Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Jurisprudence (79)
- Constitutional Law (41)
- Law and Society (40)
- Law and Politics (27)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (27)
-
- Judges (21)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (18)
- Arts and Humanities (17)
- Courts (15)
- Legislation (15)
- Civil Law (14)
- Law and Economics (13)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (12)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (11)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (11)
- Litigation (11)
- Religion Law (11)
- Economics (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Legal Profession (10)
- Commercial Law (9)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- Legal Education (9)
- Legal Writing and Research (9)
- English Language and Literature (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- American Studies (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Allen Mendenhall (9)
- Brian M McCall (5)
- Ian C Bartrum (4)
- Jorge Adame Goddard (4)
- Justin Schwartz (4)
-
- Adam Lamparello (3)
- Carlo A. Pedrioli (3)
- Assaf Likhovski (2)
- Charles W. Murdock (2)
- Daniel R. Coquillette (2)
- David S Caudill (2)
- Donald J. Kochan (2)
- Michael S. Green (2)
- Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London (2)
- Robert Rodes (2)
- Thomas L. Shaffer (2)
- Wouter H. de Been (2)
- Andrés Palacios Lleras (1)
- Anna P. Hemingway (1)
- Annelise Riles (1)
- Benedict Sheehy (1)
- Bryan T Camp (1)
- Caprice L. Roberts (1)
- Cathren Page (1)
- Charles E. A. Lincoln IV (1)
- Charles H. Baron (1)
- Chris R Copeland (1)
- D. A. Jeremy Telman (1)
- Daniel J Boyle (1)
- Daniel M Braun (1)
- File Type
Articles 91 - 106 of 106
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Much Ado About Pluralities: Pride And Precedent Amidst The Cacophy Of Concurrences, And Re-Percolation After Rapanos, Donald J. Kochan, Melissa M. Berry, Matthew J. Parlow
Much Ado About Pluralities: Pride And Precedent Amidst The Cacophy Of Concurrences, And Re-Percolation After Rapanos, Donald J. Kochan, Melissa M. Berry, Matthew J. Parlow
Donald J. Kochan
Conflicts created by concurrences and pluralities in court decisions create confusion in law and lower court interpretation. Rule of law values require that individuals be able to identify controlling legal principles. That task is complicated when pluralities and concurrences contribute to the vagueness or uncertainty that leaves us wondering what the controlling rule is or attempting to predict what it will evolve to become. The rule of law is at least handicapped when continuity or confidence or confusion infuse our understanding of the applicable rules. This Article uses the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Rapanos v. United States to …
The Dao Of Jurisprudence: The Art And Science Of Optimal Justice, Daniel J. Boyle
The Dao Of Jurisprudence: The Art And Science Of Optimal Justice, Daniel J. Boyle
Daniel J Boyle
The law intersects with reality in order to influence or control behavior in an evolutionary process that filters or mediates society through the voices and influences of the actors affected. By modeling this system at the highest levels of generalization, we can explore notions of optimality.
The Status Of Classical Natural Law: Plato And The Parochialism Of Modern Theory, Eric Heinze
The Status Of Classical Natural Law: Plato And The Parochialism Of Modern Theory, Eric Heinze
Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London
The concept of modernity has long been central to legal theory. It is an intrinsically temporal concept, expressly or implicitly defined in contrast to pre-modernity.
Legal theorists sometimes draw comparisons between, on the one hand, various post-Renaissance positivist, liberal, realist or critical theories, and, on the other hand, the classical natural law or justice theories of antiquity or the middle ages, including such figures as Aristotle, Cicero, Augustine or Aquinas. Many theorists, however, while acknowledging superficial differences among the various classical theories, fail to appreciate the variety and complexity of pre-modern thought. Unduly simplifying pre-modern understandings of law, they end …
Epinomia: Plato And The First Legal Theory, Eric Heinze
Epinomia: Plato And The First Legal Theory, Eric Heinze
Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London
In comparison to Aristotle, Plato’s general understanding of law receives little attention in legal theory, due in part to ongoing perceptions of him as a mystic or a totalitarian. However, some of the critical or communitarian themes that have guided theorists since Aristotle already find strong expression in Plato’s work. More than any thinker until the 19th and 20th centuries, Plato rejects the rank individualism and self-interest which, in his view, emerge within democratic legal culture. He rejects schisms between legal norms and community values, institutional separation of law from morals, intricate regimes of legislation and adjudication, and a culture …
Lacan, Law, And Science: Striking The Balance Between Real And Symbolic, David Caudill
Lacan, Law, And Science: Striking The Balance Between Real And Symbolic, David Caudill
David S Caudill
No abstract provided.
Under A Critical Race Theory Lens – Brown V. Board Of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone And Its Troubled Legacy, Carlo Pedrioli
Under A Critical Race Theory Lens – Brown V. Board Of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone And Its Troubled Legacy, Carlo Pedrioli
Carlo A. Pedrioli
This critical book review argues that James T. Patterson’s narrative in, "Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy," is a mostly balanced historical reflection. Here, the term balanced will refer to giving consideration to both the negative and positive aspects of the phenomenon in question. To advance its thesis, the book review initially offers an overview of Patterson’s historical narrative and evaluation of the Brown legacy. Then the book review analyzes Patterson’s conclusions through a Critical Race Theory lens. Given the focus of Critical Race Theory on race and the law, especially on how …
A Key Influence On The Doctrine Of Actual Malice: Justice William Brennan’S Judicial Philosophy At Work In Changing The Law Of Seditious Libel, Carlo A. Pedrioli
A Key Influence On The Doctrine Of Actual Malice: Justice William Brennan’S Judicial Philosophy At Work In Changing The Law Of Seditious Libel, Carlo A. Pedrioli
Carlo A. Pedrioli
In light of the historical change in the law of seditious libel that New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) prompted and the need for further exploration of the human factors behind the case, this article gives attention to William Brennan’s judicial philosophy at work in the case. The article defines judicial philosophy as a system of guiding principles upon which a judge calls in the process of legal decision-making. Specifically, the article explains how, through Times v. Sullivan, Brennan’s instrumentalist judicial philosophy had an important influence on changing the course of legal protection for criticism of the government in the …
The Secession Reference And The Limits Of Law, Richard Kay
The Secession Reference And The Limits Of Law, Richard Kay
Richard Kay
When the Supreme Court of Canada issued its judgment on the legality of "unilateral" Quebec secession in August 1998 many Canadians did not know what to make of it. The Court held that the only lawful way in which Quebec might depart the Canadian federation was through one of the amendment mechanisms provided in the Constitution Act 1982. It thus affirmed that Quebec could not secede without the agreement of at least the Houses of the federal Parliament and some number of provincial legislative assemblies. Prime Minister Chretien declared the next day that the judgement was a "victory for all …
La Libertad Como La Propiedad Personal De Hacer Lo Que Uno Quiere, Jorge Carlos Adame
La Libertad Como La Propiedad Personal De Hacer Lo Que Uno Quiere, Jorge Carlos Adame
Jorge Adame Goddard
No abstract provided.
Of Enchantment: The Passing Of The Ordeals And The Rise Of The Jury Trial, Trisha Olson
Of Enchantment: The Passing Of The Ordeals And The Rise Of The Jury Trial, Trisha Olson
Trisha Olson
No abstract provided.
Introducción Al Derecho Nuevo, Jorge Carlos Adame
Introducción Al Derecho Nuevo, Jorge Carlos Adame
Jorge Adame Goddard
No abstract provided.
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
THIS PAPER IS THE CO-WINNER OF THE FRED BERGER PRIZE IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW FOR THE 1999 AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BEST PUBLISHED PAPER IN THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS.
The conflict between liberal legal theory and critical legal studies (CLS) is often framed as a matter of whether there is a theory of justice that the law should embody which all rational people could or must accept. In a divided society, the CLS critique of this view is overwhelming: there is no such justice that can command universal assent. But the liberal critique of CLS, that it degenerates into …
Persona Humana Y Persona Jurídica, Jorge Carlos Adame
Persona Humana Y Persona Jurídica, Jorge Carlos Adame
Jorge Adame Goddard
No abstract provided.
El Derecho Como Jurisprudencia, Jorge Carlos Adame
El Derecho Como Jurisprudencia, Jorge Carlos Adame
Jorge Adame Goddard
No abstract provided.
The Paradox Of Ideology, Justin Schwartz
The Paradox Of Ideology, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A standard problem with the objectivity of social scientific theory in particular is that it is either self-referential, in which case it seems to undermine itself as ideology, or self-excepting, which seem pragmatically self-refuting. Using the example of Marx and his theory of ideology, I show how self-referential theories that include themselves in their scope of explanation can be objective. Ideology may be roughly defined as belief distorted by class interest. I show how Marx thought that natural science was informed by class interest but not therefore necessarily ideology. Capitalists have an interest in understanding the natural world (to a …
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A number of (present or former) analytical Marxists, such as Jon Elster, have argued that functional explanation has almost no place in the social sciences. (Although the discussion is framed in terms of a debate among analytical Marxists, the point is quite general, and Marxism is used for illustrative purposes.) Functional explanation accounts for what is to be explained by reference to its function; thus, sighted organism have eyes because eyes enable them to see. Elster and other critics of functional explanation argue that this pattern of explanation is inconsistent with "methodological individualism," the idea, as they understand it, that …