Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (84)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (32)
- University of Michigan Law School (30)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
-
- New York Law School (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Belmont University (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of South Florida (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (15)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Supreme Court (10)
- Unpublished opinions (10)
- Judge (9)
-
- Justice (9)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Chief Judge (6)
- Constitutional Convention (6)
- Dual Constitutionalism (6)
- Gender (6)
- Judith S. Kaye (6)
- Justice Brennan (6)
- New York (6)
- New York City Bar Association (6)
- New York Court of Appeals (6)
- Opportunity (6)
- SFFA (6)
- Skadden (6)
- Women lawyers (6)
- Black Law Student Association (5)
- Black Law Students (5)
- Black Laywers (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Feminism (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Symposium (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Formalism (4)
- Interpretation (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (84)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (32)
- Michigan Law Review (29)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (11)
- Brooklyn Law Review (6)
-
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Nevada Law Journal (6)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (3)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- IP Theory (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Belmont Law Review (1)
- Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (1)
- The Modern American (1)
- University of Baltimore Law Review (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William Mitchell Law Review (1)
Articles 151 - 180 of 206
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
United States V. Grier, Lyndsay V. Ruotolo
Constitutional Law And Values—Version ’08 (Not Necessarily An Upgrade), Nadine Strossen
Constitutional Law And Values—Version ’08 (Not Necessarily An Upgrade), Nadine Strossen
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
God Vs. The Gavel: A Brief Rejoinder, Douglas Laycock
God Vs. The Gavel: A Brief Rejoinder, Douglas Laycock
Michigan Law Review
I recently reviewed God vs. the Gavel by Professor Marci Hamilton, and she published a brief response. My review briefly summarized the book and then made three principal points, addressing Hamilton's institutional competence thesis, her "no-harm" principle, and the remarkable number of legal and factual errors in the book. In this reply, I will review each of these points in turn.
Classic Revisited: Penal Theory In Paradise Lost, Jillisa Brittan, Richard A. Posner
Classic Revisited: Penal Theory In Paradise Lost, Jillisa Brittan, Richard A. Posner
Michigan Law Review
Milton's great poem can be enjoyed as a supernatural adventure story in the epic tradition-indeed almost as a science-fiction fantasy. An incredibly powerful supernatural figure-call him Father-lives on planet Heaven somewhere in outer space, surrounded by lesser supernatural beings, called Angels. Father begets Son asexually, and declares his intent to give him vice regal authority. Infuriated at Son's being promoted over him, the foremost Angel, L leads a third of the Angels in violent rebellion against Father and Son. At first it seems the rebels will best the loyal Angels. But Father sends in Son to defeat the rebels all …
Political Advocacy On The Supreme Court: The Damaging Rhetoric Of Antonin Scalia, Stephen A. Newman
Political Advocacy On The Supreme Court: The Damaging Rhetoric Of Antonin Scalia, Stephen A. Newman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Only A Sith Thinks Like That”: Llewellyn’S “Dueling Canons,” One To Seven, Michael Sinclair
“Only A Sith Thinks Like That”: Llewellyn’S “Dueling Canons,” One To Seven, Michael Sinclair
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judges As Trustees: A Duty To Account And An Opportunity For Virtue, Sarah M. R. Cravens
Judges As Trustees: A Duty To Account And An Opportunity For Virtue, Sarah M. R. Cravens
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About Little: Explaining The Sturm Und Drang Over The Citation Of Unpublished Opinions, Patrick J. Schiltz
Much Ado About Little: Explaining The Sturm Und Drang Over The Citation Of Unpublished Opinions, Patrick J. Schiltz
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Take A Letter, Your Honor: Outing The Judicial Epistemology Of Hart V. Massanari, Penelope Pether
Take A Letter, Your Honor: Outing The Judicial Epistemology Of Hart V. Massanari, Penelope Pether
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parades Of Horribles, Circles Of Hell: Ethical Dimensions Of The Publication Controversy, David S. Caudill
Parades Of Horribles, Circles Of Hell: Ethical Dimensions Of The Publication Controversy, David S. Caudill
