Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1409)
- Universitas Indonesia (872)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (718)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (654)
- University of Richmond (507)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (484)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (480)
- Seattle University School of Law (349)
- University of Colorado Law School (342)
- Pepperdine University (301)
- Notre Dame Law School (286)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (265)
- William & Mary Law School (256)
- UIC School of Law (251)
- University of Georgia School of Law (230)
- Duke Law (215)
- American University Washington College of Law (208)
- Brigham Young University Law School (197)
- Georgetown University Law Center (184)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (173)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (170)
- Fordham Law School (148)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (140)
- Cleveland State University (135)
- New York Law School (134)
- University of Washington School of Law (120)
- West Virginia University (119)
- St. Mary's University (116)
- University of Maine School of Law (113)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (112)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (840)
- Supreme Court (689)
- United States Supreme Court (446)
- Federal courts (416)
- Constitution (381)
-
- Judges (358)
- Judicial review (279)
- Jurisdiction (262)
- Federal (259)
- Constitutional law (255)
- State courts (243)
- New York (220)
- Congress (205)
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Due process (185)
- Jurisprudence (164)
- State (154)
- Federal Courts (153)
- Separation of powers (150)
- United States (150)
- Federalism (147)
- First Amendment (145)
- Evidence (142)
- Litigation (139)
- Sixth Amendment (135)
- Discrimination (134)
- Juries (128)
- Statutory interpretation (128)
- Law reform (123)
- Law (122)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (737)
- Michigan Law Review (705)
- Tennessee Law Review (651)
- Faculty Scholarship (580)
- Indiana Law Journal (453)
-
- Touro Law Review (453)
- Articles (425)
- Faculty Publications (337)
- University of Richmond Law Review (302)
- Seattle University Law Review (282)
- Pepperdine Law Review (231)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (223)
- Cardozo Law Review (206)
- UIC Law Review (204)
- Law Faculty Publications (186)
- Journal Articles (154)
- Faculty Articles (149)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (145)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (142)
- Scholarly Works (135)
- BYU Law Review (134)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Publications (121)
- Court Briefs (119)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (113)
- Maine Law Review (106)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (104)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (100)
- American University Law Review (99)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 12301 - 12330 of 12606
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Burden Of Proving Contributory Negligence, Albert A. White
Burden Of Proving Contributory Negligence, Albert A. White
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Uniform Law Procedure In Federal Courts, Conner Hall
Uniform Law Procedure In Federal Courts, Conner Hall
West Virginia Law Review
A great drive is being made for the passage of a bill for investing the Supreme Court with power to prescribe rules of procedure for law actions in the Federal Courts. A committee of the American Bar Association, or perhaps rather a small number of a committee, has been active in propaganda work for the proposed legislation. Great names have been invoked, and meetings of the Bar Association and lawyers have been passing resolutions in favor of the bill, but the very unanimity with which some of these resolutions have been passed confirms a natural belief that the action was …
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
Sidelights On The Permanent Court Of International Justice, Ake Hammarskjold
Sidelights On The Permanent Court Of International Justice, Ake Hammarskjold
Michigan Law Review
In bidding you welcome, in the name of the Permanent Court of International Justice, in this room where that great institution holds its public meetings and pronounces its judgments and opinions, my first word should be, I think, one of regret-regret that a more worthy representative of the Court has not been able to receive you here today. And I daresay that the President of the Court, who would have been the obvious person to welcome you, shares those regrets,-although perhaps from a different point of view. He would, in fact, have liked immensely to be able to meet you …
The Judicial Council Act, Fowler V. Harper
The Judicial Council Act, Fowler V. Harper
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Punishment For Contempt Of Court, Hugh Evander Willis
Punishment For Contempt Of Court, Hugh Evander Willis
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Re-Arranging The Indiana Judiciary (Continued), Theophilus J. Moll
Re-Arranging The Indiana Judiciary (Continued), Theophilus J. Moll
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
The Present World Court Situation, Thomas J. Walsh
The Present World Court Situation, Thomas J. Walsh
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Some Conflicting Decisions Of The United States Supreme Court, Hugh Evander Willis
