Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (11191)
- Constitutional Law (1622)
- State and Local Government Law (947)
- Torts (910)
- Courts (879)
-
- Contracts (846)
- Estates and Trusts (841)
- Supreme Court of the United States (837)
- Legislation (770)
- Property Law and Real Estate (747)
- Legal History (684)
- Legal Writing and Research (674)
- Criminal Law (636)
- Labor and Employment Law (625)
- Business Organizations Law (596)
- Evidence (542)
- Jurisdiction (541)
- Tax Law (500)
- Banking and Finance Law (475)
- Criminal Procedure (462)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (461)
- Securities Law (456)
- Litigation (446)
- Law and Society (423)
- Commercial Law (421)
- Civil Procedure (418)
- Administrative Law (404)
- Fourteenth Amendment (361)
- Common Law (358)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (353)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (404)
- Book reviews (279)
- Liability (266)
- Negligence (249)
- Michigan (245)
-
- History (241)
- Fraud (223)
- New York (205)
- Treatises (193)
- Due process (192)
- Publications (181)
- Constitution (166)
- Judicial review (157)
- Intent (149)
- Law reform (149)
- Regulation (143)
- Race and law (135)
- Fifth Amendment (133)
- Corporations (126)
- Lawyers (122)
- Law professors (120)
- State courts (120)
- Federal courts (112)
- England (109)
- Interstate commerce (108)
- University of Michigan Law School (107)
- California (96)
- Competition (96)
- Racism (96)
- Clayton Act (95)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 11221 - 11250 of 12806
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Cases On International Law, Hector G. Spaulding
Cases On International Law, Hector G. Spaulding
Michigan Law Review
A Review of CASES ON INTERNATIONAL LAW By Manley O. Hudson.
Divorce - Recrimination As A Defense
Divorce - Recrimination As A Defense
Michigan Law Review
If both parties have a right to divorce, neither party has. This judicial pronouncement, paradoxical and puzzling as it must seem, at least to the lay mind, nevertheless embodies the kernel of the doctrine of recrimination as it is applied in divorce cases by modem courts. One party seeks divorce and proves beyond doubt that he or she is entitled to relief. But, if it is found that the complaining party too, is guilty of conduct for which a divorce may be granted, the court turns a deaf ear to both. For, in the oft quoted words of Chancellor Wallworth, …
Receivers-Penalties On Taxes
Michigan Law Review
The recent case of McCormick v. Puritan Coal Mining Co. presents the question whether penalties and interest continue to accrue on delinquent taxes after the date of the appointment of a receiver. The court determined the question in the negative, supporting its decision by authorities which hold that interest does not ordinarily accrue on the debts of an insolvent after the date of the appointment of a receiver. The decision is directly contrary to the established rule that tax penalties and interest continue to accrue, notwithstanding the property has passed into the hands of a receiver.
Corporations-Book Value
Michigan Law Review
A owned 500 shares of preferred stock which was subject to redemption, by the terms of the certificate of incorporation, at, the "book value of the stock as shown by the last annual statement of assets and liabilities of the company submitted to and approved by the board of directors." The board voted to redeem at a price which by reference to the statement was fixed at $323.21 per share. A's bill alleged among other things that this was an artificial and undervalued estimate; that the directors had fraudulently approved the statement for their benefit as common stockholders; that the …
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Front Matter for Volume 29, Issue 2 of Michigan Law Review
Claims Against The Creditor As Defenses To The Surety, H. W. Arant
Claims Against The Creditor As Defenses To The Surety, H. W. Arant
Michigan Law Review
In the absence of statutory provision, where the surety is sued alone, the generally accepted view is that he can not show the existence of a claim in favor of his principal against the creditor for the purpose of preventing or decreasing the creditor's recovery against him. The view has frequently been applied where the surety, sued alone, sought to set up the creditor's breach of warranty as a defense. It recognizes that such a breach of warranty gives rise to a cause of action against the creditor that belongs solely to the principal debtor. It also recognizes the possibility …
The Supreme Court's Construction Of The Self-Incrimination Clause, Edward S. Corwin
The Supreme Court's Construction Of The Self-Incrimination Clause, Edward S. Corwin
Michigan Law Review
The second pivotal decision of the court in construction of the self-incrimination clause is that in Counselman v. Hitchcock, decided in 1892. An advantageous approach to it is furnished by certain earlier state and federal court decisions applying the common law regarding the privilege of witnesses.
