Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Water Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Natural Resources Law

PDF

Journal

2004

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Water Law

In Memoriam - John P. Taylor, Natural Resources Journal Oct 2004

In Memoriam - John P. Taylor, Natural Resources Journal

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

National Wildlife Refuge System: Ecological Context And Ingegrity, J. Michael Scott, Thomas Loveland, Kevin Gergely, James Strittholt, Nancy Staus Oct 2004

National Wildlife Refuge System: Ecological Context And Ingegrity, J. Michael Scott, Thomas Loveland, Kevin Gergely, James Strittholt, Nancy Staus

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Swancc: Full Of Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing … Much?, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1017 (2004), Jeremy A. Colby Jan 2004

Swancc: Full Of Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing … Much?, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1017 (2004), Jeremy A. Colby

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Tribal Authority Under The Clean Air Act: How Is It Working?, Jana B. Milford Jan 2004

Tribal Authority Under The Clean Air Act: How Is It Working?, Jana B. Milford

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Recent Books On John Wesley Powell, Denise D. Fort Jan 2004

Recent Books On John Wesley Powell, Denise D. Fort

Natural Resources Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

State V. Colosimo: Minnesota Anglers’ Freedom From Unreasonable Searches And Seizures Becomes “The One That Got Away”, Edwin J. Butterfoss, Joseph L. Daly Jan 2004

State V. Colosimo: Minnesota Anglers’ Freedom From Unreasonable Searches And Seizures Becomes “The One That Got Away”, Edwin J. Butterfoss, Joseph L. Daly

William Mitchell Law Review

This article examines the various opinions in the Colosimo case, including the opinion of the Minnesota Court of Appeals (which was reversed by the supreme court), as well as the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions of the supreme court. The article provides a brief background of how the issue of stops and inspections by conservation officers has been dealt with in other jurisdictions before turning to a critique of the Minnesota Supreme Court's decision in Colosimo, which the authors consider far too expansive. The decision in Colosimo undermines the right of citizens of Minnesota to be free from invasions of …

Go to article