Some Conflicting Decisions Of The United States Supreme Court, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Re-Arranging The Indiana Judiciary, Theophilus J. Moll
Re-Arranging The Indiana Judiciary, Theophilus J. Moll
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State
Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State
Michigan Law Review
An interesting recent decision in Minnesota, Schendel v. C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co., raises two important questions concerning the effect to be given in one state of the Union to a judgment rendered in the courts of another. An action was brought in Minnesota by a special administrator, there appointed, to recover damages for the death of his decedent. The accident resulting in death had occurred in Iowa while the decedent, it was claimed, was engaged in inter-state commerce, so as to bring the claim within the federal statute. To this Minnesota action the defendant set up …
The New Annotated Federal Judicial Code, By James Love Hopkins; The New Federal Equity Rules, By James Love Hopkins, Robert C. Brown
The New Annotated Federal Judicial Code, By James Love Hopkins; The New Federal Equity Rules, By James Love Hopkins, Robert C. Brown
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
Work Of The Board Of Pardons In Indiana, John C. Chaney
Work Of The Board Of Pardons In Indiana, John C. Chaney
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Ruling On Demurrer To Petition For Annulment Of Marriage, Theophilus J. Moll
Ruling On Demurrer To Petition For Annulment Of Marriage, Theophilus J. Moll
Indiana Law Journal
This is a ruling on demurrer by Judge Moll in In Re Marriage of Henry R. Steinkuhler and Elizabeth P. Bowman, Superior CT. No. 35298. It gives a judicial pronouncement in a most unusual legal action
Does "Legislative Review" By Courts In Appeals From Public Utility Commissions Constitute Due Process Of Law?, Maurice H. Merrill
Does "Legislative Review" By Courts In Appeals From Public Utility Commissions Constitute Due Process Of Law?, Maurice H. Merrill
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
The Rule-Making Power Of The Courts, Charles H. Paul
Washington Law Review
With regard to the constitutionality of the proposal, the first question that occurs to every lawyer is whether the legislature may delegate the rule-making power to the courts. It seems strange that, in view of the history of English and American procedural law, this question should occur to anyone as presenting a serious objection, but the reason is, of course, that we have got so far away from the original method of regulating court procedure that our inclination is to believe that legislative codes are the only way in which court procedure can be prescribed. As a matter of fact, …
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
The Court Of Claims, J. H. Toelle
The Court Of Claims, J. H. Toelle
Michigan Law Review
The Court of Claims was established by Act of Congress in 1855. The original Act provided that at the commencement of each session of Congress, and at the commencement of each month during the session, the Court should report the cases upon which they should have finally acted, stating in each the material facts which they found established by the evidence, with their opinion in the case, and the. reasons upon which such opinion was founded, and the opinion of any judge who should dissent from the majority. It also directed the Court to prepare a bill or bills in …
Practice In Justice's Court Joining Or Splitting Causes Of Action, G. D. H.
Practice In Justice's Court Joining Or Splitting Causes Of Action, G. D. H.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Notes (And Indiana Docket)
The Uniformity Of The Maritime Law, George L. Canfield
The Uniformity Of The Maritime Law, George L. Canfield
Michigan Law Review
In 1871, Richard Henry Dana commenced a masterly article on the "History of Admiralty Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States,'' by writing, "After seventy yea.rs of baffling winds and cross currents in the region of admiralty jurisdiction, the Supreme Court of the United States has sailed out into deep water." In 1924, Charles Merrill Hough concludes his delightful "Admiralty Jurisdiction-of Late Years," with the statement, "The years since 1906 have not increased the certainty of maritime law, and they have impaired the tradition of enforceable customs of the sea." And others writing in current legal periodicals have …
The Technique Of Judicial Appointment, Harold J. Laski
The Technique Of Judicial Appointment, Harold J. Laski
Michigan Law Review
It is difficult to overestimate the significance of the judiciary in the modern state. The work of the executive has become so vast, the powers delegated to it by the legislature are so wide, that judges are, perhaps more than at any previous time, the real safeguard of personal liberty. It is only necessary to recall cases like Coppage v. Kansas, or R. v. Halliday, to realize how nearly judicial activity goes to the very heart of freedom. That is, of course, even more the case when, as with America, the constitution of the state is written, and …
The Validity Of The Act Of 1925 Calling A Constitutional Convention In Tennessee, O. T. Tindell
The Validity Of The Act Of 1925 Calling A Constitutional Convention In Tennessee, O. T. Tindell
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.