Banks And Banking--Damages--Liability Of Bank To Depositor For Wrongful Dishonor Of Check
Banks And Banking--Damages--Liability Of Bank To Depositor For Wrongful Dishonor Of Check
Michigan Law Review
In an action by a creditor against his debtor for the non-payment of the debt, the ordinary measure of damages for non-performance of the contract is the sum of money itself with interest at the legal rate from the time it was due. Tradition has it that the relation between bank and depositor is that of debtor and creditor. Clearly, it is a contractual relationship. The contract, however, is not merely to pay the creditor but also to pay, on his behalf, such third persons as he may designate. It is not an adequate description to say, merely, that the …
Constitutional Law -Elections - Constitutionality Of The Corrupt Practices Act-The Kohler Case
Constitutional Law -Elections - Constitutionality Of The Corrupt Practices Act-The Kohler Case
Michigan Law Review
The relator brought an action to test the right of the defendant Kohler to the office of governor of the state of Wisconsin, asserting that his election was invalid for violation of the Corrupt Practices Act, particularly in that he had expended more than $100,000 for political purposes in violation of the provision of the act limiting such expenditures for candidates for governor to $4,000. The defendant demurred to the petition, asserting that the Corrupt Practices Act is void and unconstitutional as applied to the governor because (1) the statute seeks to prescribe either qualifications for the office of governor …
Aviation-Trespass-Nuisance
Michigan Law Review
Land-owners sought to enjoin flight over their property as a trespass and nuisance; and to enjoin as a nuisance the use of the adjoining field as a base from which to make such flights. Held, injunction denied because of insufficient evidence of injury. Flight at 500 feet or more was impliedly authorized by the statute forbidding flight lit less than that attitude over buildings or persons. Mass. Acts, 1922, ch. 534, sec. 1 sub-sec. 55. As to occasional flights over unoccupied brush land at a height of about 100 feet in landing or taking off, injunctive relief was denied …
Bankruptcy-Voluntary Petition By Incompetent On Court Order
Bankruptcy-Voluntary Petition By Incompetent On Court Order
Michigan Law Review
A state court adjudged B to be insane, committed him to an asylum, appointed G as guardian of his estate, and later authorized G to file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy on behalf of B. Such a petition was filed by G, the schedule of liabilities showing debts contracted before B was adjudicated insane. The federal district court adjudicated B a bankrupt and appointed a trustee in bankruptcy, who sued C to recover an alleged preference paid to C by B. C then sought to set aside the adjudication of bankruptcy on the ground that an insane person could not …
Constitutional Law-Crimes-Waiver Of Jury
Constitutional Law-Crimes-Waiver Of Jury
Michigan Law Review
The accused, on trial for a felony, was permitted by the trial judge to waive a jury. The trial before the judge alone resulted in an acquittal. The state's attorney petitioned for a writ of mandamus to expunge from the record the orders to dispose of the cause without a jury and for discharge of the accused, on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause. Held, writ of mandamus denied. People ex rel. Swanson v. Fisher (Ill., 1930) 172 N.E. 722.
