Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Breast Cancer Awareness Month (1)
- Clinical trials (1)
- Financial toxicity (1)
- Health care disparities (1)
- Hysterectomy (1)
-
- Joint replacement (1)
- Male breast cancer (1)
- Metastatic breast cancer (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- PROMs (1)
- Patient expectations (1)
- Patient-centered care (1)
- Patient-reported outcomes (1)
- Perception (1)
- Regret (1)
- Shared decision-making (1)
- Spinal fusion (1)
- Surgery (1)
- Surgery outcomes (1)
- Surgical counseling (1)
- Surgical decision-making (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Health Services Research
Action Items For Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Deanna J. Attai
Action Items For Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Deanna J. Attai
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
This special issue introduction provides a brief history of Breast Cancer Awareness Month and focuses on patient populations often omitted from annual marketing campaigns. The importance of research is emphasized as a means to improve the outcomes of people with metastatic breast cancer and male breast cancer as well as to address health care inequities related to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.
A Prospective Study Of Patterns Of Regret In The Year After Hysterectomy, Roopina Sangha, Andrew Bossick, Wan-Ting K. Su, Chad Coleman, Neha Chavali, Ganesa Wegienka
A Prospective Study Of Patterns Of Regret In The Year After Hysterectomy, Roopina Sangha, Andrew Bossick, Wan-Ting K. Su, Chad Coleman, Neha Chavali, Ganesa Wegienka
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Purpose: This study sought to identify patterns of self-reported regret after hysterectomy.
Methods: Women undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication were recruited in the 2 weeks prior to surgery. Women reported demographics and completed validated questionnaires (Decisional Regret Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity) up to 7 times over the first year postsurgery. Medical records were reviewed for clinical and operative details. Latent class growth mixture models were applied to the repeated regret scores to identify patterns after hysterectomy. Clinical and other participant characteristics were compared across the classes.
Results: Three latent …
What Outcomes Matter To Patients After Joint Or Spine Surgery?, Robin R. Whitebird, Leif I. Solberg, Christine K. Norton, Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Stephen E. Asche, Elizabeth S. Grossman
What Outcomes Matter To Patients After Joint Or Spine Surgery?, Robin R. Whitebird, Leif I. Solberg, Christine K. Norton, Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Stephen E. Asche, Elizabeth S. Grossman
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical care, but there have been few studies of what patients identify as the most important outcomes.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 65 patients undergoing hip or knee replacement, spinal discectomy/laminotomy, or a spinal fusion. Interviews focused on outcomes patients identified as important, perceived usefulness of standardized PROMs measures, and contextual situations important to their care. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach.
Results: Patients identified desired outcomes that were unique and important to them. Their preferred outcomes focused in the areas of freedom from pain, getting back …
Surgeons’ Views On Shared Decision-Making, Suraj Kannan, Jayhyun Seo, Kevin R. Riggs, Gail Geller, Emily F. Boss, Zackary D. Berger
Surgeons’ Views On Shared Decision-Making, Suraj Kannan, Jayhyun Seo, Kevin R. Riggs, Gail Geller, Emily F. Boss, Zackary D. Berger
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Purpose: Shared decision-making (SDM) has a significant role in surgical encounters, where decisions are influenced by both clinician and patient preferences. Herein, we sought to explore surgeons’ practices and beliefs about SDM.
Methods: We performed a qualitative study consisting of semi-structured individual interviews with 18 surgeons from private practice and academic surgery practices in Baltimore, Maryland. We purposively sampled participants to maximize diversity of practice type (academic vs private), surgical specialty, gender, and experience level. Interview topics included benefits and challenges to patient involvement in decision-making, communicating uncertainty to patients, and use of decision aids. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. …