Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Metaphysics (2)
- Wittgenstein (2)
- <p>Emerson, Ralph Waldo, 1803-1882 - Criticism and interpretation.</p> <p>Melville, Herman, 1819-1891 - Criticism and interpretation.</p> <p>Jeffers, Robinson, 1887-1962 - Criticism and interpretation.</p> <p>Metaphysics in literature.</p> (1)
- Argumentation (1)
- Context (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Metaphysics
Later Wittgenstein’S Metaphysics, Jeremy Barris
Later Wittgenstein’S Metaphysics, Jeremy Barris
Humanities Faculty Research
Introduction
Ludwig Wittgenstein, in different ways in his earlier and later work, famously denies the general meaningfulness and consequently the legitimacy of traditional philosophical questions. Accordingly, he also denies the meaningfulness and legitimacy of any metaphysics. I focus here on Wittgenstein’s later view. In that view, words and statements are given their meanings by their uses in specific contexts of everyday life. As a result, any attempt to use words to talk or think about anything outside of those contexts literally deprives those words of their meaning. But traditional philosophical questions, and metaphysical questions and statements in particular, are characterized …
Davidson And A Twist Of Wittgenstein: Metaontology, Self-Canceling Paradox, And Settled Insight, Jeremy Barris
Davidson And A Twist Of Wittgenstein: Metaontology, Self-Canceling Paradox, And Settled Insight, Jeremy Barris
Humanities Faculty Research
The paper proposes with Davidson that the talk of metaontology is literally meaningless, but with Wittgenstein that it is so in a way that grants a unique type of insight. More specifically, it argues both that Davidson’s arguments have a cogency that is hard to dismiss, and also that, since his own arguments are metaontological, they are self-referential, and consequently in turn undermine their own meaning as well. The paper argues further that metaontological statements cannot be avoided. Consequently, this kind of statement constitutes an unavoidable self-referential paradox that means what it also excludes as capable of meaning. The result …
Metaphysics, Deep Pluralism, And Paradoxes Of Informal Logic, Jeremy Barris
Metaphysics, Deep Pluralism, And Paradoxes Of Informal Logic, Jeremy Barris
Humanities Faculty Research
The paper argues that metaphysical thought, or thought in whose context our general framework of sense is under scrutiny, involves, legitimates, and requires a variety of informal analogues of the ‘true contradictions’ supported in some paraconsistent formal logics. These are what we can call informal ‘legitimate logical inadequacies’. These paradoxical logical structures also occur in deeply pluralist contexts, where more than one, conflicting general framework for sense is relevant. The paper argues further that these legitimate logical inadequacies are real or inherent in sense itself rather than conventional, shows how they can feature in argumentative practice in these metaphysical and …
Metaphysics And The Charge Of Misanthropy : Ralph Waldo Emerson’S “Circles” As A Cipher For Understanding The Connection Between Robinson Jeffers And Herman Melville, Hunter Stark
Theses, Dissertations and Capstones
Herman Melville’s and Robinson Jeffers’s metaphysical thoughts reflect Ralph Waldo Emerson’s notion of looking towards Nature for discovery; all three writers’ observations of Nature influence how they see humanity’s place in existence. Both Melville and Jeffers observe Nature decentralizing humanity, which distinguishes their views from Emerson’s. Where Jeffers’s verse sternly voices this message, openly criticizing the anthropocentric viewpoint, Melville utilizes humor, subtly confronting the anthropocentric proponent and downplaying humanity’s power. Jeffers garners the label of misanthrope, whereas Melville’s metaphysical realm in Moby-Dick largely escapes this charge with the masking quality of his humor. Comparing both writers’ texts to an Emersonian …
A Survey On Ontology Mapping, Namyoun Choi, Il-Yeol Song, Hyoil Han
A Survey On Ontology Mapping, Namyoun Choi, Il-Yeol Song, Hyoil Han
Computer Sciences and Electrical Engineering Faculty Research
Ontology is increasingly seen as a key factor for enabling interoperability across heterogeneous systems and semantic web applications. Ontology mapping is required for combining distributed and heterogeneous ontologies. Developing such ontology mapping has been a core issue of recent ontology research. This paper presents ontology mapping categories, describes the characteristics of each category, compares these characteristics, and surveys tools, systems, and related work based on each category of ontology mapping. We believe this paper provides readers with a comprehensive understanding of ontology mapping and points to various research topics about the specific roles of ontology mapping.