Digital Commons Network^™

The Trouble With Classifications, Aziz Huq

Articles

The Supreme Court relies increasingly on anticlassification rules to implement the Constitution’s various commands of evenhanded state treatment. These rules direct attention to whether an instance of a forbidden classification is present on the face of a challenged law. They contain two necessary steps. First, a court defines a general category of impermissible terms. Second, a court ascertains whether an instance of the category is found in enacted text—so triggering the familiar strict scrutiny analysis. So defined, anticlassification rules now dominate equal protection, free speech, “dormant” Commerce Clause, and even free exercise jurisprudence. The Roberts Court celebrates these doctrinal tests …

Bankruptcy By Another Name, Anthony Casey, Joshua Macey

Articles

In a recent essay, Abbe R. Gluck, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, and Adam S. Zimmerman object to the increasing use of bankruptcy to resolve mass-tort claims. They and others are concerned that bankruptcy reduces plaintiff voice, impedes the development of state law remedies, and limits discovery that can drive state and federal regulatory interventions. This Response addresses these critiques. Contrary to popular descriptions of the bankruptcy system, bankruptcy courts do not simply aim to maximize economic efficiency and financial recoveries. Bankruptcy includes numerous procedures, including robust disclosure, bellwether trials, future-claims representatives, and voting, to ensure a fair process and promote noneconomic …

Private Security And Public Police, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport, Michael Berg

Articles

Private security officers outnumber police by a wide margin, and the gap may be growing. As cities have claimed to defund the police, many have quietly expanded their use of private security, reallocating spending from the public to the private sector. It is difficult to know what to make of these trends, largely because we know so little about what private security looks like on the ground. On one prevalent view of the facts, a shift from public to private security would mean little more than a change of uniform, as the two labor markets are deeply intertwined. Indeed, academics, …

Layered Constitutionalism, Payvand Ahdout, Bridget Fahey

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Fourteenth Amendment And The Vénus Noire, Farah Peterson

Articles

No abstract provided.

Technology, Tradition, And “The Terror Of The People”, Darrell Miller, Alexandra Filindra, Noah Kaplan

Articles

In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, the Supreme Court man- dated a text, history, tradition, and analogy–only approach to Second Amendment cases.

No longer can policymakers rely on empirical data alone to carry their litigation burden. Now such data must conform to a still-emerging “historical tradition of fire- arm regulation” to meet constitutional muster. Some despair that reams of data, careful experiments, and rigorous statistical analyses no longer have any relevance to the gun debate.

But those that claim that Bruen signals the end of empirically grounded policy solutions badly misread the opinion. Empirical studies can …

Secrecy By Stipulation, Nora Freeman, David Freeman, Jonah Gelbach, Austin Peters, Aaron Schaffer-Neitz

Articles

GM Ignition Switch. Dalkon Shield. Oxycontin. For decades, protective orders—court orders that require parties to maintain the confidentiality of information unearthed during discovery—have hid deadly defects and pervasive abuse from the public, perpetuating unnecessary harm.

But how worrisome are these protective orders, really? Under Rule 26(c)’s plain language, protective orders are to be granted only upon a showing of “good cause.” Doesn’t that adequately cabin the orders’ entry? Prominent judges and scholars have long insisted it does, and that, under Rule 26(c), the day-to-day grant of protective orders is careful, not cavalier. Critics disagree. They charge that parties frequently agree …

Imputing Unreported Hate Crimes Using Google Search Data, Aziz Huq, Dhammika Dharmapala

Articles

U.S. law requires the Attorney General to collect data on hate crime victimization from states and municipalities, but states and localities are under no obligation to cooperate by gathering or sharing information. Data production hence varies considerably across jurisdictions. This paper addresses the ensuing “missing data” problem by imputing unreported hate crimes using Google search rates for a racial epithet. It uses two alternative benchmarks for which jurisdictions more effectively collect hate crime data: all states that were not part of the erstwhile Confederacy, and those states with statutory provisions relating to hate crime reporting. We regress rates of racially-motivated …

Brown V. Board Of Education Why Do We Need Constitutional Rights?, Geoffrey Stone

Articles

No abstract provided.

Moves & Rules: Addressing The Puzzle Of Social Rule-Following, Alma Diamond

Articles

I explore a puzzle at the heart of the so-called ‘practice theory of rules’: how can rules, operating as normative standards, be determined by the very actions they govern? I demonstrate how this puzzle has shaped criticism of the practice theory and limited its ability to account for mistake and disagreement within social practices. I identify the reason for these difficulties: an exclusive focus on individual deliberative attitudes which ignores the dynamic interaction between plural and individual deliberation within social practices. Drawing on recent work in social ontology, I construct a framework to capture this dynamism. I distinguish between two …

Free Speech On The Internet: The Crisis Of Epistemic Authority, Brian Leiter

Articles

No abstract provided.

Redistribution With Political Constraints: Legal Rules Compared To Taxes And Transfers, David Weisbach

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Consequences And Constitutionality Of Training Police To Blame Victims, Richard Mcadams, Margareth Etienne

Articles

No abstract provided.

