Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (2745)
- Courts (1740)
- Judges (1246)
- State and Local Government Law (1103)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (858)
-
- Jurisprudence (846)
- Criminal Procedure (805)
- Legal History (779)
- First Amendment (739)
- Legislation (702)
- Criminal Law (696)
- Law and Politics (621)
- Fourteenth Amendment (530)
- Civil Procedure (463)
- Administrative Law (462)
- Law and Race (453)
- Law and Society (430)
- Health Law and Policy (355)
- Civil Law (352)
- Labor and Employment Law (351)
- Fourth Amendment (349)
- Jurisdiction (345)
- Religion Law (344)
- Human Rights Law (336)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (335)
- Litigation (327)
- Business Organizations Law (326)
- International Law (322)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1584)
- William & Mary Law School (608)
- University of Richmond (432)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (292)
- University of Colorado Law School (277)
-
- Selected Works (245)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (155)
- Seattle University School of Law (131)
- St. John's University School of Law (122)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Notre Dame Law School (106)
- Cleveland State University (105)
- University of Georgia School of Law (103)
- New York Law School (102)
- UIC School of Law (96)
- Columbia Law School (95)
- Roger Williams University (95)
- Boston University School of Law (87)
- Emory University School of Law (85)
- The University of Akron (84)
- Brooklyn Law School (81)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (78)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (72)
- Duke Law (71)
- Fordham Law School (70)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (67)
- Georgetown University Law Center (57)
- University of Miami Law School (54)
- American University Washington College of Law (53)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (53)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (1622)
- Supreme Court (874)
- Constitution (374)
- Constitutional law (240)
- First Amendment (192)
-
- Congress (190)
- Discrimination (171)
- Federalism (167)
- Judicial review (154)
- Due process (148)
- SCOTUS (139)
- Federal (135)
- Police (130)
- Fifth Amendment (127)
- Supreme Court of the United States (125)
- History (121)
- State (116)
- Sixth Amendment (111)
- Race and law (110)
- Abortion (104)
- Equal Protection Clause (104)
- Equal protection (101)
- Jurisprudence (101)
- Constitutional Law (98)
- Supreme court (96)
- New York (93)
- Statutory interpretation (91)
- Law reform (90)
- Fourth Amendment (85)
- Affirmative action (83)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (824)
- Articles (474)
- University of Richmond Law Review (390)
- Supreme Court Preview (281)
- Faculty Scholarship (277)
-
- Touro Law Review (268)
- Publications (262)
- Faculty Publications (210)
- All Faculty Scholarship (157)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Seattle University Law Review (121)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (113)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (95)
- Faculty Articles (88)
- Akron Law Review (81)
- William & Mary Law Review (80)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (65)
- UIC Law Review (65)
- Scholarly Articles (64)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (60)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (54)
- Neal E. Devins (53)
- Notre Dame Law Review (49)
- Indiana Law Journal (48)
- Popular Media (48)
- Scholarly Works (48)
- Book Chapters (46)
- Cleveland State Law Review (46)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (44)
- Georgia Law Review (44)
- Publication Type
Articles 5731 - 5760 of 7007
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Review Of Cardozo: A Study In Reputation, By R. Posner, Richard D. Friedman
Review Of Cardozo: A Study In Reputation, By R. Posner, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
Judge Richard Posner has written a genial book about one of our greatest judicial icons, Benjamin N. Cardozo.1 He seeks not only to assess the merits of Cardozo's writings, both on and off the bench, but also to measure, and determine the causes of, Cardozo's reputation. The book is an outgrowth of a lecture series,2 and it reveals its origins in at least two ways. First, the book attempts to reach a mixed audience, composed of both lawyers and laypeople, and in this aspect it is very successful. Nonlawyers, I believe, will have little difficulty following Judge Posner's essential arguments, …
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abortion Rights, Eileen Kaufman
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Compounding Confusion And Hampering Diversity: Life After Finley And The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Richard D. Freer
Compounding Confusion And Hampering Diversity: Life After Finley And The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Richard D. Freer
Faculty Articles
It has been a tough couple of years for supplemental jurisdiction. In recent decades, the doctrine, which earlier had been called the "child of necessity and sire of confusion," had become somewhat less confusing. The Supreme Court created a flurry of concern over the future of the doctrine with a pair of restrictive decisions in the late 1970s, but showed no further interest; the lower courts generally interpreted those holdings narrowly. With exceptions in a couple of areas, the application of supplemental jurisdiction in the various joinder situations became relatively clear and predictable, and the doctrine played a major role …
