Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (27)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
-
- University of Richmond (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Securities (18)
- Securities regulation (4)
- Tender offers (4)
- Actions and defenses (2)
- Blue sky law (2)
-
- Commodity trading (2)
- Investment contract (2)
- Securities Exchange Comm. (2)
- Securities fraud (2)
- Securities law (2)
- Standing to sue (2)
- Stock (2)
- 10B-5 (1)
- 517.211 (1)
- Accountants (1)
- Alanthus Corp. (1)
- Banks and banking (1)
- Book Review (1)
- Bronstein (1)
- Brown v. Rairigh (1)
- Chandler v. Kew (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Clearing of securities (1)
- Coffin (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Common enterprise (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Corporate Reorganization (1)
- Corporate acquisitions and mergers (1)
- Corporate borrowing (1)
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (2)
-
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Supreme Court Case Files (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (2)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scott T. FitzGibbon (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 50 of 50
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Tender Offers: Standing To Sue, Prohibited Practices, Reliance Of Non-Tenderer
Tender Offers: Standing To Sue, Prohibited Practices, Reliance Of Non-Tenderer
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implied Private Rights Of Action Under Section 17(A)
Implied Private Rights Of Action Under Section 17(A)
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standing To Sue Under The Williams Act
Standing To Sue Under The Williams Act
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Real Estate And Unconventional Securities Under The Arkansas Securities Act, Harvey L. Bell
Real Estate And Unconventional Securities Under The Arkansas Securities Act, Harvey L. Bell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Acquisition Of Businesses Through Purchase Of Corporate Stock: An Argument For Exclusion From Federal Securities Regulation, Christine L. Mcaneny
Acquisition Of Businesses Through Purchase Of Corporate Stock: An Argument For Exclusion From Federal Securities Regulation, Christine L. Mcaneny
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Sec And Corporate Disclosure: Regulation In Search Of A Purpose, Michigan Law Review
The Sec And Corporate Disclosure: Regulation In Search Of A Purpose, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Book Notice about The SEC and Corporate Disclosure: Regulation in Search of a Purpose by Homer Kripke
Panel I: A Fresh Look At Federal Regulatory Strategies, Roberta S. Karmel, Richard B. Smith
Panel I: A Fresh Look At Federal Regulatory Strategies, Roberta S. Karmel, Richard B. Smith
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Reflections On Convenience Translations: A Reply To Professor Brooks, William K.S. Wang
Reflections On Convenience Translations: A Reply To Professor Brooks, William K.S. Wang
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Le Chateau Royal Corp. V. Pantaleo, 370 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1979), William Dekle Dey
Le Chateau Royal Corp. V. Pantaleo, 370 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1979), William Dekle Dey
Florida State University Law Review
Securities Regulation-INVESTMENT CONTRACT-COMMON ENTERPRISE-MORE THAN A SINGLE INVESTOR IS REQUIRED FOR A CONTRACT TO BE AN INVESTMENT CONTRACT CONSTITUTING A SECURITY
Redemption Of Stock Under The Model Business Corporations Act And The Virginia Stock Corporation Act, Daniel T. Murphy
Redemption Of Stock Under The Model Business Corporations Act And The Virginia Stock Corporation Act, Daniel T. Murphy
Law Faculty Publications
The Model Business Corporation Act (hereinafter the "Model Act") has been in existence for more than twenty-five years, and has served as the paradigm for the revised corporation statutes of approximately twenty-five states, including Virginia. Despite its age, certain of its provisions have been infrequently applied and interpreted in judicial opinions. One such set of provisions is that dealing with a corporation's right to redeem shares of its stock. The purpose of this article is to analyze the Model Act's provisions regarding the redemption of shares; and to review, in contrast thereto, the relevant provisions of the Virginia stock corporation …
The Safe-Harbor Rule For Projections: Caveat Projector, Kristine M. Elmlund
The Safe-Harbor Rule For Projections: Caveat Projector, Kristine M. Elmlund
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Pennsylvania Takeover Disclosure Law: A Statute Waiting To Be Invalidated, Ira P. Tiger
The Pennsylvania Takeover Disclosure Law: A Statute Waiting To Be Invalidated, Ira P. Tiger
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Securities Law - Rule 10b-5 - Recklessness Formulation Of Scienter Requirement Under Rule 10b-5, Thomas G. Wilkinson Jr.