Asking Gpt For The Ordinary Meaning Of Statutory Terms, Richard Mcadams, Christoph Engel

Articles

No abstract provided.

Machine-Learning Human Rights, Han-Wei Ho, Patrick Chung-Chia, Nuno Garoupa, Martin Wells, Yun-Chien Chang, Tom Ginsburg

Articles

Utilizing a comprehensive panel dataset spanning from 1900 to 2020, this study introduces an innovative methodology for the analysis and categorization of legal documents, specifically national constitutions. Contrary to the predominant reliance on unsupervised methods within the field, this research incorporates a supervised machine-learning approach, notably the SEMMS method, alongside traditional unsupervised algorithms. This dual approach facilitates a nuanced analysis of the human rights provisions contained within national constitutions, resulting in the identification of both traditional and novel constitutional groupings. Broadly speaking, the more traditional common law-civil law divide does not seem particularly relevant in this context. Furthermore, our methodology …

Can Machines Commit Crimes Under U.S. Antitrust Laws?, Aslihan Asil, Thomas G. Wollmann

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

Generative artificial intelligence is being rapidly deployed for corporate tasks including pricing. Suppose one of these machines communicates with the pricing manager of a competing firm, proposes to collude, receives assent, and raises price. Is this a crime under U.S. antitrust laws, and, if so, who is liable? Based on the observed behavior of the most widely adopted large language model, we argue that this conduct is imminent, satisfies the requirements for agreement and intent under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and could confer criminal liability to both firms as well as the pricing manager of the competing firm.

“Killer Acquisitions” Reexamined: Economic Hyperbole In The Age Of Populist Antitrust, Jonathan M. Barnett

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

Major competition regulators, and substantial portions of the scholarly community, have rapidly adopted the view that “killer acquisitions” and “kill zones” constitute significant sources of competitive risk arising from incumbent acquisitions of emerging firms in digital markets. Based on this view, policymakers in the United States, European Union, and other jurisdictions have advocated for, and in some cases have taken, substantial changes to merger review policies that would erect significant obstacles to incumbent/startup acquisitions. A review of the relevant body of evidence finds that these widely-held views concerning incumbent/startup acquisitions rest on meager support, confined to ambiguous evidence drawn from …

Insider Abstention And Rule 10b5-1 Plans, David Rosenfeld

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

Company insiders will typically be in possession of material non-public information (MNPI) about their companies. In order to allow insiders the opportunity to trade, the SEC adopted Rule 10b5-1, which provides an affirmative defense to insider trading liability if the trades are made pursuant to a written plan or trading instruction entered into when the trader was not aware of MNPI. Over the years, there has been considerable concern that insiders were abusing Rule 10b5-1 plans by adopting plans just prior to trading, adopting multiple plans, or even terminating plans when they turned out to be unprofitable. The SEC recently …

Corporate Governance And Risk-Taking: A Statistical Approach, Steven L. Schwarcz

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

Because prudent corporate governance often requires managers to take risks based on statistically expected outcomes, corporate failures that have a small but finite chance of occurring cannot always be prevented. This Article makes three related claims about risk-taking in corporate governance.

This Article’s first claim is that managers should not automatically be presumed to be at fault for corporate failures that result from risk-taking decisions based on statistical methodologies that reasonably justify the decisions ex ante. Conceptually, the business judgment rule should protect corporate managers for engaging in a reasonable decision-making process, including one that is statistically based. Jurisdictionally, however, …

The Ascertainable Standards That Define The Boundaries Of The Sec’S Rulemaking Authority, Bernard S. Sharfman

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

On the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the “major questions” doctrine quickly came to be perceived as a significant impediment to the finalization of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proposed rule on climate-related disclosures.

This Article presents a new argument against finalization, an argument that does not require the application of the major questions doctrine. This argument finds its authority in the policy objectives and the one policy constraint found in the statutes that underlie the proposed rule. These policy standards, referred to as ascertainable standards in the Article, not only …

Predictability And Adaptation In Law And Other Markets (Chapter In A Coming Book: Research Handbook On Law And Time), Saul Levmore

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

People and enterprises that are subject to the law find it useful to know what the law is at present, but then also to anticipate future rules. If laws are stable this is easily done. Stability is more common where the judicial branch is concerned, because precedents are often valued, and for good reason. They are more often followed by judges than by those involved in other methods of lawmaking. But in all of lawmaking, and even in the private sphere, there is value to consistency and certainty. And yet, surprises can be attractive if they are not confronted on …

Kalven For Corporations: Should For-Profit Corporations Adopt Public Statement Policies?, Anthony Casey, Tom Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

In the last few years, corporations have been called upon to take public positions on myriad issues unconnected to core business concerns. Demands for public statements may arise from various stakeholders, as well as from the general public and the media. Sometimes such statements are uncontroversial, but other times, firms find themselves in a no-win position, in which both silence and voice will offend some core constituency. Crafting meaningful public-facing statements becomes a major challenge.

