Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Military, War, and Peace Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Cleveland State University

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 34 of 34

Full-Text Articles in Military, War, and Peace

Book Review, Norman E. Mcintyre Jan 1958

Book Review, Norman E. Mcintyre

Cleveland State Law Review

Reviewing Alfred Avins, The Law of AWOL, Oceana Publications, 1957


Federal Civil Jurisdiction Of Military Justice, Chester B. Gynn Jr. Jan 1957

Federal Civil Jurisdiction Of Military Justice, Chester B. Gynn Jr.

Cleveland State Law Review

Control exercised by the federal civil courts over courts-martial differs from that found in other types of cases involving the relation of federal and state courts. The federal civil courts are constitutional courts; the military courts are administrative courts established by Congress and empowered by the Constitution; while state courts receive their power from entirely different sovereigns. Thus, to determine the powers of review which federal civil courts have over courts-martial, reference must be made almost exclusively to cases involving courts-martial.


The Suppression Of Dissent In Wartime - England 1792-1795, Harry M. Broder Jan 1954

The Suppression Of Dissent In Wartime - England 1792-1795, Harry M. Broder

Cleveland State Law Review

As we search today for an effective solution of the problem of preserving our basic freedoms from internal and external enemies, it seems particularly appropriate to consider a some-what analogous situation in history. From 1789 to 1795, English opinion changed from widespread approval of the French Revolution and its aims to a hatred and fear that included all persons and ideas which advocated any departure from the status quo in England itself. As late as 1792, the possibility of war seemed so remote the the Army estimates were reduced. One year later, France and England were at war, and the …


An International Bill Of Rights For Prisoners Of War, John Mcginness Jan 1953

An International Bill Of Rights For Prisoners Of War, John Mcginness

Cleveland State Law Review

On August 12, 1949 plenipotentiaries of sixty-one nations of the world, including the United States and the Soviets, concluded a Convention at Geneva which revised the Geneva Convention of July 27, 1929 relative to the treatment of prisoners of war. Many of these revisions are based upon the experiences of World War II. Although neither the United States nor the Soviets have ratified this Convention, the United States Forces in Korea have been, and are, under instructions to observe their provisions at all times. This Convention appears to be a positive step forward in the clarification of international law as …