Corporations-Dissolution-Distribution Of Assets Between Preferred And Common Stockholders
Corporations-Dissolution-Distribution Of Assets Between Preferred And Common Stockholders
Michigan Law Review
The Commonwealth Hotel Construction Co. became insolvent, and, after the creditors had been paid in full, the preferred and common stockholders disagreed to the distribution of the remaining assets. The articles of incorporation provided that the holders of preferred stock should be entitled to dividends at the rate of seven per centum per annum which should be cumulative "so that, if dividends for any past dividend period at the rate of seven per centum per annum shall not have been paid thereon or set apart therefor, the deficiency shall be fully paid or set apart, but without interest, before any …
Election Of Remedies-Pursuit Of Supposed Remedy As Bar To Suit On Existing Remedy
Election Of Remedies-Pursuit Of Supposed Remedy As Bar To Suit On Existing Remedy
Michigan Law Review
A contracted with B to devise certain lands to B. A conveyed the land to another before his death. B sued C, as executor of the will of A, for damages for A's breach of contract. B's action failed by reason of a plea of the statute of frauds. B then sued C for money expended by him, property delivered, and services rendered in reliance on the alleged contract. Held, B could recover, for the doctrine of election of remedies is no bar unless there are distinct remedies in existence when the action was begun. White v. McKnight (S. …
Evidence--Physician-Patient Privilege--Express And Implied Waiver
Evidence--Physician-Patient Privilege--Express And Implied Waiver
Michigan Law Review
Defendant's intestate applied for insurance with "plaintiff, expressly waiving, for himself and beneficiaries, the privilege of excluding testimony of physicians who had then attended him or might do so later. The policy lapsed, but the insured, falsely representing that he was in good health and had consulted no doctor for any cause, secured a reinstatement. He died six months later. Plaintiff sued for cancellation, and defendant objected to the testimony of physicians who had been consulted before and after the reinstatement. Held, the testimony was admissible, since the privilege was waived; also the mere fact that there were consultations …
Marriage-Validity Of Marriage Terminable At Will Of The Parties Under Soviet Law
Marriage-Validity Of Marriage Terminable At Will Of The Parties Under Soviet Law
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner married the respondent in Moscow, in 1924, the parties being the domiciled in the Soviet Union. By Soviet law a divorce could be secured upon the registration of both parties of their desire to terminate the marriage, or upon the application of one of them to a court which had no discretion but to dissolve the union. The petitioner filed a bill for separation in England, and an issue was directed in the lower court to determine whether the parties had ever been husband and wife. The court held the marriage invalid, but on appeal it was held the …
Master And Servant-Parent And Child-Liability Of Master When Servant Negligently Injures His Own Son
Master And Servant-Parent And Child-Liability Of Master When Servant Negligently Injures His Own Son
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was injured through the negligence of his father who was employed by the defendant. The parent was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the injury. Held, plaintiff could recover from his father's employer, even though the child could not have sued his father. Chase v. New Haven Waste Material Corporation (Conn. 1930) 150 Atl. 107.
Negligence-Res Ipsa Loquitur-Presumption Of Management From Ownership-Unattended Automobile
Negligence-Res Ipsa Loquitur-Presumption Of Management From Ownership-Unattended Automobile
Michigan Law Review
After the sound of a crash, the defendant's motortruck was found on the plaintiff's porch. Held, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was applicable.
Quasi-Contracts--Duress--Economic Pressure-Adequacy Of Legal Remedies
Quasi-Contracts--Duress--Economic Pressure-Adequacy Of Legal Remedies
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff deposited funds with the defendant, a stock-broker, as security for his margin account. The defendant without authority sold short on the plaintiff's account a large number of shares of stock and threatened to use the plaintiff's deposits to cover the sale unless the plaintiff would authorize a purchase for that purpose. The plaintiff under protest authorized the defendant to purchase the stock, which in the meanwhile had increased in value. The plaintiff then brought suit to recover the difference between the sale and the re-purchase prices plus the defendant's commissions and transfer taxes. Held, on demurrer that …
Torts-Inducing Breach Of Contract
Torts-Inducing Breach Of Contract
Michigan Law Review
A contracted to build a dwelling for B, a negro. C, learning that A was building the structure for B, called on B and gave B to understand that the neighborhood would not permit B to use the building after completion. There were no direct threats, nor was there any violence, nor was B requested to cancel the contract. A sues C for inducing the breach which follows C's conversation with B. Held, A was entitled to damages even though C bore no malice toward A and did not intend to cause damage to A. Carson v. Stephens (La. …
Witnesses-Refreshing Memory-Past Recollection
Witnesses-Refreshing Memory-Past Recollection
Michigan Law Review
Action on a claimed oral renewal of a burglary insurance policy. Nearly six months after the alleged renewal W made an affidavit stating that she heard defendant's agent tell plaintiff that plaintiff's policy had been renewed. This affidavit was drawn up by plaintiff's attorney. On the trial eight years later W was unable to recall any such conversation and the affidavit did not refresh her memory. The court over objection admitted the affidavit itself in evidence. Held, since the affidavit was not made at or near the time of the event recorded, and was drawn up by one of …
The Laws And Liberties Of Massachusetts, Randolph G. Adams
The Laws And Liberties Of Massachusetts, Randolph G. Adams
Michigan Law Review
A Review of THE LAWS AND LIBERTIES OF MASSACHUSETTS reprinted from the copy of the 1648 edition in the Henry E. Huntington Library, with an Introduction by Max Farrand.
