Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (34)
- Courts (15)
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Judges (11)
- Legislation (11)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Labor and Employment Law (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- State and Local Government Law (9)
- Legal History (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Criminal Law (7)
- First Amendment (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Civil Procedure (6)
- Privacy Law (6)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (4)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- Commercial Law (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Legal Biography (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Torts (3)
- Communications Law (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Retirees: Assessing The Propriety Of Post-Retirement Activities, 54 Uic L. Rev. 829 (2021), Christopher Smith
Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Retirees: Assessing The Propriety Of Post-Retirement Activities, 54 Uic L. Rev. 829 (2021), Christopher Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Anthony Kennedy As Senior Associate Justice: Influence And Impact, 53 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 907 (2019), Charles Jacob, Christopher Smith
Justice Anthony Kennedy As Senior Associate Justice: Influence And Impact, 53 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 907 (2019), Charles Jacob, Christopher Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Navigating The Rubicon: Constitutionalism And The Inevitability Of The Social Contract, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2017), Lillian M. Spiess
Navigating The Rubicon: Constitutionalism And The Inevitability Of The Social Contract, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2017), Lillian M. Spiess
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Corporation In The Marketplace Of Ideas, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2017), Matthew Telleen
The Corporation In The Marketplace Of Ideas, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2017), Matthew Telleen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amici Curiae In The United States Supreme Court And The Australian High Court: A Lesson In Balancing Amicability, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (2017), Benjamin Robert Hopper
Amici Curiae In The United States Supreme Court And The Australian High Court: A Lesson In Balancing Amicability, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (2017), Benjamin Robert Hopper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implicit In The Concept Of Ordered Liberty: How Obergefell V. Hodges Illuminates The Modern Substantive Due Process Debate, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1021 (2016), Matthew Grothouse
Implicit In The Concept Of Ordered Liberty: How Obergefell V. Hodges Illuminates The Modern Substantive Due Process Debate, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1021 (2016), Matthew Grothouse
UIC Law Review
This Article uses the historical sweep of the Due Process Clause to evaluate the merits of Obergefell’s majority and dissenting opinions. Specifically, the Article explains why the Due Process Clause’s prohibition on arbitrary punishments in general—and legislative judgments in particular—invariably mandates the judicial nullification of arbitrary and irrational legislative acts. What exactly constitutes a “legislative judgment” and how much deference courts should exercise in examining legislative acts are the crucial and largely unanswered questions lying at the heart of the Obergefell case (and in substantive due process cases in general). Although the Obergefell Court’s discussion focuses on a single case, …
The Call And The Response: The Call, The 1991 Open Letter From Federal Judge A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., And The 25 Years Of Response From Justice Clarence Thomas, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 925 (2016), Angela Mae Kupenda
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Out Of Touch: Shelby V. Holder And The Callous Effects Of Chief Justice Roberts’S Equal State Sovereignty, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 751 (2016), Adam Bolotin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Clever Contraband: Why Illinois’ Lockstep With The U.S. Supreme Court Gives Police Authority To Search The Bowels Of Your Vehicle, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2013), Jason Cooper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court And The Department Of Labor May Dispel Myths About Erisa's Family Law Provisions And Protect The Benefit Entitlements That Arise Thereunder, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 635 (2012), Albert Feuer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Past, Present, And Future Of Supreme Court Jurisprudence On Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxv (2012), Colleen E. Medill
Foreword: The Past, Present, And Future Of Supreme Court Jurisprudence On Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxv (2012), Colleen E. Medill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Fills A Gaping Hole: Cigna Corp. V. Amara Clarifies The Scope Of Equitable Relief Under Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (2012), Susan Harthill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Order To Be Silent, You Must First Speak: The Supreme Court Extends Davis's Clarity Requirement To The Right To Remain Silent In Berghuis V. Thompkins, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 423 (2011), Harvey Gee
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dedication Of Issue To Chief Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxiii (2009), Editorial Board 2008-2009
Dedication Of Issue To Chief Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxiii (2009), Editorial Board 2008-2009
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Case Note: Golden Gate Restaurant Association V. City And County Of San Francisco: Setting The Stage For Supreme Court Review Of The Most Important Preemption Matter In The History Of Erisa, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2008), Joshua Waldbeser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Service Of Secrets: The U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Totten, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (2006), Douglas Kash, Matthew Indrisano
In The Service Of Secrets: The U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Totten, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (2006), Douglas Kash, Matthew Indrisano
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall In Historical Perspective, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall In Historical Perspective, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Third House Of Congress Versus The Fourth Branch Of Government: The Impact Of Congressional Committee Staff On Agency Regulatory Decision-Making, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 247 (1986), James P. Hill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Roberson: The Supreme Court Expands Suspects' Rights In The Custodial Interrogation Setting, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 685 (1989), Thomas N. Radek
Arizona V. Roberson: The Supreme Court Expands Suspects' Rights In The Custodial Interrogation Setting, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 685 (1989), Thomas N. Radek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carnegie-Mellon University V. Cohill: The United States Supreme Court Upholds The Authority Of Federal Courts To Remand Properly Removed Pendent Jurisdiction Claims, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 389 (1988), William Barrett
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. Transportation Agency: The United States Supreme Court Weighs Statistical Imbalance In Favor Of Affirmative Action, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 593 (1988), Denise C. Hockley-Cann
Johnson V. Transportation Agency: The United States Supreme Court Weighs Statistical Imbalance In Favor Of Affirmative Action, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 593 (1988), Denise C. Hockley-Cann
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privacy, Pornography, And The Supreme Court, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 755 (1988), Richard F. Hixson
Privacy, Pornography, And The Supreme Court, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 755 (1988), Richard F. Hixson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Johnson: The Supreme Court Extends The Feres Doctrine Bar To Ftca Recovery Against Non-Military Tortfeasors, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1988), Susan Beaupre Lindholm
United States V. Johnson: The Supreme Court Extends The Feres Doctrine Bar To Ftca Recovery Against Non-Military Tortfeasors, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1988), Susan Beaupre Lindholm
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
California Federal Savings & (And) Loan Association V. Guerra: Supreme Court Affirms California's Efforts To Accommodate Pregnancy In Fair Employment Laws, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 181 (1987), Judith Gallo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statutes Of Limitation And Section 1983: Implications For Illinois Civil Rights Law, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 415 (1987), Brian Kibble-Smith
Statutes Of Limitation And Section 1983: Implications For Illinois Civil Rights Law, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 415 (1987), Brian Kibble-Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.