Digital Commons Network^™

Standing And Probabilistic Injury, Curtis Bradley, Ernest Young

Articles

Standing to sue often turns on questions of probability. For example, public law plaintiffs must show that they are likely to be affected by allegedly unlawful government surveillance or environmental policies, and consumers may wish to sue private defendants over false credit reporting or data breaches that may or may not cause them financial or reputational harm in the future. This Article offers a framework for resolving a wide range of these “probabilistic standing” issues. Our core claim is that courts and commentators ask too much of standing doctrine in probabilistic cases. First, scholars sometimes seek a unified theory of …

The Role (And Limits) Of Developmental Neuroscience In Determining Adolescents’ Autonomy Rights: The Case For Reproductive And Voting Rights, Emily Buss, Julie Maslowsky, Laura Wray-Lake

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Bottini Saga: Why Housing Shortages Are Endemic In California, Richard Epstein

Articles

No abstract provided.

Dynamic Diffusion, Adam Chilton, Anu Bradford, Katerina Linos

Articles

Research on legal diffusion typically focuses on laws’ initial adoption and ignores their later evolution. We develop a typology of three subsequent diffusion patterns: convergence, when countries revise laws to move closer to leading regulators; customization, when countries revise laws to move away from leading regulators; and stagnation, when countries cease legislating, leaving initially adopted laws in place. We then propose a general theory suggesting that economic size and geographic distance from leading regulators predict which of the three patterns countries follow. We explore this theory with case studies on the dynamic diffusion of antitrust laws in Russia, Colombia, and …

Real-World Prior Art, Jonathan Masur, Lisa Ouellette

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Magnet School Wars And The Future Of Colorblindness, Sonja Starr

Articles

The Supreme Court’s recent decision striking down the use of race-based classifications in university admissions reflects its growing commitment to the concept of “colorblindness,” which has implications well beyond education. In anticipation, many schools and other actors are already moving toward alternative, facially race-neutral strategies for promoting diversity and reducing racial disparity. But what will happen when those policies too are challenged because they have race-related motives? Will courts soon find all race-conscious policymaking unlawful based on its ends? This is the next stage of the legal battle over colorblindness, and it is already underway.

The first wave of this …

On The Genealogy Of Intimate Digital Harm, Aziz Huq

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Shadow Of The Law Of The Police, Adam Davidson

Articles

No abstract provided.

Measuring Clarity In Legal Text, Jonathan H. Choi

University of Chicago Law Review

Legal cases often turn on judgments of textual clarity: when the text is unclear, judges allow extrinsic evidence in contract disputes, consult legislative history in statutory interpretation, and more. Despite this, almost no empirical work considers the nature or prevalence of legal clarity. Scholars and judges who study real-world documents to inform the interpretation of legal text primarily treat unclear text as a research problem to be solved with more data rather than a fundamental feature of language.

This Article makes both theoretical and empirical contributions to the legal concept of textual clarity. It first advances a theory of clarity …

Power And Politics In Original Jurisdiction, Zachary D. Clopton

University of Chicago Law Review

The original jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court is a topic of scholarly interest but little practical significance. The original jurisdiction of state supreme courts is exactly the opposite—it is virtually absent from the scholarly literature but of significant practical importance. For example, dozens of cases related to elections, COVID-19 responses, and abortion were filed in the original jurisdiction of state supreme courts in the last few years. Legislatures also recognize the importance of original jurisdiction, as state legislators have proposed dozens of recent bills to change the scope of original jurisdiction.

This Article offers a comprehensive review of the …

Predictability And Adaptation In Law And Other Markets (Chapter In A Coming Book: Research Handbook On Law And Time), Saul Levmore

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

People and enterprises that are subject to the law find it useful to know what the law is at present, but then also to anticipate future rules. If laws are stable this is easily done. Stability is more common where the judicial branch is concerned, because precedents are often valued, and for good reason. They are more often followed by judges than by those involved in other methods of lawmaking. But in all of lawmaking, and even in the private sphere, there is value to consistency and certainty. And yet, surprises can be attractive if they are not confronted on …

Lost Time: Paying For Delays Associated With Labor Strikes And Traffic Jams (Chapter In A Coming Book: Research Handbook On Law And Time), Saul Levmore

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Waiting is often costly. In many settings, one party delays to impose costs on another. In other settings, delay yields a small gain while imposing significant costs on others who cannot easily bargain. Where the parties can bargain, at least one expects the other to relent and to bring about a settlement that is mutually beneficial. Inasmuch as time offers the opportunity to gather information, compare alternatives, and reach yet better bargains, law does not and should not simply discourage all delays. On the other hand, it is often the case that when parties delay before reaching a bargain, they …

Which Constitutional Provisions Are Most Important?, Richard Albert, Netta Barak Corren, Daniel M. Brinks, Adam Chilton, Rosalind Dixon, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, Ran Hirschl, David Landau, Ashley Moran, Yvonne Tew, Mila Versteeg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

