Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Artistic expression (1)
- Bergson (1)
- Continental philosophy (1)
- Cézanne (1)
- Difference (1)
-
- Edmund Husserl (1)
- French philosophy (1)
- Gilles Deleuze (1)
- Imagination (1)
- Immanence (1)
- Judith Wambacq (1)
- Language (1)
- Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1)
- Metaphysics (1)
- Modern philosophy (1)
- Ontology (1)
- Perception (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Pittsburgh School (1)
- Proust (1)
- Saussure (1)
- Thinking between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty (1)
- Transcendental philosophy (1)
- Twentieth-century thought (1)
- Wilfrid Sellars (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Comparative Philosophy
Wilfrid Sellars And Phenomenology : Intersections, Encounters, Oppositions, Daniele De Santis, Danilo Manca
Wilfrid Sellars And Phenomenology : Intersections, Encounters, Oppositions, Daniele De Santis, Danilo Manca
Ohio University Press Open Access Books
Wilfrid Sellars tackled the difficult problems of reconciling Pittsburgh school–style analytic thought, Husserlian phenomenology, and the Myth of the Given.
This collection of essays brings into dialogue the analytic philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars—founder of the Pittsburgh school of thought—and phenomenology, with a special focus on the work of Edmund Husserl. The book’s wide-ranging discussions include the famous Myth of the Given but also more traditional problems in the philosophy of mind and phenomenology such as the
status of perception and imagination
nature of intentionality
concept of motivation
relationship between linguistic and nonlinguistic experiences
relationship between conceptual and preconceptual experiences
Moreover, …
Thinking Between Deleuze And Merleau-Ponty, Judith Wambacq
Thinking Between Deleuze And Merleau-Ponty, Judith Wambacq
Ohio University Press Open Access Books
Thinking between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty is the first book-length examination of the relation between these two major thinkers of the twentieth century. Questioning the dominant view that the two have little of substance in common, Judith Wambacq brings them into a compelling dialogue to reveal a shared, historically grounded concern with the transcendental conditions of thought. Both Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze propose an immanent ontology, differing more in style than in substance. Wambacq’s synthetic treatment is nevertheless critical; she identifies the limitations of each thinker’s approach to immanent transcendental philosophy and traces its implications—through their respective relationships with Bergson, Proust, Cézanne, …