Probate Law Directory
Michigan Law Review
A Review of PROBATE LAW DIRECTORY By J. C. Fisher.
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Front Matter for Volume 29, Issue 1 of Michigan Law Review
Effect Of Tax Exemption And Tax Refunding Provisions On The Negotiability Of Corporate Bonds
Effect Of Tax Exemption And Tax Refunding Provisions On The Negotiability Of Corporate Bonds
Michigan Law Review
The Connecticut court in a series of recent cases has cast considerable doubt on the negotiability of bonds containing provisions for payment without deduction for taxes and for refunding of personal property taxes paid by the holder on account of the instrument. In Mechanic's Bank v. Johnson it held a promissory note containing a promise to pay taxes assessed against the instrument non-negotiable on the ground that the amount was uncertain. In Mazurkiewicz v. Dowholonek it held unconstitutional an act, passed after the earlier decision, establishing the negotiability of such instruments already in circulation, on the ground that it impaired …
Taxation-Jurisdiction To Tax Intangibles
Taxation-Jurisdiction To Tax Intangibles
Michigan Law Review
Until recently the fact that one state had jurisdiction to tax intangibles was no basis for asserting that another state did not, there being apparently no constitutional impediment to double taxation. Nor did the fact that a state lacked jurisdiction to tax property in intangibles necessarily imply an absence of power to tax succession to that property. Both doctrines have been repudiated by the United States Supreme Court in Farmer's Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota and Baldwin v. Missouri, decided during the last term.
Aliens-Right To Hold Propsrty-Effect Of Statutes
Aliens-Right To Hold Propsrty-Effect Of Statutes
Michigan Law Review
An alien testator devised land to her son, which property was seized during the World War by the defendant Alien Property Custodian as belonging to an alien enemy. Von Zedtwitz v. Sutherland, 58 App. D. C. 153, 26 F.(2d) 525. The plaintiffs sued the son in Kentucky, where part of the land was located, and the Alien Property Custodian in this suit to recover the property on the theory that after the eight-year period which the laws of Kentucky allowed the alien heir in which to dispose of the realty, the title vested in them as next of kin …
Conflict Of Laws-Which Law Governs The Essential Validity Of A Warrant Of Attorney To Confess Judgment Contained In Another Instrument
Michigan Law Review
Defendant executed a promissory note in Michigan which contained a warrant of attorney authorizing the confessing of judgment by an attorney of any court of record. By statute in Michigan, such a power must be in a separate instrument before a pro confesso judgment can be entered. Plaintiff, an indorsee of the note, got a judgment rendered on the note in Illinois by virtue of such authorization. He then brought suit in Michigan upon this Illinois judgment. Held, the validity of the power is governed by the law of the place of contracting and so a judgment rendered under …
Corporations-Basis For Preemptive Rights
Corporations-Basis For Preemptive Rights
Michigan Law Review
Defendant corporation's authorized capital stock consisted of 800 shares of common stock, 76 shares of which remained unissued. Over the objection of the plaintiff, the directors of the corporation authorized the issue of 50 shares of the 76 to a salesman in satisfaction of a debt due him from the corporation, the remaining 26 shares to one of the directors for cash with which to meet corporate indebtedness. No contest for corporate control was afoot. No opportunity was given to the shareholders generally to purchase such shares. Later the faction of the individual defendants to whom said 26 shares had …