort, which has not been used widely in this context, and reviews the tort's traditional elements, its formulation in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, and its recent treatment by state courts. …
The Acquisition Process And The Closely-Held Corporation: Selected Legal Aspects, Joseph J. Norton
The Acquisition Process And The Closely-Held Corporation: Selected Legal Aspects, Joseph J. Norton
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Unfaithful Champion: The Plaintiff As Monitor In Shareholder Litigation, John C. Coffee Jr.
The Unfaithful Champion: The Plaintiff As Monitor In Shareholder Litigation, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
When the legal history of the 1970's is written, it will note a significant shift in the way courts perceived shareholder litigation. Only a generation ago, the Supreme Court described the derivative action as "the chief regulator of corporate management." Even into the 1960's, those issues involving shareholder litigation that percolated up to the Supreme Court were typically resolved so as to extend the availability of a litigation remedy by removing arbitrary or overbroad barriers to the plaintiff.
Tender Offer Defensive Tactics: A Proposal For Reform, Mary Siegel
Tender Offer Defensive Tactics: A Proposal For Reform, Mary Siegel
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Regulation Of Not-For-Profit Corporations In Indiana, John T. Baker
Regulation Of Not-For-Profit Corporations In Indiana, John T. Baker
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Empirical Research And The Shareholder Derivative Suit: Toward A Better-Informed Debate, Bryant G. Garth, Ilene H. Nagel, Sheldon J. Plager
Empirical Research And The Shareholder Derivative Suit: Toward A Better-Informed Debate, Bryant G. Garth, Ilene H. Nagel, Sheldon J. Plager
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Transnational Legal Practice And Professional Ideology, Bryant G. Garth
Transnational Legal Practice And Professional Ideology, Bryant G. Garth
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Copyright Monopoly After Sony Corp. Of America V. Universal City Studios, Inc.
The Copyright Monopoly After Sony Corp. Of America V. Universal City Studios, Inc.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corporate Criminal Liability: A Treatise On The Criminal Liability Of Corporations, Their Officers And Agents By Kathleen F. Brickey, Robert G. Lawson
Corporate Criminal Liability: A Treatise On The Criminal Liability Of Corporations, Their Officers And Agents By Kathleen F. Brickey, Robert G. Lawson
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Kentucky Law Survey: Corporations, Willburt D. Ham
Kentucky Law Survey: Corporations, Willburt D. Ham
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The New Virginia Stock Corporation Act: A Primer, Daniel T. Murphy
The New Virginia Stock Corporation Act: A Primer, Daniel T. Murphy
Law Faculty Publications
During its 1985 session, the Virginia General Assembly enacted a new stock corporation statute for Virginia ("Revised Statute"). The new statute became effective January 1, 1986. The Revised Statute represents a complete revision of the Virginia corporation statute and is the result of a thorough review of prior law. This article will discuss some of the significant changes in Virginia corporate law effected by the Revised Statute and will offer some guidelines for the interpretation and application of its provisions.
Death Or Retirement Of A Partner, Stefan F. Tucker
Death Or Retirement Of A Partner, Stefan F. Tucker
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Selected Current Developments In Subchapter C, Donald V. Moorehead
Selected Current Developments In Subchapter C, Donald V. Moorehead
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Interest Free Loans, Waller H. Horsley
Interest Free Loans, Waller H. Horsley
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Cafeteria Plans In Transition, Leon E. Irish
Cafeteria Plans In Transition, Leon E. Irish
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Second Generation State Takeover Legislation: Maryland Takes A New Tack, Michigan Law Review
Second Generation State Takeover Legislation: Maryland Takes A New Tack, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the approach recently adopted by the Maryland legislature in special session one year after the Supreme Court's decision in MITE. Maryland has departed radically from the regulatory approach of first generation statutes; however, this Note argues that the statute has failed to escape the constitutional infirmities of its predecessors. Part I outlines the various mechanisms that regulate acquisition of corporate control: the federal tender offer regulatory mechanism known as the Williams Act, state takeover legislation such as the Illinois statute invalidated in MITE, and the new Maryland statute. Part II analyzes the debate concerning the …
Schreiber V. Burlington Northern, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Schreiber V. Burlington Northern, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Landreth Timber Co. V. Landreth, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Landreth Timber Co. V. Landreth, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Diversity Jurisdiction And Alien Corporations: The Application Of Section 1332(C), Jim Whitlatch
Diversity Jurisdiction And Alien Corporations: The Application Of Section 1332(C), Jim Whitlatch
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Charting The Future Course For Corporate Management Of Health Risks, Michael S. Baram
Charting The Future Course For Corporate Management Of Health Risks, Michael S. Baram
Faculty Scholarship
Corporations engage in technological activities of benefit to society, but thereby also create new health risks for workers, consumers, and communities. Government regulatory agencies deal with this chronic problem by conducting risk analyses and imposing various duties on private firms. Despite agency efforts and corporate compliance, health risks continue to arise and take their toll. To what extent will private firms voluntarily assume greater responsibility for preventing these health risks? This question is of increasing social importance, because the limitations of regulatory efforts are now obvious, whereas health risks are now being identified at what appears to be an increasing …
Corporate Morality And Management Buyouts
Corporate Morality And Management Buyouts
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.