National constitutions codify provisions on a wide range of topics, ranging from presidential term limits to the country’s flag. But are all constitutional provisions equally important? Some are likely to be particularly consequential for how governments function, while others are likely to be largely symbolic. To date, there has been little research on the relative importance of constitutional provisions. To explore current thinking on this subject, we assembled a group of twelve comparative constitutional scholars to rate the relative importance of 340 constitutional provisions to the functioning of a country’s government. These aggregate ratings make three contributions to constitutional studies: …

The Comparative Constitutional Design Of Elections, Parties And Voting, Tom Ginsburg, Aziz Z. Huq, Tarunabh Khaitan

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

We develop a measure of student-professor ideological concordance based on the share of faculty members who are more liberal than the students at a given school. We then use data on the ideology of students and professors in American law schools over more than a twenty-year period to estimate the degree of ideological concordance in the legal academy. We find that as professors have become more liberal over time, their students have become even more liberal. The result is that ideological concordance has increased over time and that by 2010 the average law student actually attended a law school with …

Originalism's Selection Problem, Darrell A.H. Miller

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Originalism is called a “family” of theories. If that’s true, they all suffer from a congenital malady: the problem of selection. This vulnerability afflicts every branch of the family, whether we speak of original intentions originalism, original public meaning originalism, original methods originalism, or original law originalism—any originalism that descends from Attorney General Ed Meese’s legendary speech before the American Bar Association in 1985.2 To the extent originalism of any variety purports to make descriptive, falsifiable claims about language, history, tra- dition, practice, or law, all of them must confront problems common to any empirical project—what data to collect, how …

The Law Of Information States: Evidence From China And The United States, Bridget Fahey, Yuping Lin, Taisu Zhang

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Government could not function—legally, administratively, or politically—without producing information about the population, the economy, crime, elections, public health, and more. This Article theorizes the informational incentives of political and administrative officials and the legal interventions that can control them. It then uses case studies in the United States and China to illustrate those informational dynamics in practice. Our account reveals a novel form of information regulation: government structure and, in particular, the vertical division of informational powers between levels of government, or “informational federalism.” We describe the use of informational federalism and its distinctive functions as part of the portfolio …

Kalven For Corporations: Should For-Profit Corporations Adopt Public Statement Policies?, Anthony Casey, Tom Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

In the last few years, corporations have been called upon to take public positions on myriad issues unconnected to core business concerns. Demands for public statements may arise from various stakeholders, as well as from the general public and the media. Sometimes such statements are uncontroversial, but other times, firms find themselves in a no-win position, in which both silence and voice will offend some core constituency. Crafting meaningful public-facing statements becomes a major challenge.

In this article, we ask whether these corporations should adopt some form of express upfront policy on when they will and when they will not …

Criminal Procedure In A Time Of Abolition, Adam Davidson

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

As the ranks of prison industrial complex abolitionists grow, the question of whether, and if so how, they should engage with criminal procedure doctrine becomes ever more pressing. This Essay engages Devon W. Carbado’s Unreasonable: Black Lives, Police Power, and the Fourth Amendment’s interrogation of whether to “blame” Chief Justice Warren for the expansion of the carceral state brought on by his opinion in Terry v. Ohio to begin exploring that question. It argues that while a laser-like focus on doctrine betrays an individual-focused theory of change that is likely to be both ineffective and anathema to abolitionist praxis, abolitionists …

Asking Gpt For The Ordinary Meaning Of Statutory Terms, Christoph Engel, Richard H. Mcadams

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

We report on our test of the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT (GPT) as a tool for generating evidence of the ordinary meaning of statutory terms. We explain why the most useful evidence for interpretation involves a distribution of replies rather than only what GPT regards as the single “best” reply. That motivates our decision to use Chat 3.5 Turbo instead of Chat 4 and to run each prompt we use 100 times. Asking GPT whether the statutory term “vehicle” includes a list of candidate objects (e.g., bus, bicycle, skateboard) allows us to test it against a benchmark, the results …

The Common Political Foundations Of Originalism And Cost-Benefit Analysis, Jonathan S. Masur, Eric A. Posner

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and originalism are rarely discussed together, and seem to belong to different worlds of legal scholarship. The two methods are used by different institutions in different spheres of law for different purposes; what could they have in common? Nothing, or so it would seem. Yet closer inspection reveals surprising commonalities—both in terms of structure and function, on the one hand, and in historical pedigree and political economy, on the other. CBA and originalism are what we will call midlevel legal methods. Midlevel legal methods are neither normative commitments nor legal doctrines, but recurrently used methodologies that are …

Private Security And Public Police, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport, Michael Berg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Private security officers outnumber police by a wide margin, and the gap may be growing. As cities have claimed to defund the police, many have quietly expanded their use of private security, reallocating spending from the public to the private sector. It is difficult to know what to make of these trends, largely because we know so little about what private security looks like on the ground. On one prevalent view of the facts, a shift from public to private security would mean little more than a change of uniform, as the two labor markets are deeply intertwined. Indeed, academics, …

