Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (24)
- Law and Society (12)
- Courts (7)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
-
- Family Law (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Social Welfare Law (4)
- Torts (4)
- Economics (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Legal Writing and Research (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Law and Medicine (8)
- Medical Jurisprudence (7)
- Abortion (4)
- Law and Society (4)
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Fetus (3)
- Health law (3)
- Personhood (3)
- Bioethics (2)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Courts (2)
- Doctor-patient relationship (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Life-prolonging medical treatment (2)
- Medical costs (2)
- Medical law and procedure (2)
- Medical malpractice (2)
- Patient competency (2)
- Right to die (2)
- Roe v. Wade (2)
- Saikewicz decision (2)
- Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (2)
- Terminal illness (2)
- Torts (2)
- "sorry" laws (1)
- ALI (1)
- Abject (1)
- Abortion--Government policy (1)
- Abortion--Law and legislation (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
Medical Paternalism And The Rule Of Law: A Reply To Dr. Relman, Charles Baron
Medical Paternalism And The Rule Of Law: A Reply To Dr. Relman, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
In this Article, Professor Baron challenges the position taken recently by Dr. Arnold Relman in this journal that the 1977 Saikewicz decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts was incorrect in calling for routine judicial resolution of decisions whether to provide life-prolonging treatment to terminally ill incompetent patients. First, Professor Baron argues that Dr. Relman's position that doctors should make such decisions is based upon an outmoded, paternalistic view of the doctor-patient relationship. Second, he points out the importance of guaranteeing to such decisions the special qualities of process which characterize decision making by courts and which are not …