Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (33)
- State and Local Government Law (26)
- Constitutional Law (24)
- Environmental Sciences (22)
- Land Use Law (22)
-
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (22)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (22)
- Property Law and Real Estate (21)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (20)
- Legislation (19)
- Administrative Law (18)
- Environmental Policy (18)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (18)
- Environmental Health and Protection (17)
- Natural Resources Law (15)
- Water Resource Management (14)
- Environmental Law (12)
- Water Law (12)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (8)
- Public Policy (6)
- Evidence (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Torts (4)
- Agency (3)
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (22)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
-
- University of San Diego (3)
- Selected Works (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States (14)
- Supreme Court (10)
- Litigation (9)
- Fifth Amendment (8)
- California (6)
-
- Discovery (4)
- Endangered Species Act (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Takings Clause (4)
- California Courts of Appeal (3)
- Compensation (3)
- ESA (3)
- Economic loss (3)
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (3)
- Property rights (3)
- Regulatory takings (3)
- Adjudication (2)
- Case law (2)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Critical habitat designation (2)
- Due Process Clause (2)
- Due process (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Expert evidence (2)
- Fairness (2)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Government regulation (2)
- Just compensation clause (2)
- Publication
-
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (22)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles (3)
-
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Paul R. Tremblay (1)
- Perry S. Bechky (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Reinventing Fcc Adjudication, Sidney White Rhyne
Reinventing Fcc Adjudication, Sidney White Rhyne
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Antitrust And First Amendment Implications Of Professional Real Estate Investors, Gary Myers
Antitrust And First Amendment Implications Of Professional Real Estate Investors, Gary Myers
Faculty Publications
This article begins with a discussion of the development of Noerr-Pennington immunity as it applies to litigation behavior. Parts III and IV describe the litigation in Professional Real Estate Investors and then analyze the effect of this new decision on predatory litigation law. Part V discusses possible ramifications of the case for other areas of federal and state law in which subjective intent is the sole keystone for the imposition of liability on petitioning activity. Because Professional Real Estate Investors interprets the First Amendment to preclude antitrust liability in these cases, other laws that deter bad faith litigation may no …
Litigation, E. D'Angelo
Psychological Barriers To Litigation Settlement: An Experimental Approach, Russell Korobkin, Chris Guthrie
Psychological Barriers To Litigation Settlement: An Experimental Approach, Russell Korobkin, Chris Guthrie
Michigan Law Review
In this article, we seek to substantiate "psychological barriers," as illustrated by the constructs described above, as a third explanation for the failure of legal disputants to settle out of court. Although we are not the first to hypothesize that psychological processes can, in theory, affect legal dispute negotiations, we attempt to give more definition to the otherwise vague contours of the psychological barriers hypothesis by bringing empirical data to bear on the question. To achieve this end, we conducted a series of nine laboratory experiments - involving nearly 450 subjects - designed to isolate the effects of the three …
Presidential Power: Should Bill Clinton Be Immune From Lawsuits On Allegations Of Past Acts?, Susan Low Bloch
Presidential Power: Should Bill Clinton Be Immune From Lawsuits On Allegations Of Past Acts?, Susan Low Bloch
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
When former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones filed her complaint against Bill Clinton she joined a small group of women who have publicly accused men in high-profile positions of sexual harassment.
A classic "he said, she said" story? We may never know, if the president is able to argue successfully that his office shields him from liability for actions occurring prior to assuming it. On June 27, his lawyer, Robert Bennett, asked a federal court to delay action, and said he would be filing a separate motion in August on the issue.
The defense is based on the 1982 case …
Logic And The Common Law Trial, Richard H. Underwood
Logic And The Common Law Trial, Richard H. Underwood
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In this article, the author explores some of the inconsistencies between logic and the practice of law. The article draws together numerous anecdotes and examples of situations in which common sense was rejected or ignored in the name of legal procedure. The article focuses on various argument styles employed by lawyers.
