Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1409)
- Universitas Indonesia (872)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (718)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (654)
- University of Richmond (507)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (484)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (480)
- Seattle University School of Law (349)
- University of Colorado Law School (342)
- Pepperdine University (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (286)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (265)
- William & Mary Law School (256)
- UIC School of Law (251)
- University of Georgia School of Law (230)
- Duke Law (215)
- American University Washington College of Law (208)
- Brigham Young University Law School (197)
- Georgetown University Law Center (184)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (170)
- Fordham Law School (148)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (140)
- Cleveland State University (135)
- New York Law School (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (120)
- West Virginia University (119)
- St. Mary's University (116)
- University of Maine School of Law (113)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (112)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (840)
- Supreme Court (689)
- United States Supreme Court (446)
- Federal courts (416)
- Constitution (381)
-
- Judges (358)
- Judicial review (279)
- Jurisdiction (262)
- Federal (259)
- Constitutional law (255)
- State courts (243)
- New York (220)
- Congress (205)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Due process (185)
- Jurisprudence (164)
- State (154)
- Federal Courts (153)
- Separation of powers (150)
- United States (150)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (145)
- Evidence (142)
- Litigation (139)
- Sixth Amendment (135)
- Discrimination (134)
- Juries (128)
- Statutory interpretation (128)
- Law reform (123)
- Law (122)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (737)
- Michigan Law Review (705)
- Tennessee Law Review (651)
- Faculty Scholarship (580)
- Indiana Law Journal (453)
-
- Touro Law Review (453)
- Articles (425)
- Faculty Publications (337)
- University of Richmond Law Review (302)
- Seattle University Law Review (282)
- Pepperdine Law Review (231)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (223)
- Cardozo Law Review (206)
- UIC Law Review (204)
- Law Faculty Publications (186)
- Journal Articles (154)
- Faculty Articles (149)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (145)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (142)
- Scholarly Works (135)
- BYU Law Review (134)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Publications (121)
- Court Briefs (119)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (113)
- Maine Law Review (106)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (104)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (100)
- American University Law Review (99)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 12331 - 12360 of 12605
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
Washington Law Review
During these times of renewed interest in the defects in our judicial procedure, probably the most sweeping and far-reaching reform proposed is to give the rule-making power to our courts. The exact form of the proposal differs with the conditions in various jurisdictions, but the proposed acts generally provide that the highest appellate court of the jurisdiction shall regulate and prescribe, by rule, the forms for and the kind and character of the entire pleading, practice and procedure to be used in all suits, actions, appeals and proceedings of whatever nature in any of the courts of the state, superseding …
Judicial Settlement And The Permanent Court Of International Justice, Amos S. Hershey
Judicial Settlement And The Permanent Court Of International Justice, Amos S. Hershey
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Early Tennessee Surveys And Maps, F. Giddings, M. D. Arnold Jr.
Early Tennessee Surveys And Maps, F. Giddings, M. D. Arnold Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Technical Rules Of Evidence, Irving Lehman
Burden Of Proof Of Due Course Holding Under Negotiable Instruments Law, Walter E. Treanor
Burden Of Proof Of Due Course Holding Under Negotiable Instruments Law, Walter E. Treanor
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Permanent International Court Of Criminal Justice, By M. Caloyanni, James J. Robinson
Permanent International Court Of Criminal Justice, By M. Caloyanni, James J. Robinson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Federal Probationary Powers, Eugene B. Cochran
Federal Probationary Powers, Eugene B. Cochran
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Congress And The Supreme Court (Continued), Thomas Frank Konop
Congress And The Supreme Court (Continued), Thomas Frank Konop
Journal Articles
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constitutional amendment that would enable Congress to override judicial review by reenacting a statute. Such an amendment would, of course, run in stark contrast to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This paper explores nature of this proposed amendment and analyzes the implications of overturning the foundation of judicial power in our tripartite system of government. In sum, the author suggests that judicial review serves as an excellent check on Congress and the temporary passions of the public itself.
Congress And The Supreme Court, Thomas Frank Konop
Congress And The Supreme Court, Thomas Frank Konop
Journal Articles
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constitutional amendment that would enable Congress to override judicial review by reenacting a statute. Such an amendment would, of course, run in stark contrast to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This paper explores nature of this proposed amendment and analyzes the implications of overturning the foundation of judicial power in our tripartite system of government. In sum, the author suggests that judicial review serves as an excellent check on Congress and the temporary passions of the public itself.