Securities Law - Rule 10b-5 - Recklessness Formulation Of Scienter Requirement Under Rule 10b-5, Thomas G. Wilkinson Jr.
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Special Study Of The Options Market: Its Findings And Recommendations, David A. Lipton
The Special Study Of The Options Market: Its Findings And Recommendations, David A. Lipton
Scholarly Articles
Since its inception in 1972, listed options trading has become a very important source of income for the securities industry. The total volume of transactions has risen dramatically, but so have investor complaints. The author of this article examines the 1979 study of the options markets issued by the SEC staff, notes its principal recommendations, and discusses the need for greater industry self-regulation. The author notes that the SEC is still considering final rule proposals in the options field, and he suggests that the options/securities industry will probably be altered in the following respects: (1) a restructuring of the existing …
Expansion Of The Williams Act: Tender Offer Regulation For Non-Conventional Purchases, Henry R. Daar
Expansion Of The Williams Act: Tender Offer Regulation For Non-Conventional Purchases, Henry R. Daar
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Continental Grain (Australia) Pty. Ltd. V.Pacific Oilseeds, Inc.: An Unjustifiable Expansion Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction In A Transnational Securities Fraud Case, Joseph A. Marovitch
Continental Grain (Australia) Pty. Ltd. V.Pacific Oilseeds, Inc.: An Unjustifiable Expansion Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction In A Transnational Securities Fraud Case, Joseph A. Marovitch
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
This note will suggest that the holding in Continental Grain repre- sents an unjustifiably expansive application of the conduct test. Recog- nizing the Second Circuit's expertise in the securities law area, this note will critically examine the case of that circuit, concluding that the Sec- ond Circuit would not have found jurisdiction under the conduct test on the facts of Continental Grain.' Next, SEC v. Kasser,8 a Third Cir- cuit case relied upon by the court in Continental Grain, will be criticized as an unwarranted expansion of the conduct test. Unwarranted or not, Kasser also could have been distinguished on …
Comment, Rationalizing Liability For Nondisclosure Under 10b-5: Equal Access To Information And United States V. Chiarella,, Juliet P. Kostritsky
Comment, Rationalizing Liability For Nondisclosure Under 10b-5: Equal Access To Information And United States V. Chiarella,, Juliet P. Kostritsky
Faculty Publications
Chiarella provided the Second Circuit with an opportunity to resolve an important issue on which there previously had been no square holding: whether a person who is not an insider and has no inside knowledge about the company whose securities he is trading nevertheless has a duty to disclose nonpublic material information in his possession about impending stock market events. The court viewed such a person as a "market insider"'" and found a duty to disclose. To evaluate the propriety of imposing liability in this situation, this comment will first trace the development and expansion of liability for nondisclosure under …
The Effect Of The New Sec Rules On The Constitutionality Of State Takeover Statutes, Kathleen E. Slusser
The Effect Of The New Sec Rules On The Constitutionality Of State Takeover Statutes, Kathleen E. Slusser
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note examines the constitutionality of state takeover statutes in light of the SEC's 1979 adoption of new merger rules governing tender offers. It discusses the procedural and substantive requirements of both the Williams Act and the new SEC rules, the state takeover statutes, and the preemption question that is raised by the combination of these laws. The author then argues that state takeover statutes are unconstitutional by virtue of their conflict with specific provisions of the new SEC rules.
What Is A Security? -- A Redefinition Based On Eligibility To Participate In The Financial Markets, Scott T. Fitzgibbon
What Is A Security? -- A Redefinition Based On Eligibility To Participate In The Financial Markets, Scott T. Fitzgibbon
Scott T. FitzGibbon
No abstract provided.