Litigation, E. D'Angelo
"Presumptions And Burdens Of Proof As Tools For Legal Stability And Change, Tamar Frankel
"Presumptions And Burdens Of Proof As Tools For Legal Stability And Change, Tamar Frankel
Faculty Scholarship
Presumptions and burdens of proof are used, among other purposes, to maintain legal stability and at the same time effect change. By imposing the burden of proof on the party asserting a certain outcome, courts can calibrate burdens of proof and substantive rules until experience points to rule retention or amendment. As agents of change, presumptions and burdens of proof are far more flexible and less brittle than rules.1
This Article tells the story of presumptions and burdens of proof in litigation between corporate shareholders and managements. This litigation is replete with volatile presumptions and innovative burdens of proof, …
The Reluctant Partner: Making Procedural Law For International Civil Litigation, Stephen B. Burbank
The Reluctant Partner: Making Procedural Law For International Civil Litigation, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings—The Government Lawyer’S Perspective, Richard M. Frank
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings—The Government Lawyer’S Perspective, Richard M. Frank
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
11 pages.
Contains 3 pages of references.
Takings And Water Rights [Includes Unsigned Annotations By David Getches], David H. Getches
Takings And Water Rights [Includes Unsigned Annotations By David Getches], David H. Getches
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
13 pages (includes 1 illustration).
Includes unsigned annotations by David Getches.
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings: A Growing Battlefield, Barton H. Thompson, Jr.
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings: A Growing Battlefield, Barton H. Thompson, Jr.
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
43 pages.
Contains references.
Searching For Basinwide Solutions To Endangered Species Problems Of The South Platte Of Colorado, James S. Lochhead
Searching For Basinwide Solutions To Endangered Species Problems Of The South Platte Of Colorado, James S. Lochhead
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
42 pages (includes illustrations and map).
Contains endnotes.
Management Approaches To Addressing Takings Issues: Endangered Species Protection, I. Michael Heyman
Management Approaches To Addressing Takings Issues: Endangered Species Protection, I. Michael Heyman
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla
Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages (includes 1 map).
Contains footnotes.
Mining Regulation And Takings, Mark Squillace
Mining Regulation And Takings, Mark Squillace
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
10 pages.
Contains footnotes.
The Fifth Amendment And The Retained Sovereignty Doctrine: A Study Of The Endangered Species Act And The Central Valley Project Improvement Act As Applied To Central Valley Project Water Service Contracts, Brian E. Gray
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
12 pages.
Mining Regulation(S) And Takings, Lawrence G. Mcbride
Mining Regulation(S) And Takings, Lawrence G. Mcbride
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
12 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Mining Regulation And Takings, L. Thomas Galloway
Mining Regulation And Takings, L. Thomas Galloway
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
What A Federal Natural Resource Management Agency Can Do To Avoid Takings, John D. Leshy
What A Federal Natural Resource Management Agency Can Do To Avoid Takings, John D. Leshy
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
6 pages.
Property Rights And Public Resources, Mark L. Pollot
Property Rights And Public Resources, Mark L. Pollot
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
The Endangered Species Act And Constitutional Takings, Robert Meltz
The Endangered Species Act And Constitutional Takings, Robert Meltz
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
18 pages.
Contains references.
Regulatory Taking Of Public Water And Land Resource Development Rights After Lucas, Jerome C. Muys
Regulatory Taking Of Public Water And Land Resource Development Rights After Lucas, Jerome C. Muys
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
7 pages.
“Takings” And The Endangered Species Act, Oliver A. Houck
“Takings” And The Endangered Species Act, Oliver A. Houck
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
3 pages.
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
City Of Tigard And Takings Law, Richard D. Lazarus
City Of Tigard And Takings Law, Richard D. Lazarus
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
10 pages.
Contains 1 page of references.
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages.
Contains references.
Background Principles Of Wetlands Law: The Early History, Fred P. Bosselman
Background Principles Of Wetlands Law: The Early History, Fred P. Bosselman
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Contains 3 pages of references.
The Regulatory Takings Doctrine: A Critical Overview, J. Peter Byrne
The Regulatory Takings Doctrine: A Critical Overview, J. Peter Byrne
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
Sponsored by the University of Colorado's Natural Resources Law Center and the Byron R. White Center for American Constitutional Study.
Conference organizers, faculty and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Gene R. Nichol, Jr. and Mark Squillace.
Governmental regulation for environmental protection and other important public purposes can affect the manner in which land and natural resources are developed and used. The U.S. constitution (and most state constitutions) prohibit the government from "taking" property without payment of compensation. Originally intended to apply to situations where the government physically seized private property …