Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Courts (12)
- Criminal Law (12)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Law and Society (11)
-
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (9)
- Judges (9)
- Law and Economics (9)
- Economics (8)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Commercial Law (6)
- Conflict of Laws (6)
- Environmental Law (6)
- Evidence (6)
- International Law (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Torts (6)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Civil Law (5)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Courts (12)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (11)
- Law and Society (11)
- General Law (10)
-
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Dispute Resolution (9)
- Judges (9)
- Law and Economics (9)
- Economics (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Commercial Law (6)
- Conflict of Laws (6)
- Environmental Law (6)
- Evidence (6)
- International Law (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- Corporations (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- Torts (5)
- Agency (4)
- Arts and Entertainment (4)
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
An Idea Whose Time Has (Sort Of) Come: Bapcpa Provides Direct Appeals From Bankruptcy Courts To Circuit Courts In Limited Situations, David George
ExpressO
This article deals with a provision in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 that allows direct appeals from bankruptcy courts to circuit courts. For years, many have sought direct appeals to circuit courts, contending that it will increase certainty in bankruptcy proceedings and make them more efficient. This article describes the new direct-appeal provision and discusses the procedures that are being developed.
The Action Bias In American Law: Internet Jurisdiction And The Triumph Of Zippo Dot Com, Richard Greenstein
The Action Bias In American Law: Internet Jurisdiction And The Triumph Of Zippo Dot Com, Richard Greenstein
ExpressO
American law reflects the stories we tell ourselves about who we are as a nation. To illustrate the effect of America’s stories on the law, I identify and describe in this essay a particular characteristic of American law: an “action bias” – a propensity to bestow disproportionately greater legal significance upon affirmative acts than on failures to act – and I argue that this bias reflects, in turn, a powerful myth at the core of the self-image of the United States, a myth I call the “Immigrant’s Tale.”
To illustrate this thesis, I give a number of instances of the …
Just Say "No Fishing": The Lure Of Metaphor, Beth Thornburg
Just Say "No Fishing": The Lure Of Metaphor, Beth Thornburg
ExpressO
The phrase “fishing expedition” is widely used in popular culture and in the law. In the case of metaphorical “fishing” in the law, reliance on the metaphor can act as a substitute for rigorous analysis, disguising the factors that influence a result. When used by the court, it is uninformative. Worse, the fishing metaphor may itself shape the way the court thinks about the kind of issue or claim involved. Accusations of “fishing” also affect the language and position of the litigants. Parties arguing against pleadings or discovery use the metaphor as a rhetorical weapon, stigmatizing their opponents, instead of …
Choosing Tribal Law: Why State Choice-Of-Law Principles Should Apply To Disputes With Tribal Contacts, Katherine J. Florey
Choosing Tribal Law: Why State Choice-Of-Law Principles Should Apply To Disputes With Tribal Contacts, Katherine J. Florey
ExpressO
This article considers a problem in Indian law that has been much commented upon but little explored: When a state court exercises jurisdiction over a case with tribal contacts, what law should govern? While the Supreme Court has developed a detailed set of rules dictating whether cases with tribal contacts should be heard in a state or tribal forum, it has devoted almost no attention to the question of which law should apply once a forum has been chosen. Thus, many state courts have simply assumed, without explicit consideration of the issue, that state law should apply to any case …
Due Process And Punitive Damages: The Error Of Federal Excessiveness Jurisprudence, A. Benjamin Spencer
Due Process And Punitive Damages: The Error Of Federal Excessiveness Jurisprudence, A. Benjamin Spencer
ExpressO
The Supreme Court, in a line of several cases over the past decade, has established a rigorous federal constitutional excessiveness review for punitive damages awards based on the Due Process Clause. As a matter of substantive due process, says the Court, punitive awards must be evaluated by three “guideposts” set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore: the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct, the ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, and a comparison of the amount of punitive damages to any “civil or criminal penalties that could be imposed for comparable misconduct.” Following up on this pronouncement …