Digital Commons Network^™

Insults And Epithets: Are They Protected Speech?, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

It is a privilege to offer a lecture in this series named for Edward J. Bloustein. Not many lecture series honor sitting university presidents who deliver the first lecture in the series; but President Bloustein is the very rare president whose long tenure in office has been accompanied by continuing academic productivity. That achievement is remarkable.

When I tentatively chose this topic a year ago, I knew it involved the application of philosophical insights to serious practical questions, the kind of work that President Bloustein has done so well. I also knew that the search for those aspects of human …

How Law Can Be Determinate, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

This Article, part of a longer study, considers one problem about the objectivity of law. The problem is whether the law as it exists provides determinate answers to many legal questions for judges, other officials, and citizens. I emphasize the word many. This Article does not focus on "hard cases" and then ask whether single correct answers for them exist. It does not inquire whether in some complicated sense all legal questions have determinate answers. This is a treatment of easy legal questions. To most lawyers, it may seem self-evident that many legal questions do have determinate answers; and that …

O'Er The Land Of The Free: Flag Burning As Speech, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

I am honored to lecture at this school, which has a number of friends, and a much larger circle of scholars whose work I admire. I am honored to lecture in the memory of Melville Nimmer, one of the country's leading thinkers on freedom of speech as well as its foremost expert on copyright. I met Professor Nimmer only once, at a lunch with Vince Blasi. My recollection of the lunch is distinct. Gently and in the most friendly way, but with irrefutable logic, they showed me that a position I had held for more than a decade about immigration …

The Duty Of Directors To Non-Shareholder Constituencies In Control Transactions: A Comparison Of U.S. And U.K. Law, Roberta S. Karmel

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Duty Of Directors To Non-Shareholder Constituencies In Control Transactions-A Comparison Of U.S. And U.K. Law, Roberta S. Karmel

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Religious Convictions And Political Choice: Some Further Thoughts, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

Let me start by putting my topic in a concrete context. Suppose a statute is offered to relieve animals of the oppressively cramped conditions of modern factory farming. Advocates claim that calves, lambs, pigs, and chickens should have a better quality of life before being slaughtered for food. Opponents argue that factory farming helps provide tasty, inexpensive meat and that farmers should be free to decide how to treat animals that they own. At stake in the decision whether to restrict farmers is some balancing of animal interests against human interests. In our relatively wealthy society the human interests are …

Rethinking Custodial Interrogation, Daniel B. Yeager

Faculty Scholarship

This Article attempts to resurrect a concept crucial to the Supreme Court lexicon. It is not, however, a police manual. This Article concerns itself solely with questions surrounding the admissibility of confessions, and in so doing, attempts to show that only a reconsideration of custodial interrogation can restore the "significant deprivations" language to the status granted it in Miranda v. Arizona.

What Triggers Revlon?, Ronald J. Gilson, Reinier Kraakman

Faculty Scholarship

Delaware's new approach to takeover law is announced in three cases that address different aspects of management's role in the standard drama of defending against a hostile takeover. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co. scripts a main act for the drama by prescribing a duty to compare the outsider's offer with the universe of other options and, if necessary, to resist the outsider within the guidelines fixed by the proportionality test. Moran v. Household International, Inc. writes a prologue by encouraging management to plan a vigorous defense that can thwart a coercive offer without damaging the company. Finally, Revlon …

"Were There No Appeal": The History Of Review In American Criminal Courts, David Rossman

Faculty Scholarship

The contemporary criminal justice system is guided, in large part, from the top down. A great deal of the force that drives the "terrible engine" of the criminal law is supplied by courts that consider cases on review after a defendant has been convicted.

Form And Function In The Administration Of Justice: The Bill Of Rights And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry Yackle

Faculty Scholarship

Part I critiques the Report's insistence that accurate fact finding exhausts, or nearly exhausts, the objectives of criminal justice, identifies the fundamental role of the Bill of Rights in the American political order, and situates federal habeas corpus within that framework. Part II traces the Report's historical review of the federal habeas jurisdiction and critiques the Report's too-convenient reliance on selected materials that, on examination, fail to undermine conventional understandings of the writ's development as a postconviction remedy. Part III responds to the Report's complaints regarding current habeas corpus practice and refutes contentions that the habeas jurisdiction overburdens federal dockets …

Sameness Feminism And The Work/Family Conflict, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Copyright Law And The Myth Of Objectivity: The Idea-Expression Dichotomy And The Inevitability Of Artistic Value Judgments, Amy B. Cohen

Faculty Scholarship

ThIs Article focuses on the problem of how artistic values affect determinatlons of copyright management. It discusses how the copyright statutes embody a congressional desire to have determinations of eligibility for copyright made without regard for the artistic value of the work at issue. This Article also explores the dangers that Justice Holmes and those who have followed hIs lead saw in using assessments of artIstic value to make copyright decIsIons. It also discusses how assessments of artistic value influence copyright infrIngement determInations, specifically through the application of the idea-expression dichotomy, a principle used to determine whether the copyright in …

The Devolution Of The Legal Profession: A Demand Side Perspective, Ronald J. Gilson

Faculty Scholarship

Economic analysis has not played a significant role in the increasingly intense debate over the decline of professionalism among lawyers.Economists' lack of interest in the issue may be understandable. The lawyers' lament is that the legal profession is devolving into the business of law. That this concern has not captured the economists' attention may reflect only that economists do not view the label "business" as a pejorative. If becoming a business means efficiently rendering an important service in a competitive environment, then of what is there to complain?

Lawyers, more directly concerned with maintaining their professional status, would find little …

Mathematical Prescriptions For Relief Of The Public Charity Status Blues, William T. Hutton

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Unrequited Gifts: The Tax Fallout, William T. Hutton

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Anti-Federalist Ninth Amendment And Its Implications For State Constitutional Law, Calvin R. Massey

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Locus Of Sovereignty Judicial Review, Legislative Supremacy, And Federalism In The Constitutional Traditions Of Canada And The United States, Calvin R. Massey

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

"I Didn't Tell Them Anything About You": Implied Assertions As Hearsay Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Roger C. Park

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Comment, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

They Moved Away: Stories Of Location And Relocation, Jo Carrillo

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Important Developments In Exempt Organizations, Stephen Schwarz, Miriam Galston

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Culture And Certainty: Legal History And The Reconstructive Project, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

American Fiduciary Duty In An Age Of Narcissism, Calvin R. Massey

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Toward A Wrongful Termination Statute For California, Joseph R. Grodin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

By What Authority?: Reflections On The Constitutionality And Wisdom Of The Flag Protection Act Of 1989, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Exchange On The Eleventh Amendment, Calvin R. Massey

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judicial Responsibility In Italy: A New Statute, Ugo Mattei

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Impact Of Federal Rule 11 On Lawyers And Judges In The Northern District Of California, Melissa Lee Nelken

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Reforming Jury Trials, William W. Schwarzer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Past, Present And Future In Wrongful Termination Law, Joseph R. Grodin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.