Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
State and Local Government Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Courts (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Housing Law (2)
- Juvenile Law (2)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Torts (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in State and Local Government Law
A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones
A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones
Cleveland State Law Review
The recent expansion of the use of administrative agencies to facilitate the functioning of the various levels of governmental operations has created a correspondingly complex morass of procedural law. Administrative procedure being the creation of administrative law, a definition of the latter is necessary for an understanding of the former. This area of law has been demarcated by "the provisions of statutes conferring rule making and adjudicatory powers upon organizations in government outside the judicial branch and orders entered by these agencies pursuant to such powers."' It should be noted, however, that this definition, like other brief definitions of broad …
Sovereign Immunity Abrogated In Ohio: Krause V. State, James B. Wilkens
Sovereign Immunity Abrogated In Ohio: Krause V. State, James B. Wilkens
Cleveland State Law Review
The decision thus promulgates three principal rulings: (1) that sovereign immunity does not provide a bar to bringing an action against the State of Ohio, (2) that the state is liable by virtue of the doctrine of respondeat superior for the authorized activities of its officers, employees and other agents, and (3) that freedom of individual agents from civil liability arising out of authorized activities for the state is retained. The effects of these rulings are far from obvious, in large part because of the confused prior state of the law upon which they are engrafted. Furthermore, the grounds given …