Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Scholarly Publishing
Who’S Talking About (And Citing) Me? Tracking Your Work Using Databases, Google, Web Of Knowledge, And Altmetrics Tools, Amanda Izenstark, Julia Lovett, Andrée Rathemacher
Who’S Talking About (And Citing) Me? Tracking Your Work Using Databases, Google, Web Of Knowledge, And Altmetrics Tools, Amanda Izenstark, Julia Lovett, Andrée Rathemacher
Julia Lovett
Open Access Week 2015 Poster #1, Richard James
Open Access Week 2015 Poster #2, Richard James
Characteristics Of A Megajournal: A Bibliometric Case Study, C. Sean Burns
Characteristics Of A Megajournal: A Bibliometric Case Study, C. Sean Burns
Information Science Faculty Publications
The term megajournal is used to describe publication platforms, like PLOS ONE, that claim to incorporate peer review processes and web technologies that allow fast review and publishing. These platforms also publish without the constraints of periodic issues and instead publish daily. We conducted a yearlong bibliometric profile of a sample of articles published in the first several months after the launch of PeerJ, a peer reviewed, open access publishing platform in the medical and biological sciences. The profile included a study of author characteristics, peer review characteristics, usage and social metrics, and a citation analysis. We found …
Found In Translation: Communicating The Value & Impact Of Library Publishing--Finding Stories, Matt Ruen
Found In Translation: Communicating The Value & Impact Of Library Publishing--Finding Stories, Matt Ruen
Matt Ruen
Faculty Perceptions Of Open Access Author Fees, Anne E. Rauh
Faculty Perceptions Of Open Access Author Fees, Anne E. Rauh
Anne Rauh
In fall 2013, librarians at Syracuse University and Cornell University surveyed STEM faculty to learn about their experiences with, and perceptions of, open access publishing and the author fees that may accompany that model. The results showed little experience with open access author fees but strong opinions about the open access model. This poster will highlight the cautious optimism found in the results along with suggestions for librarians to further faculty understanding of and participation in open access publishing.