Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Statistical Methodology Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Statistical Methodology

Constructing A Confidence Interval For The Fraction Who Benefit From Treatment, Using Randomized Trial Data, Emily J. Huang, Ethan X. Fang, Daniel F. Hanley, Michael Rosenblum Oct 2017

Constructing A Confidence Interval For The Fraction Who Benefit From Treatment, Using Randomized Trial Data, Emily J. Huang, Ethan X. Fang, Daniel F. Hanley, Michael Rosenblum

Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers

The fraction who benefit from treatment is the proportion of patients whose potential outcome under treatment is better than that under control. Inference on this parameter is challenging since it is only partially identifiable, even in our context of a randomized trial. We propose a new method for constructing a confidence interval for the fraction, when the outcome is ordinal or binary. Our confidence interval procedure is pointwise consistent. It does not require any assumptions about the joint distribution of the potential outcomes, although it has the flexibility to incorporate various user-defined assumptions. Unlike existing confidence interval methods for partially …


Comparison Of Adaptive Randomized Trial Designs For Time-To-Event Outcomes That Expand Versus Restrict Enrollment Criteria, To Test Non-Inferiority, Josh Betz, Jon Arni Steingrimsson, Tianchen Qian, Michael Rosenblum Sep 2017

Comparison Of Adaptive Randomized Trial Designs For Time-To-Event Outcomes That Expand Versus Restrict Enrollment Criteria, To Test Non-Inferiority, Josh Betz, Jon Arni Steingrimsson, Tianchen Qian, Michael Rosenblum

Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers

Adaptive enrichment designs involve preplanned rules for modifying patient enrollment criteria based on data accrued in an ongoing trial. These designs may be useful when it is suspected that a subpopulation, e.g., defined by a biomarker or risk score measured at baseline, may benefit more from treatment than the complementary subpopulation. We compare two types of such designs, for the case of two subpopulations that partition the overall population. The first type starts by enrolling the subpopulation where it is suspected the new treatment is most likely to work, and then may expand inclusion criteria if there is early evidence …


Estimating Autoantibody Signatures To Detect Autoimmune Disease Patient Subsets, Zhenke Wu, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Ami A. Shah, Antony Rosen, Scott L. Zeger Apr 2017

Estimating Autoantibody Signatures To Detect Autoimmune Disease Patient Subsets, Zhenke Wu, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Ami A. Shah, Antony Rosen, Scott L. Zeger

Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by highly specific immune responses against molecules in self-tissues. Different autoimmune diseases are characterized by distinct immune responses, making autoantibodies useful for diagnosis and prediction. In many diseases, the targets of autoantibodies are incompletely defined. Although the technologies for autoantibody discovery have advanced dramatically over the past decade, each of these techniques generates hundreds of possibilities, which are onerous and expensive to validate. We set out to establish a method to greatly simplify autoantibody discovery, using a pre-filtering step to define subgroups with similar specificities based on migration of labeled, immunoprecipitated proteins on sodium dodecyl sulfate …


It's All About Balance: Propensity Score Matching In The Context Of Complex Survey Data, David Lenis, Trang Q. ;Nguyen, Nian Dong, Elizabeth A. Stuart Feb 2017

It's All About Balance: Propensity Score Matching In The Context Of Complex Survey Data, David Lenis, Trang Q. ;Nguyen, Nian Dong, Elizabeth A. Stuart

Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers

Many research studies aim to draw causal inferences using data from large, nationally representative survey samples, and many of these studies use propensity score matching to make those causal inferences as rigorous as possible given the non-experimental nature of the data. However, very few applied studies are careful about incorporating the survey design with the propensity score analysis, which may mean that the results don’t generate population inferences. This may be because few methodological studies examine how to best combine these methods. Furthermore, even fewer of the methodological studies incorporate different non-response mechanisms in their analysis. This study examines methods …