Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Arbitrage (1)
- Competition law & policy (1)
- Consumer welfare standard (1)
- Corporate finance (1)
- Deals (1)
-
- Debt (1)
- Economic theory (1)
- Equity (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Law & economics (1)
- Law and financial economics (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legal practice and education (1)
- Leverage (1)
- Market power (1)
- Modigiliani-Miller (1)
- Movement antitrust (1)
- Reverse M&MI (1)
- Sherman Antitrust Act (1)
- Transactions (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Economic Theory
Hipster Antitrust: New Bottles, Same Old W(H)Ine?, Christopher S. Yoo
Hipster Antitrust: New Bottles, Same Old W(H)Ine?, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Although the debate over hipster antitrust is often portrayed as something new, experienced observers recognize it as a replay of an old argument that was resolved by the global consensus that antitrust should focus on consumer welfare rather than on the size of firms, the levels of industry concentration, and other considerations. Moreover, the history of the Federal Trade Commission’s Section 5 authority to prevent unfair methods of competition stands as a reminder of the dangers of allowing enforcement policy to be guided by vague and uncertain standards.
The Modigliani-Miller Theorem At 60: The Long-Overlooked Legal Applications Of Finance’S Foundational Theorem, Michael S. Knoll
The Modigliani-Miller Theorem At 60: The Long-Overlooked Legal Applications Of Finance’S Foundational Theorem, Michael S. Knoll
All Faculty Scholarship
2018 marks the 60th anniversary of the publication of Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller’s The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment. Widely hailed as the foundation of modern finance, their article, which purports to demonstrate that a firm’s value is independent of its capital structure, is little known by lawyers, including legal academics. That is unfortunate because the Modigliani-Miller capital structure irrelevancy proposition (when inverted) provides a framework that can be extremely useful to legal academics, practicing attorneys and judges.