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commentary: Unpublication And The Judicial Concept Of Audience, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Commentary: Unpublication And The Judicial Concept Of Audience, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dog That Did Not Bark: No-Citation Rules, Judicial Conference Rulemaking, And Federal Public Defenders, Stephen R. Barnett
The Dog That Did Not Bark: No-Citation Rules, Judicial Conference Rulemaking, And Federal Public Defenders, Stephen R. Barnett
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Triage: Reflections On The Debate Over Unpublished Opinions, David C. Vladeck, Mitu Gulati
Judicial Triage: Reflections On The Debate Over Unpublished Opinions, David C. Vladeck, Mitu Gulati
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unspoken Questions In The Rule 32.1 Debate: Precedent And Psychology In Judging, David E. Klein
Unspoken Questions In The Rule 32.1 Debate: Precedent And Psychology In Judging, David E. Klein
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Publishing Dissent, Arthur J. Jacobson
Publishing Dissent, Arthur J. Jacobson
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About The Tip Of An Iceberg, William M. Richman
Much Ado About The Tip Of An Iceberg, William M. Richman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Circuit Publication Practices, Carl Tobias
Fourth Circuit Publication Practices, Carl Tobias
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Theory In Search Of A Court, And Itself: Judicial Minimalism At The Supreme Court Bar, Neil S. Siegel
A Theory In Search Of A Court, And Itself: Judicial Minimalism At The Supreme Court Bar, Neil S. Siegel
Michigan Law Review
According to the prevailing wisdom in academic public law, constitutional theory is a field that seeks to articulate and evaluate abstract accounts of the nature of the United States Constitution. Theorists offer those accounts as guides to subsequent judicial construction of constitutional provisions. As typically conceived, therefore, constitutional theory tends to proceed analytically from the general to the particular; its animating idea is that correct decisions in constitutional cases presuppose theoretical commitments to the methodological principles that should guide constitutional interpretation and the substantive values such interpretation should advance. In its enthusiasm for abstraction, constitutional theory has, at times, generated …
Kruse V. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (Decided September 10, 2004), Jennifer Katehos
Kruse V. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (Decided September 10, 2004), Jennifer Katehos
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Helen Meyer
Foreword, Helen Meyer
William Mitchell Law Review
The William Mitchell Law Review has decided once again to dedicate one issue of this annual volume to Recent Decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court. This issue reviews some of the court’s more important decisions from the 2003-04 term. If tradition is honored, the articles and notes you find in these pages will be thorough, well-written, and thoughtful in their analysis of each decision. This annual review is a tradition that gives our legal community a wonderful opportunity to publicly comment on the work of the court. This public testing of the court’s work is a healthy part of the …
No-Citation Rules Under Siege: A Battlefield Report And Analysis, Stephen R. Barnett
No-Citation Rules Under Siege: A Battlefield Report And Analysis, Stephen R. Barnett
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Unruliness Of Rules, Peter A. Alces
The Unruliness Of Rules, Peter A. Alces
Michigan Law Review
Analytical jurisprudence depends on a posited relation between rules and morality. Before we may answer persistent and important questions of legal theory - indeed, before we can even know what those questions are - we must understand not just the operation of rules but their operation in relation to morality. Once that relationship is formulated, we may then come to terms with the likes of inductive reasoning in Law, the role of precedent, and the fit, such as it is, between Natural Law and Positivism as well as even the coincidence (or lack thereof) between inclusive and exclusive positivism. That …
Meaning's Edge, Love's Priority, Patrick Mckinley Brennan
Meaning's Edge, Love's Priority, Patrick Mckinley Brennan
Michigan Law Review
The story is told of an American wending his way through the British Museum. Reaching the Rosetta Stone, he reached right over the railing, touched the scarred slab, and lamented: "It doesn't feel meaningful." Whereupon an old Briton was heard to mumble: "The poor American's got this old thing confused with the Blarney Stone." A bully presses his case, but meaning is much more modest. Powerless to insist upon itself, meaning lies in wait of discovery. What distinguishes the Rosetta Stone from other rocks of the same kind and size is that it was someone's - or rather a group's …
Interpretation And Institutions, Cass R. Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule
Interpretation And Institutions, Cass R. Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule
Michigan Law Review
Suppose that a statute, enacted several decades ago, bans the introduction of any color additive in food if that additive "causes cancer" in human beings or animals. Suppose that new technologies, able to detect low-level carcinogens, have shown that many potential additives cause cancer, even though the statistical risk is often tiny - akin to the risk of eating two peanuts with governmentally-permitted levels of aflatoxins. Suppose, finally, that a company seeks to introduce a certain color additive into food, acknowledging that the additive causes cancer, but urging that the risk is infinitesimal, and that if the statutory barrier were …
Reply: The Institutional Dimension Of Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, Richard A. Posner
Reply: The Institutional Dimension Of Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, Richard A. Posner
Michigan Law Review
Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule argue in Interpretation and lnstitutions that judicial interpretation of statutes and constitutions should take account both of the institutional framework within which interpretation takes place and of the consequences of different styles of interpretation; they further argue that this point has been neglected by previous scholars. The first half of the thesis is correct but obvious; the second half, which the authors state in terms emphatic to the point of being immodest, is incorrect. Moreover, the authors offer no feasible suggestions for how the relation between interpretation and the institutional framework might be studied better …
Interpretive Theory In Its Infancy: A Reply To Posner, Cass R. Sunstein, Adrien Vermeule
Interpretive Theory In Its Infancy: A Reply To Posner, Cass R. Sunstein, Adrien Vermeule
Michigan Law Review
In law, problems of interpretation can be explored at different levels of generality. At the most specific level, people might urge that the Equal Protection Clause forbids affirmative action, or that the Food and Drug Act applies to tobacco products. At a higher level of generality, people might argue that the Equal Protection Clause should be interpreted in accordance with the original understanding of its ratifiers, or that the meaning of the Food and Drug Act should be settled with careful attention to its legislative history. At a still higher level of generality, people might identify the considerations that bear …
From Pens To Pixels: Text-Media Issues In Promulgating, Archiving, And Using Judicial Opinions, Kenneth H. Ryesky
From Pens To Pixels: Text-Media Issues In Promulgating, Archiving, And Using Judicial Opinions, Kenneth H. Ryesky
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Legal Orientalism, Teemu Ruskola
Legal Orientalism, Teemu Ruskola
Michigan Law Review
Fifty years ago comparative law was a field in search of a paradigm. In the inaugural issue of the American Journal of Comparative Law in 1952, Myres McDougal remarked unhappily, "The greatest confusion continues to prevail about what is being compared, about the purposes of comparison, and about appropriate techniques." In short, there seemed to be very little in the field that was not in a state of confusion. Two decades later, referring to McDougal's bleak assessment, John Merryman saw no evidence of progress: "few comparative lawyers would suggest that matters have since improved." And only a few years ago, …
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Michigan Law Review
If one wishes to revisit a classic, Albert Crunus's The Fall is a riskier choice than Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, which Steven Lubet eloquently discussed last year in these pages. It is not only that Camus's work will be less familiar to legal audiences than Lee's, despite the fact that The Fall is becoming recognized through critical "revisitation" as perhaps Crunus's greatest novel. It is also that the legal protagonist of The Fall, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, does not have Atticus Finch's immediate appeal. Finch is idealistic, Clamence is existential; Finch is pious, Clamence is debauched; Finch is hopeful, Clamence …
Foreword: The Question Of Process, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
Foreword: The Question Of Process, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
Michigan Law Review
Many in the legal profession have abandoned the great questions of legal process. This is too bad. How a decision is reached can be as important as what the decision is. In an increasingly diverse country with many competing visions of the good, it is critical for law to aspire to agreement on process - a task both more achievable than agreement on substance and more suited to our profession than waving the banners of ideological truth. By process, I mean the institutional routes by which we in America reach our most crucial decisions. In other words, process is our …