International Law--Witholding Of Political Recognition--Suit By Russian Corporation In Court Of Equity, Edwin D. Dickinson
International Law--Witholding Of Political Recognition--Suit By Russian Corporation In Court Of Equity, Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
"The plaintiff corporation was incorporated in Russia under the Imperial government. Prior to the Russian Revolution it had deposited certain securities and moneys with the defendant, as trustee, as required by the New York statutes, for the protection of policy-holders and creditors. In this suit to compel the return of the funds the defendant claimed that the plaintiff corporation was no longer in existence because of the Russian Soviet decrees.... Held, that although the court cannot recognize the legal validity of the decrees of the Soviet government, the facts of the situation are such that justice and reason require …
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Compulsory Arbitration Under Kansas Industrial Relations Act
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Compulsory Arbitration Under Kansas Industrial Relations Act
Michigan Law Review
Another interesting chapter has been written in the legal history of the Kansas Court of Industrial Relations, that most interesting attempt to substitute judicial methods for the present condition of strife in the field of industrial dispute, and to recognize the rights of the public as an interested third party in such disputes. In Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, U. S. Sup. Ct., Oct. Term, 1924, Nos. 207 and 299, 45 S. Ct. Rep. 441, the Supreme Court of the United States has decided that the Industrial Relations Act, c. 29, LAWS 1920 (KANSAS), SPECIAL SESSION, …
The Russian Reinsurance Case, Edwin D. Dickinson
The Russian Reinsurance Case, Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
Professor Dickinson's second commentary on Russian Reinsurance Company v. Stoddard and Bankers Trust Company: "The facts in the Russian Reinsurance Company case were without precedent. The Reinsurance Company had been incorporated in Russia in 1899 under a special statute constituting its charter and by-laws.... In 1917 the revolutionary Soviet Government was established in Russia and seven of the eight persons constituting the company's board of directors was driven into exile. In 1918 Soviet decrees nationalized the company, confiscated its property, and apparently terminated its corporate existence. Nevertheless, the exiled directors held meetings in Paris and continued to direct the …
Cooperation Between The Bar And The Public In Improving The Administration Of Justice, Edson R. Sunderland
Cooperation Between The Bar And The Public In Improving The Administration Of Justice, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
Professor Sunderland compares public participation in the legal systems of the United States and Great Britain. "There must be a partnership between the profession and the laity for improving the administration of justice. Law must become a matter of public concern, and not treated as a mere perquisite of a professional class."
Arbitration Under The Modern Statutes
Arbitration Under The Modern Statutes
Michigan Law Review
Of late years the way of the "fair and free trial in open court," to which every man is deemed to have an inalienable right, has become so long, devious, intricate and costly, that the law faces the danger of falling into general disrepute. The calendars of courts in most jurisdictions ·are crowded and filled for months and years in advance. the situation being most acute in the larger cities and commercial centers. the very places where delays are most undesirable. New York City serves as a horrible example-here an ordinary case generally takes three years to come to trial. …
The Judicial Review Of Executive Acts, Albert Levitt
The Judicial Review Of Executive Acts, Albert Levitt
Michigan Law Review
The relation of the judiciary to the executive branch of the Government is a perplexing one. According to the Constitution, the government of the United States is threefold in character, legislative, executive and judicial. Each of these is supposed to be independent of the others. One cannot usurp the function of any one of the others. At the same time, this is a "Government of laws and not of men." It is equally true that this is a government of laws and not of political subdivisions or of the subdivisions of governmental mechanisms. Legislators, executives and judiciary must abide by …
Editorial Section - Case Notes
The Conflict Of Laws - Treatment Of Cases Involving Contractual Capacity, Raymond J. Heilman
The Conflict Of Laws - Treatment Of Cases Involving Contractual Capacity, Raymond J. Heilman
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The World Court, John L. Whitaker
Constitutional Law-Jury Trial For Contempt-Constitutionality Of Clayton Act
Constitutional Law-Jury Trial For Contempt-Constitutionality Of Clayton Act
Michigan Law Review
The defendants, striking employees of a railway company, were proceeded against in a federal district court for contempt in violating a preliminary injunction, and demanded a jury trial under the Clayton Act (c. 323, 38 STAT. 738, sec. 21, 22), which provides that in cases of wilful disobedience of "any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of any District court of the United States or any court of the District of Columbia by doing any act or thing" forbidden, if such act or thing also constitutes a criminal offense under any statute of the United States or law …
Important Changes In Federal Appellate Jurisdiction, C. R. S.
Important Changes In Federal Appellate Jurisdiction, C. R. S.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legislation And Judicial Decision, Rudolf Stammler
Legislation And Judicial Decision, Rudolf Stammler
Michigan Law Review
The discussions of the theme indicated by the title usually start from Montesquieu's theory of the three powers. This famous doctrine is developed in his work "De 1' esprit des lois" (1748) Bk. II, Ch. 6. This chapter is entitled "Of the English Constitution". It discusses however all states in general. In every state there are three sorts of powers, the legislative authority, the executive authority in matters dependent upon the law of nations, and the executive authority in everything dependent upon civil law. The last Montesquieu calls the judicial power, while the one mentioned in the second place is …
Editorial Section - Case Notes
Land Laws In Tennessee (Con't), L. D. Smith
Land Laws In Tennessee (Con't), L. D. Smith
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.