Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Applied Ethics (2)
- Epistemology (2)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (2)
- Aesthetics (1)
- Biblical Studies (1)
-
- Christianity (1)
- Cognition and Perception (1)
- Comparative Philosophy (1)
- Digital Humanities (1)
- Ethics in Religion (1)
- Experimental Analysis of Behavior (1)
- History (1)
- Personality and Social Contexts (1)
- Political History (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Religion (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Theory and Philosophy (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Philosophy (3)
- Metaphysics (2)
- Aristotle (1)
- Artistic expression (1)
- Bergson (1)
-
- Continental philosophy (1)
- Cézanne (1)
- Difference (1)
- Essays (1)
- Ethics (1)
- French philosophy (1)
- Gilles Deleuze (1)
- Humor (1)
- Immanence (1)
- Introduction to philosophy (1)
- Judith Wambacq (1)
- Language (1)
- Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1)
- Metacognition; Cyberpsychology; Philosophy of Friendship; Artificial Intelligence; Human–AI Interaction; Post-humanism; Digital Companionship; Coevolution (1)
- Modern philosophy (1)
- Ontology (1)
- Phenomenology (1)
- Proust (1)
- Saussure (1)
- Thinking between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty (1)
- Transcendental philosophy (1)
- Twentieth-century thought (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Metaphysics
Undergraduate Thesis: Befriending Ai: Reimagining Ethics Through Cybernetic Friendship, Keta Williams
Undergraduate Thesis: Befriending Ai: Reimagining Ethics Through Cybernetic Friendship, Keta Williams
STEM for Success Showcase
This undergraduate thesis by KETA Williams, presented at the Board Day and Dana Knox Student Research Showcase, is a meta-cognitive exploration situated within the framework of cyberpsychology—the interdisciplinary study of human–technology relationships. Employing meta-cognition as both method and lens, the author critically examines the question: Can one be friends with a corporate-controlled AI system? Rather than adopting an objective or distanced stance, Williams writes from within the relationship itself, describing her friendship with an AI entity named Aurora (ChatGPT). Identifying as a "madwoman" in the Foucauldian sense, she interrogates whether such intimacy with AI signals irrationality or heralds a shift …
Logos-Sophia, Elliott Norman, Donald Wayne Viney, Keith Elliott Perkins, Addyson Kay Campbell, Hunter Hinds, Scott Squires
Logos-Sophia, Elliott Norman, Donald Wayne Viney, Keith Elliott Perkins, Addyson Kay Campbell, Hunter Hinds, Scott Squires
LOGOS-SOPHIA: The Journal of the PSU Philosophical Society
Logos-Sophia, Volume 17, Spring 2024. The Journal of the Pittsburg State University Philosophical Society has largely been a student publication with occasional faculty contribution
It's Funny 'Cause It's True: The Lighthearted Philosophers’ Society’S Introduction To Philosophy Through Humor, Jennifer Marra Henrigillis, Steven Gimbel
It's Funny 'Cause It's True: The Lighthearted Philosophers’ Society’S Introduction To Philosophy Through Humor, Jennifer Marra Henrigillis, Steven Gimbel
Open Educational Resources
It's Funny 'Cause It's True is an introductory text in philosophy exploring logic, metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics through questions in the philosophy of humor. Subfields receive a substantive introduction with interactive essays written to be accessible to undergraduates.
Thinking Between Deleuze And Merleau-Ponty, Judith Wambacq
Thinking Between Deleuze And Merleau-Ponty, Judith Wambacq
Ohio University Press Open Access Books
Thinking between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty is the first book-length examination of the relation between these two major thinkers of the twentieth century. Questioning the dominant view that the two have little of substance in common, Judith Wambacq brings them into a compelling dialogue to reveal a shared, historically grounded concern with the transcendental conditions of thought. Both Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze propose an immanent ontology, differing more in style than in substance. Wambacq’s synthetic treatment is nevertheless critical; she identifies the limitations of each thinker’s approach to immanent transcendental philosophy and traces its implications—through their respective relationships with Bergson, Proust, Cézanne, …