The Trouble With Classifications, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The Supreme Court relies increasingly on anti-classification rules to implement the Constitution’s commands of even-handed state treatment. These rules direct attention to whether an instance of a forbidden classification is present on the face of a challenged law. They contain two necessary steps. First, a court defines a general category of impermissible terms. Second, a court ascertains whether an instance of the category is found in enacted text—triggering the familiar strict scrutiny analysis. So defined, anti-classification rules now dominate Equal Protection, Free Speech, ‘dormant’ Commerce Clause, and even Free Exercise jurisprudence. The Roberts Court celebrates them as “commonsense,” citing their …

Administrative Enslavement, Adam Davidson

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

There are currently over a million people enslaved in the United States. Under threat of horrendous punishment, they cook, clean, and even fight fires. They do this not in the shadow of the law but with the express blessing of the Thirteenth Amendment’s Except Clause, which permits enslavement and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime.

Despite discussions of this exception in law reviews, news reports, and Netflix documentaries, few commentators have recognized that this enslavement happens silently. No prosecutor, judge, or defense attorney tells convicted people that they will be enslaved as punishment for their crime. It is only …

An Apa For Tax, David A. Weisbach

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Recent Supreme Court cases threaten to upend the administrative law applicable to the tax system. Loper Bright eliminates Chevron deference. Ohio v. EPA heightens the scrutiny given to regulatory preambles. And Corner Post effectively eliminates the statute of limitations for challenging the validity regulations. A number of lower court decisions move in the same direction, aggressively using administrative law to invalidate guidance. Combined, these decisions threaten to make issuing guidance much more difficult and to slow the guidance process.

These decisions are based on the Administrative Procedure Act or related statutes rather than constitutional principles. Therefore, to the extent that …

Bootstrapped: A (Qualified) Defense Of Practice-Based Constitutional Argument, Alma Diamond

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

We have our Constitution in common, even if we share very little else. This, at least, is a core tenet of our constitutional order: that we share in a single framework of duties and entitlements despite our underlying moral, political, and philosophical differences. But is it really possible to occupy a shared legal world if we live in very different moral, political and philosophical worlds? This is the question raised by deeply consequential constitutional controversies in an increasingly polarized society. It is a question about the basis of, and justification for, constitutional law. Is our constitutional law ultimately a matter …

Admissions Essays After Sffa, Sonja B. Starr

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The Supreme Court concluded its 2023 decision barring affirmative action in university admissions with a qualification: although they may not give weight to “race qua race,” universities may consider individual applicants’ discussion of race-related life experience that bears on their strengths and potential. This “essay carveout” provides a potential path forward for universities (and other entities to which the affirmative-action ban may eventually apply). But the Court also warned against using it to enact “indirect” affirmative action, and legal advocates of colorblindness stand poised to challenge any use of essays that appears to stray over this line. So where is …

Unwritten Administrative Law And The Regulatory Last Mile, Anthony B. Derron

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Programs like the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act are ostensibly federal. But once they change hands from national to subnational, they’re implemented through state statutes and regulations, not direct enforcement of the United States Code. As a result, state, not federal, administrative law governs in many bread-and-butter situations. Through a comprehensive fifty- state survey, I find that this body of law is largely unwritten.

Yet cooperative federalism relies on the capacity of state institutions to function. And equally critical is the existence of law that shepherds a program from congressional subcommittee to the …

Structural Logics Of Presidential Disqualification: An Essay On Trump V. Anderson, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This Comment analyzes the Trump v. Anderson per curiam on its own terms, and by the criteria generically employed by the Court in other rulings. I untangle and then closely evaluate three distinct structural logics upon which the Court’s holding rests. These logic sound in terms of the registers (roughly speaking) of federalism, the separation of powers, and democracy. Because the first two founds prove incoherent, I show that the opinion ultimately rests on an (unpersuasive) logic of democratic defense. The disqualification shares this foundation with the Court’s subsequent immunity decision, which is also briefly discussed. Both judgments, I show, …

The Sweep And Force Of Section Three, William Baude, Michael Stokes Paulsen

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal consequences have not been appreciated or enforced. This Article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.

First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by …

Which Constitutional Provisions Are Most Important?, Richard Albert, Netta Barak-Corren, Daniel M. Brinks, Adam Chilton, Rosalind Dixon, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, Ran Hirschl, David Landau, Ashley Moran, Yvonne Tew, Mila Versteeg

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

National constitutions codify provisions on a wide range of topics, ranging from presidential term limits to the country’s flag. But are all constitutional provisions equally important? Some are likely to be particularly consequential for how governments function, while others are likely to be largely symbolic. To date, there has been little research on the relative importance of constitutional provisions. To explore current thinking on this subject, we assembled a group of twelve comparative constitutional scholars to rate the relative importance of 340 constitutional pro- visions to the functioning of a country’s government. These aggregate ratings make three contributions to constitutional …