Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States (7)
- Endangered Species Act (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- California (3)
-
- ESA (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Critical habitat designation (2)
- Economic loss (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (2)
- Property rights (2)
- Public resources (2)
- Section 9 (2)
- Takings law (2)
- 1993-94 sessions (1)
- 5th Amendment (1)
- Ad hoc factual inquiry (1)
- Advance planning and regulating (1)
- Affirmative actions (1)
- Alternatives (1)
- American West (1)
- Appropriation rights (1)
- Attorneys’ fees (1)
- Available water supplies (1)
- Avoid jeopardy (1)
- Balkanization of legal precepts (1)
- Beneficial use of water right (1)
- Biological considerations (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings—The Government Lawyer’S Perspective, Richard M. Frank
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings—The Government Lawyer’S Perspective, Richard M. Frank
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
11 pages.
Contains 3 pages of references.
Searching For Basinwide Solutions To Endangered Species Problems Of The South Platte Of Colorado, James S. Lochhead
Searching For Basinwide Solutions To Endangered Species Problems Of The South Platte Of Colorado, James S. Lochhead
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
42 pages (includes illustrations and map).
Contains endnotes.
Management Approaches To Addressing Takings Issues: Endangered Species Protection, I. Michael Heyman
Management Approaches To Addressing Takings Issues: Endangered Species Protection, I. Michael Heyman
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla
Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages (includes 1 map).
Contains footnotes.
The Fifth Amendment And The Retained Sovereignty Doctrine: A Study Of The Endangered Species Act And The Central Valley Project Improvement Act As Applied To Central Valley Project Water Service Contracts, Brian E. Gray
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
12 pages.
The Endangered Species Act And Constitutional Takings, Robert Meltz
The Endangered Species Act And Constitutional Takings, Robert Meltz
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
18 pages.
Contains references.
“Takings” And The Endangered Species Act, Oliver A. Houck
“Takings” And The Endangered Species Act, Oliver A. Houck
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
3 pages.
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
Sponsored by the University of Colorado's Natural Resources Law Center and the Byron R. White Center for American Constitutional Study.
Conference organizers, faculty and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Gene R. Nichol, Jr. and Mark Squillace.
Governmental regulation for environmental protection and other important public purposes can affect the manner in which land and natural resources are developed and used. The U.S. constitution (and most state constitutions) prohibit the government from "taking" property without payment of compensation. Originally intended to apply to situations where the government physically seized private property …
Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, Virginia S. Albrecht
Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, Virginia S. Albrecht
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
52 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Elevated Pleading In Environmental Litigation, Carl W. Tobias
Elevated Pleading In Environmental Litigation, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
The recent United States Supreme Court opinion in Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit is critical to parties and attorneys who participate in environmental litigation. Leatherman proscribed the imposition of pleading requirements that are stricter than those ordinarily applied under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Such heightened pleading requirements compel plaintiffs to plead more facts, and courts can dismiss claims that fall short of the mark.
The Leatherman court considered civil rights actions alleging that municipalities are liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.2 Although Leatherman might seem of limited relevance to environmental lawsuits, its holding and …
Recovery For Economic Loss Following The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Victor P. Goldberg
Recovery For Economic Loss Following The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
The physical cleanup following one of the worst oil spills in history, that of the Exxon Valdez, is done. The legal cleanup, however, has barely begun. Over 100 law firms participating in over 200 suits in federal and state courts involving more than 30,000 claims are presently engaged in litigation. Fishermen, cannery workers, fishing lodges, tour boat operators, oil companies whose shipments were delayed, and even California motorists facing higher gasoline prices have filed claims against Exxon and its fellow defendants.
Most claimants face a formidable roadblock, the so-called Robins doctrine. Under Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint …