Scholarly Publishing Commons^™

Blobaum’S Checklist For Review Of Journal Quality For Submission Of Scholarly Manuscripts, Paul M. Blobaum

Faculty Research and Creative Activity

This checklist gives authors a list of quality indicators to assist in the evaluation of journal quality when considering what journal to submit a manuscript to. None of these indicators establish credibility and legitimacy alone, but together may build a body of evidence that will support evaluative judgments. Pay-to-publish models, and charges to publish articles in open-access format have been adopted by legitimate and reputable publishers over time, but the solicitation of manuscripts by new publishers, especially those opaque policies and promising a fast turn around and publication time, and promising peer review have proliferated, and many of these publication …

Tricked Into Submission: Health Science Librarian's Role In Fighting Predatory Publishing And Spamferences, Paul M. Blobaum

Faculty Research and Creative Activity

Objectives

This paper explores the phenomena of predatory publishing, pseudo-scientific conferences, and vanity press publishers. Should these publications and conference presentations count towards tenure decisions? Are faculty tenure and promotion committees also being fooled? This paper explores the librarian role as gatekeeper, curator, and broker of knowledge. What are the characteristics and danger signs of low quality and predatory publishers? How can librarians promote and support publishing with reputable publishers and help improve manuscript quality?

Methods

The Author recently served as the chair of the University Personnel Committee, the tenure and promotion committee at Governors State University, a public university …