Waiver Of Rights In The Interrogation Room: The Court's Dilemma, William T. Pizzi
Waiver Of Rights In The Interrogation Room: The Court's Dilemma, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Prisoners' Rights, Timothy Zick
Structural Free Exercise, Mary Ann Glendon, Raul F. Yanes
Structural Free Exercise, Mary Ann Glendon, Raul F. Yanes
Michigan Law Review
In Part I of this article, we analyze the development of case law interpreting the religious freedom language of the First Amendment from the 1940s to the eve of the rights revolution as a casualty of the piecemeal approach to incorporation, compounded by a series of judicial lapses and oversights. Part II deals with the fate of the Religion Clause in the era of the rights revolution, when the free exercise and establishment provisions were deployed in the service of a constitutional agenda to which they were, in themselves, largely peripheral. The current period of doctrinal change is the subject …
Putting The Dormancy Doctrine Out Of Its Misery, Richard D. Friedman
Putting The Dormancy Doctrine Out Of Its Misery, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Justice Antonin Scalia has put on the academic table the question of whether the doctrine of the dormant commerce clause should be abandoned. That is a significant contribution, for this is an issue that should be debated thoroughly. But Justice Scalia's campaign against the doctrine has been notably ambivalent. On the one hand, he argues that the doctrine lacks justification in constitutional text, history, and theory.1 On the other hand, assertedly feeling the pressure of stare decisis,2 he has gone along with, and even led, applications of the doctrine, although within narrow limits.3 In this essay, I argue that Justice …
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Model For How A Classic Conservative Court Would Enforce The Bill Of Rights, Nadine Strossen
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Model For How A Classic Conservative Court Would Enforce The Bill Of Rights, Nadine Strossen
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The New York Law School Centennial Conference In Honor Of Justice John Marshall Harlan, James F. Simon
Foreword: The New York Law School Centennial Conference In Honor Of Justice John Marshall Harlan, James F. Simon
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Grasping At Burnt Straws: The Disaster Of The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Thomas C. Arthur, Richard Freer
Grasping At Burnt Straws: The Disaster Of The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Thomas C. Arthur, Richard Freer
Faculty Articles
Ah, the strawman model! Where would Professors Rowe, Burbank, and Mengler be without it? At a minimum, they would have a much shorter article. If Professor Freer in fact torched the entire farm, it is because there was so much dry straw lying around after the three drafters finished tilting with the strawmen they created in their response to Professor Freer's article. The drafters spend more than half of their article arguing the irrelevant points that a statute was needed after Finley, that the statute was consistent with recommendations of the Federal Courts Study Committee, and that Professor Freer …
Ex Proprio Vigore, James J. White
Ex Proprio Vigore, James J. White
Articles
The National Conference of the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) is a legislature in every way but one. It drafts uniform acts, debates them, passes them, and promulgates them, but that passage and promulgation do not make these uniform acts law over any citizen of any state. These acts become the law of the various states only ex proprio vigore - only if their own vitality influences the legislators of the various states to pass them.
Absolute Priority And New Value, James J. White
Absolute Priority And New Value, James J. White
Articles
This paper is based on a lecture given on December 6, 1990 ast the Second Annual Robert E. Krinock Lecture. The absolute priority rule is a specific application of the broader doctrine that reorganization plans must be "fair and equitable." Both have their origins in the railroad reorganization cases of the early 20th century. The general doctrine is now codified in section 1129(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code and the rule is codified in subsection 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) which provides that the debtor must pay a nonconsenting class of unsecured creditors in full or "the holder of any claim or interest that is …
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
Professor Elliott raises two questions about the American Psychological Association's practice of submitting amicus briefs to the courts. First, are our data sufficiently valid, consistent, and generalizable to be applicable to the real world issues? Second, are amicus briefs adequate to communicate scientific findings? The first of these is not a general question, but must be addressed anew each time the Association considers a new issue. An evaluation of the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about racial discrimination, for example, tells us nothing at all about the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about sexual abuse. "Are the data …