In this article, we ask whether these corporations should adopt some form of express upfront policy on when they will and when they will not …

Which Constitutional Provisions Are Most Important?, Richard Albert, Netta Barak Corren, Daniel M. Brinks, Adam Chilton, Rosalind Dixon, Zachary Elkins, Tom Ginsburg, Ran Hirschl, David Landau, Ashley Moran, Yvonne Tew, Mila Versteeg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

National constitutions codify provisions on a wide range of topics, ranging from presidential term limits to the country’s flag. But are all constitutional provisions equally important? Some are likely to be particularly consequential for how governments function, while others are likely to be largely symbolic. To date, there has been little research on the relative importance of constitutional provisions. To explore current thinking on this subject, we assembled a group of twelve comparative constitutional scholars to rate the relative importance of 340 constitutional provisions to the functioning of a country’s government. These aggregate ratings make three contributions to constitutional studies: …

Disfavored Supreme Court Precedent In The Lower Federal Courtscurtis Bradley, Curtis Bradley, Tara Leigh Grove

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

There has been significant debate in recent years about the stare decisis effect of Supreme Court decisions, prompted in large part by the overturning of Roe v. Wade and, more recently, by the overturning of Chevron. Almost all of this debate has concerned whether the Court should adhere to its own decisions, a matter of "horizontal" stare decisis. But potentially even more significant is the "vertical" effect of Supreme Court precedent on the lower courts, which handle almost all of the federal judicial business. If the Supreme Court expressly overturns a precedent, the lower courts will of course stop following …

A New Measure Of Surviving Children That Sheds Light On Long-Term Trends In Fertility, Anup Malani, Ari Jacob

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The consequences of fertility decline flow primarily from reduction in the number of surviving children, i.e., both births and survival, not simply from reductions in births. Therefore, neoclassical economic theories that attempt to explain fertility decline (e.g., quantity-quality models) hinge on preferences for surviving children, not births per se. This paper provides a new measure of surviving children. Effective fertility rate (EFR) is the product of the current fertility rate and the projected probability that a child survives until some age A. This age A could be between 15-49 for a measure (EFRR) that tracks reproductive potential, or 15-65 for …

Private Security And Public Police, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport, Michael Berg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Private security officers outnumber police by a wide margin, and the gap may be growing. As cities have claimed to defund the police, many have quietly expanded their use of private security, reallocating spending from the public to the private sector. It is difficult to know what to make of these trends, largely because we know so little about what private security looks like on the ground. On one prevalent view of the facts, a shift from public to private security would mean little more than a change of uniform, as the two labor markets are deeply intertwined. Indeed, academics, …

Structural Logics Of Presidential Disqualification: An Essay On Trump V. Anderson, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This Comment analyzes the Trump v. Anderson per curiam on its own terms, and by the criteria generically employed by the Court in other rulings. I untangle and then closely evaluate three distinct structural logics upon which the Court’s holding rests. These logic sound in terms of the registers (roughly speaking) of federalism, the separation of powers, and democracy. Because the first two founds prove incoherent, I show that the opinion ultimately rests on an (unpersuasive) logic of democratic defense. The disqualification shares this foundation with the Court’s subsequent immunity decision, which is also briefly discussed. Both judgments, I show, …

The Trouble With Classifications, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The Supreme Court relies increasingly on anti-classification rules to implement the Constitution’s commands of even-handed state treatment. These rules direct attention to whether an instance of a forbidden classification is present on the face of a challenged law. They contain two necessary steps. First, a court defines a general category of impermissible terms. Second, a court ascertains whether an instance of the category is found in enacted text—triggering the familiar strict scrutiny analysis. So defined, anti-classification rules now dominate Equal Protection, Free Speech, ‘dormant’ Commerce Clause, and even Free Exercise jurisprudence. The Roberts Court celebrates them as “commonsense,” citing their …

Administrative Enslavement, Adam Davidson

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

There are currently over a million people enslaved in the United States. Under threat of horrendous punishment, they cook, clean, and even fight fires. They do this not in the shadow of the law but with the express blessing of the Thirteenth Amendment’s Except Clause, which permits enslavement and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime.

Despite discussions of this exception in law reviews, news reports, and Netflix documentaries, few commentators have recognized that this enslavement happens silently. No prosecutor, judge, or defense attorney tells convicted people that they will be enslaved as punishment for their crime. It is only …

An Apa For Tax, David A. Weisbach

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Recent Supreme Court cases threaten to upend the administrative law applicable to the tax system. Loper Bright eliminates Chevron deference. Ohio v. EPA heightens the scrutiny given to regulatory preambles. And Corner Post effectively eliminates the statute of limitations for challenging the validity regulations. A number of lower court decisions move in the same direction, aggressively using administrative law to invalidate guidance. Combined, these decisions threaten to make issuing guidance much more difficult and to slow the guidance process.

These decisions are based on the Administrative Procedure Act or related statutes rather than constitutional principles. Therefore, to the extent that …