Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2)
- "Actual Reduction to Practice" (1)
- "DCF Method" (1)
- "Discount Cash Flow" (1)
- "Increased Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate" (1)
-
- "Jack Daniel's Whiskey" (1)
- "Paper patent doctrine" (1)
- "Patent Obsolescence" (1)
- "Post-Emancipation Slavery through the 1960s" (1)
- "Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade" (1)
- "patent valuation" (1)
- "valuing Intellectual Property" (1)
- Akazzawa v. Link New Technology Intern (1)
- CJEU (1)
- Charter of fundamental rights (1)
- Communication (1)
- Copyright violations (1)
- Court of justice of the european union (1)
- Design (1)
- Directive 2019/790 (1)
- Distillery (1)
- EU (1)
- EU Directive (1)
- EU Directive 2019/790 (1)
- Ecommerce (1)
- Estate Planning (1)
- Eu jurisprudence (1)
- European Union (1)
- European parliament and council (1)
- Fashion (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Seattle University Law Review
Ipse Dixit, the podcast on legal scholarship, provides a valuable service to the legal community and particularly to the legal academy. The podcast’s hosts skillfully interview guests about their legal and law-related scholarship, helping those guests communicate their ideas clearly and concisely. In this review essay, I argue that Ipse Dixit has made a major contribution to legal scholarship by demonstrating in its interview episodes that law review articles are neither the only nor the best way of communicating scholarly ideas. This contribution should be considered “scholarship,” because one of the primary goals of scholarship is to communicate new ideas.
Poland’S Challenge To Eu Directive 2019/790: Standing Up To The Destruction Of European Freedom Of Expression, Michaela Cloutier
Poland’S Challenge To Eu Directive 2019/790: Standing Up To The Destruction Of European Freedom Of Expression, Michaela Cloutier
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 2019, the European Parliament and Council passed Directive 2019/790. The Directive’s passage marked the end of a fouryear- long legislative attempt to impose more liability for copyright violations on Online Service Providers, an effort which was controversial from the start. Online Service Providers fear that the 2019 Directive, especially its Article 17, will completely change the structure of liability on the Internet, forcing providers to adopt expensive content filtering systems. Free speech advocates fear that ineffective filtering technology will infringe upon Internet users’ rights to express themselves, and legal scholars have pointed out the Directive’s inconsistency with prior European …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Determining Patent Worthlesseness For Tax Purposes, Christina Sumer
Determining Patent Worthlesseness For Tax Purposes, Christina Sumer
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
None.
Whiskey Sour: An Ip Evaluation Of Nathan Green's Contribution To Jack Daniel's Whiskey And How That Contribution Led To An Inequitable Distribution Of Generational Wealth, Emmanuel Onochie
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
None.
Confusion, Conflict, And Case Law: Analyzing The Language Of The United States Patent Act And Conflicting Case Law Regarding The Transfer Of Patent Rights In The 21st Century, Lucas C. Logic
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright & Fashion: The Shoe That Does Not Fit, Cassandra Baloga
Copyright & Fashion: The Shoe That Does Not Fit, Cassandra Baloga
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jefferson’S Taper, Jeremy N. Sheff
Jefferson’S Taper, Jeremy N. Sheff
SMU Law Review
This Article reports a new discovery concerning the intellectual genealogy of one of American intellectual property law’s most important texts. The text is Thomas Jefferson’s often-cited letter to Isaac McPherson regarding the absence of a natural right of property in inventions, metaphorically illustrated by a “taper” that spreads light from one person to another without diminishing the light at its source. I demonstrate that Thomas Jefferson likely copied this Parable of the Taper from a nearly identical passage in Cicero’s De Officiis, and I show how this borrowing situates Jefferson’s thoughts on intellectual property firmly within a natural law theory …
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents