Technical and Professional Writing Commons^™

Writing And Publishing Scientific Articles: Course Workbook, Editing Services, Research Medical Library (Formerly Scientific Publications)

Writing and Publishing Scientific Articles: Course Workbook

No abstract provided.

A Case Study Using The Transparency Framework And Artificial Intelligence To Promote Effective Writing And Student Success In A Writing-Intensive Course, Elizabeth A. Brown, Maria Kronenburg, Ashlee Steeley, Diana Tagbor

Health Behavior, Policy & Management Faculty Publications

Program evaluation data suggest that undergraduate students struggle with writing in a clear and concise manner and appropriately citing. Faculty implemented the plan-do study-act cycle to pilot the Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) project framework and to explore the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and discuss approaches to using AI, along with the TILT framework, in a writing-intensive course to identify the pros and cons of using ChatGPT in an online classroom. The TILT framework reinforces adult learning by helping students clearly understand the assignment's purpose and establish a clear relationship between assignment and students' professional lives. Faculty encouraged …

Avoiding Common Pitfalls In Medical Writing: An Editor’S Advice, Deanna Erin Conners

Milne Open Textbooks

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Medical Writing is a useful companion text to comprehensive style guides for the biomedical sciences. This book walks authors through best practices for writing scientific papers and grant proposals in a concise and accessible format. Authors and teachers worldwide will benefit from these shared insights of an experienced scientific editor.

Read this book online at: https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/medical-writing/

The Write Stuff - Winter 2023 (Vol. 20, No. 1), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2023

• Protected health information
• Literature reviews: Which type should I write?
• Finding examples of funded NIH applications
• New NIH policy for data management and sharing now in effect
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Person-first language

The Write Stuff - Summer 2022 (Vol. 19, No. 3), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2022

• Next steps after grant rejection
• Resources on new NIH policy for data management and sharing
• What should you include as supplemental material?
• Tips for collaborating with manuscript authors online
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Overlay journal

The Write Stuff - Spring 2022 (Vol. 19, No. 2), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2022

• New PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews
• Top tips for writing article titles
• Key points from NIH seminar: “Including diverse populations in NIH-funded clinical research”
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: NISO

The Write Stuff - Winter 2022 (Vol. 19, No. 1), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2022

• NIH allows flexibility for applicants affected by the COVID-19 pandemic
• Whom to contact for help with your NIH grant applications
• How to write a peer review
• Council of Science Editors launches new podcast
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: QWERTY, AZERTY, and Dvorak

The Write Stuff - Autumn 2022 (Vol. 19, No. 4), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2022

• Updated guidelines on reporting race and ethnicity in the AMA Manual of Style
• ARRIVE 2.0 and MDAR Framework guide methods reporting for animal research and other life sciences research
• SciScore: A tool to measure reproducibility
• Tips for using figures effectively in grant proposals
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Format-free submission

Plagiarism In Non-Anglophone Countries: A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Researchers And Journal Editors, Latika Gupta, Javeria Tariq, Marlen Yessirkepov, Olena Zimba, Durga Prasanna Misra, Vikas Agarwal, Armen Yuri Gasparyan

Medical College Documents

Background: Plagiarism is one of the most common violation of publication ethics, and it still remains an area with several misconceptions and uncertainties.
Methods: This online cross-sectional survey was conducted to analyze plagiarism perceptions among researchers and journal editors, particularly from non-Anglophone countries.
Results: Among 211 respondents (mean age 40 years; M:F, 0.85:1), 26 were scholarly journal editors and 70 were reviewers with a large representation from India (50, 24%), Turkey (28, 13%), Kazakhstan (25, 12%) and Ukraine (24, 11%). Rigid and outdated pre- and post-graduate education was considered as the origin of plagiarism by 63% of respondents. Paraphragiarism was …

The Write Stuff - Autumn 2021 (Vol. 18, No. 4), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2021

• The growing acceptance of preprints in biomedical publishing
• NIH biosketch changes
• Opening up the functionality of Microsoft Word with the Read Aloud tool
• NCI’s Author Arranger tool for manuscript title pages
• NIH tips for writing a research plan
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Creative Commons

The Write Stuff - Summer 2021 (Vol. 18, No. 3), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2021

• A friendly reminder about Core Grant citations
• Using BioRender to create scientific figures
• Reminder to grant authors: Check for grant requirements to publish in open access journals
• Promoting research articles

The Write Stuff - Spring 2021 (Vol. 18, No. 2), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2021

• A change to the calculation of Journal Impact Factors
• NIH podcast discusses alternatives to animals in biomedical research
• Two online grammar resources to bookmark
• What is a graphical abstract?
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: FAIR Principles

The Write Stuff - Winter 2021 (Vol. 18, No. 1), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2021

• Resources for making your research more rigorous
• Best practices for presenting with Zoom
• Research articles: Establishing authorship and author order
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Megajournal

The Write Stuff - Autumn 2020 (Vol. 17, No. 4), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2020

• New NIH training module: Vertebrate Animals Section
• When a journal requests English-language editing
• CRediT aims to clarify contributions to scientific publications
• The Assisted Referral Tool (ART): A resource for selecting the best NIH study sections for your grant proposal
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Cascading peer review

The Write Stuff - Summer 2020 (Vol. 17, No. 3), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2020

• Boost your chances of publication by following journals’ instructions to authors
• EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero: which citation management software is best?
• Building your data management plan
• Search for funding opportunities with Pivot
• Expanding use of digital object identifiers in scientific publishing

Manuscript Writing And Publication Workshop: An Invoking Pilot Study On Enhancing Cognitive Research Capabilities In Health Sciences Institutes Of Pakistan, Mehwish Hussain, Rehana Rehman, Mukhtiar Baig

Department of Biological & Biomedical Sciences

Background: With an upsurge in research in developing countries, researchers from allied sciences need to augment their skills for disseminating research work worldwide. Training workshop is one of the quick interventions which can enhance writing skills and ease research publication.
Objective: We designed this research to explore the perception of the faculty of different higher education institutes (HEIs) regarding manuscript writing and to assess the impact of these workshops in the improvement of cognitive capabilities of preliminary researchers in Pakistan.
Methodology: We conducted workshops in HEIs of Sindh, Pakistan. Contents of the workshop covered algorithm of writing manuscript and related …

Annual Evaluation Of The Student's Perception Of The Value Of Writing Goals, Renee Kuess

ONU Student Research Colloquium

Focus: This study focused on pharmacy students’ perception of the value of writing goals and how this perception changes as students progress in the program.

Methods: Annually, all students in the pharmacy program are required to reflect on the previous year’s goals and develop new goals. Following this assignment, a survey was sent out to a random sample (n=162) of students. Based on the feedback, the response was classified as indicating “value” or “no value”.

Results: Of the 162 surveys sent out, there were 78 completed responses. 56.25% of responses indicated the student found “value” in the assignment. The data …

The Write Stuff - Spring 2020 (Vol. 17, No. 2), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2020

• How to discuss your study's limitations effectively
• Reference letters vs. letters of support for NIH grant applications: What's the difference?
• NCI Bottom Line blog offers insight into grant funding and budgets
• Dissertations, Text Recycling, and Self-Plagiarism
• NIH Increases the use of Notices of Special Interest
• Tips for using Track Changes in Microsoft Word

The Write Stuff - Winter 2020 (Vol. 17, No. 1), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2020

• Best practices for sharing confidential materials outside MD Anderson
• 11th edition of the AMA Manual of Style to be published this month
• MD Anderson’s policies on disclosure of foreign relationships
• New NIH grant application instructions and forms coming in spring 2020
• Cabell’s Blacklist
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Hybrid journal and mirror journal

The Write Stuff - Autumn 2019 (Vol.16, No.4), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2019

• Scientific Publications and the Research Medical Library join forces, expand services
• Incorporating sex as a biological variable in NIH grant applications
• Hyperlinks in NIH grant applications
• Altmetrics: Looking beyond citation analysis to measure impact
• Guidelines for reporting your research methods to improve reproducibility and rigor
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Core Grant

The Write Stuff - Summer 2019 (Vol. 16, No. 3), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2019

• Using Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) to enhance rigor and reproducibility
• Court ruling sheds light on publishing giant OMICS International
• Manuscript presentation tips to improve the peer review process
• How to insert Greek letters, symbols, and other special characters in Word documents
• Changes to Plan S give researchers and publishers time to adapt
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Hanging indent

The Write Stuff - Spring 2019 (Vol.16, No.2), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2019

• Setting up a writing critique group
• NIH clarifies terminology regarding rigor of the prior research
• Scientific Publications’ grant proposal editing service
• European Plan S aims to mandate open access by 2020
• NIH tip: Check your funding opportunity announcement 30 days before submitting your grant application
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: “Blinded” peer review and clinical trials

A Case Report Of Case Report Pursuit By Medical Student, Jonathan Li, Jennifer Wilson, Wayne Bond Lau

Student Papers, Posters & Projects

Medical students often seek case reports as vehicles for academic writing opportunities, conference presentation avenues, and residency/fellowship application highlights. Here we review a case where, due to unfortunate circumstances, a student made a unique diagnosis central to proper patient clinical care, wished to write up the case subsequently, but was ultimately excluded from the final work stemming from the patient case. We review the pitfalls that occurred in the process of pursuing publication of an interesting case, the educational value of pursuing case reports for students, the necessity for strong mentorship in this process, and general principles that medical students …

The Write Stuff - Winter 2019 (Vol.16, No.1), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2019

• Grant Writers' seminars return in March
• How to disagree with an NIH research grant proposal review
• Using Publons to track and show peer reviews
• Journal initiatives aim to improve transparency and reproducibility
• New NIH videos demystify the grant review process
• NIH launches new version of NIH Data Book including 2018 funding statistics
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Sentence case and title case

The Write Stuff - Autumn 2018 (Vol.15, No.4), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2018

No abstract provided.

The Write Stuff - Summer 2018 (Vol. 15, No. 3), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2018

• Celebrating 70 years of serving MD Anderson
• Do grant reviewers read reference lists?
• NIH encourages authors to publish NIH-funded research only in reputable journals
• Preliminary data and R01 grants
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: First person

The Write Stuff - Spring 2018 (Vol. 15, No. 2), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2018

• What is a PMCID and how do I get one?
• Updates to ClinicalTrials.gov
• EndNote Manuscript Matcher helps authors identify journals
• NIH grant applications: Where should the preliminary data go?
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: h-index

Approach To Developing Basic And Scientific Writing Competency In Dnp Students At Samuel Merritt University, Michelle Hampton

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Cognitive Load Theory: Applications In Medical Education, Adam W. Wissman

Technical Communication Capstone Course

This article examines how cognitive load theory can help instructional designers in medical education design material and content to best suit their audience. Through the examination of schema construction, working and long-term memory, biologically primary/secondary knowledge, and novice and experienced learners, this article proposes instructional design best practices. This article separates these best practices into three categories: activities, pre-lecture resources, and teaching strategies, which can be applied to either novice learners or experienced learners.

The Write Stuff - Winter 2018 (Vol. 15, No. 1), Research Medical Library

Write Stuff 2018

• Information Security’s “questionable journal” initiative flags potentially predatory publishers and sponsors
• Communicating with your editor to make the most of the help you receive
• NIH’s Next Generation Researchers Initiative
• Scientific Publications offers writing consultation services
• Getting to know the NIH grant programs
• Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Gold, platinum, and green open access