Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- #KRKTR (1)
- ASL (1)
- Accessibility (1)
- Action learning (1)
- Action research (1)
-
- Agency (1)
- Allies (1)
- American Sign Language (1)
- Anthropology (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Apache (1)
- Appreciative inquiry (1)
- Art (1)
- Asylum (1)
- Backward chaining (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Chronotope (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Collective intelligence (1)
- Communication (1)
- Community interpreting (1)
- Community of practice (1)
- Competition law (1)
- Conference interpreting (1)
- Conflict (1)
- Consciousness (1)
- Constitutive (1)
- Context (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Industrial Organization
Interpreting, Stephanie Jo Kent
Interpreting, Stephanie Jo Kent
Doctoral Dissertations
What do community interpreting for the Deaf in western societies, conference interpreting for the European Parliament, and language brokering in international management have in common? Academic research and professional training have historically emphasized the linguistic and cognitive challenges of interpreting, neglecting or ignoring the social aspects that structure communication. All forms of interpreting are inherently social; they involve relationships among at least three people and two languages. The contexts explored here, American Sign Language/English interpreting and spoken language interpreting within the European Parliament, show that simultaneous interpreting involves attitudes, norms and values about intercultural communication that overemphasize information and discount …
New Powers- New Vulnerabilities? A Critical Analysis Of Market Inquiries Performed By Competition Authorities, Tamar Indig, Michal Gal
New Powers- New Vulnerabilities? A Critical Analysis Of Market Inquiries Performed By Competition Authorities, Tamar Indig, Michal Gal
Michal Gal
In the past two decades the number of jurisdictions which have empowered their Competition Authorities to engage in market inquiries (MIs) has grown substantially. Although jurisdictions differ in the scope and procedure adopted for such studies, they all share an important common trait: attempting to allocate the roots of limited competition in the studied market. Market studies differ from traditional competition law tools in their triggers, range, object, and the level of pro-activity of the Competition Authority. They are not triggered by a suspicion of anti-competitive conduct of specific firm(s), but rather allow the Authority to use a broad prism …