Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright law (4)
- Copyright (2)
- History (2)
- Infringement (2)
- Inventions (2)
-
- Ambiguities (1)
- American Society of Broadcasters Composers and Publishers (1)
- Authorship (1)
- Blanchard v. Hill (1)
- Cases (1)
- Commerce (1)
- Communications (1)
- Competition (1)
- Compulsory licensing system (1)
- Conflicting judgments (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Contributory infringement (1)
- Copyright Clause (1)
- Copyright Code (1)
- Counterfeit (1)
- Court reporters (1)
- Design patent (1)
- Dignity (1)
- Disseminators (1)
- Equity courts (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Free production (1)
- Good will (1)
- Ingenuity (1)
- Innovation (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Privacy, Property, And Publicity, Mark A. Lemley
Privacy, Property, And Publicity, Mark A. Lemley
Michigan Law Review
Review of Jennifer E. Rothman's The Right of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined for a Public World.
Copyright's Communications Policy, Timothy Wu
Copyright's Communications Policy, Timothy Wu
Michigan Law Review
There is something for everyone to dislike about early twenty-first century copyright. Owners of content say that newer and better technologies have made it too easy to be a pirate. Easy copying, they say, threatens the basic incentive to create new works; new rights and remedies are needed to restore the balance. Academic critics instead complain that a growing copyright gives content owners dangerous levels of control over expressive works. In one version of this argument, this growth threatens the creativity and progress that copyright is supposed to foster; in another, it represents an "enclosure movement" that threatens basic freedoms …
The Nature Of Copyright: A Law Of Users' Rights, Lydia Pallas Loren
The Nature Of Copyright: A Law Of Users' Rights, Lydia Pallas Loren
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users' Rights by L. Ray Patterson and Stanley W. Lindberg
The Rise Of The Supreme Court Reporter: An Institutional Perspective On Marshall Court Ascendancy, Craig Joyce
The Rise Of The Supreme Court Reporter: An Institutional Perspective On Marshall Court Ascendancy, Craig Joyce
Michigan Law Review
This Article will first explore the antecedents to, and beginnings of, the reporter system under Alexander J. Dallas and William Cranch. Next, the Article will examine the transformation of the system under the Court's first official Reporter, the scholarly Henry Wheaton. Finally, the Article will recount the struggle between Wheaton and his more practical successor, Richard Peters, Jr., that culminated in 1834 in the Court's declaration that its decisions are the property of the people of the United States, and not of the Court's Reporters.
Borderland - Where Copyright And Design Patent Meet, Richard W. Pogue
Borderland - Where Copyright And Design Patent Meet, Richard W. Pogue
Michigan Law Review
Copyright law and design patent law contemplate basically different objects of protection. Yet at the outer fringes of these types of protection certain concepts overlap to form a rather undefined borderland in which it is difficult to say what law is applicable-copyright law, patent law, neither, or both. It is the purpose of this paper to explore this borderland area in the light of traditional copyright and patent law principles, with attention given to policy considerations involved, and to offer suggestions toward drawing a sharper boundary between the two.
Woe Unto You Trade-Mark Owners, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr.
Woe Unto You Trade-Mark Owners, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
THE new Trade-Mark Act,1 widely heralded as giving added protection to trade-mark owners, has in its nearly four years of operation resulted, in several spectacular instances, in narrowing the rights conferred by the registration and use of trade-marks. Text author Rudolph Callmann remarked after the act's first birthday: "Despite all the efforts of the bar, our courts still cling to the familiar anachronisms."2 Where do trade-mark owners stand today? The Supreme Court has to date failed to answer this question, and the federal courts have refused to consider the import of the new legislation. Many commentators, attorneys and scholars thought …
Definiteness And Particularity In Patent Claims, William Redin Woodward
Definiteness And Particularity In Patent Claims, William Redin Woodward
Michigan Law Review
To the uninitiated the professional jargon of patents, and particularly of patent claims, is somewhat mystifying even in the most ordinary cases. The profession likes to define the elements of apparatus as "means" for this, "means" for that and "means" for the other. Words like "plurality," "predetermined" and "comminuted" find remarkably frequent use by patent attorneys. And the habit of using out-of-the-way verbiage may lead the practitioner by force of habit to pass over a simple term like "sleeping car" in favor of a more elaborate phrase like "a communal vehicle for the dormitory accommodation of nocturnal viators." But it …
Recent Developments In Patent Law, Arthur M. Smith
Recent Developments In Patent Law, Arthur M. Smith
Michigan Law Review
The framers of the Federal Constitution shared with Thomas Jefferson his "wish to see new inventions encouraged, and old ones brought again info useful notice." Their concern for the public welfare caused many, including Jefferson, to question the wisdom of using a limited monopoly to encourage such inventions.
Fraudulent Intent In Trade Mark Cases, Grover C. Grismore
Fraudulent Intent In Trade Mark Cases, Grover C. Grismore
Michigan Law Review
One of the troublesome questions which confront the trade mark lawyer is that as to the extent to which a fraudulent intention is an essential element in trade mark litigation. Must a plaintiff who is seeking injunctive relief, or damages, or an accounting against a defendant who", it is alleged, has simulated his trade mark, trade name or other identifying device, show that the latter has consciously sought to mislead the purchasing public? Judges and legal writers leave the matter in doubt. It is the purpose of this paper to discover, if possible, how this doubt has arisen and to …
Ingenuity Of The Infringer And The Courts, Edward S. Rogers
Ingenuity Of The Infringer And The Courts, Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
The person who imitates a trademark has by common consent come to be described as a "pirate." At the time the designation was first applied, it was more or less appropriate. The pirate saw and coveted his neighbor's successful business, and like any MORGAN, TEACH, SHARKEY, or L'OLLONOIS, sighting a fat galleon laden with plate wallowing in the trade winds, homeward bound from the Indies, he laid himself alongside and took what he wanted. He counterfeited marks and labels as exactly as he could, not as he dared. There was no limit to his impudence. He was deterred only by …
Some Historical Matter Concerning Trade-Marks, Edward S. Rogers
Some Historical Matter Concerning Trade-Marks, Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
Most of the text books on the subject of trade marks begin with the case of Southern v. How, and either expressly assert, or by implicating convey the impression that trade marks are a comparatively modern thing, when, as a matter of fact few human institutions can boast a more respectable antiquity. The use of trade marks dates from the very earliest times of which we have any knowledge. The recent excavations in Asia Minor and in Egypt have revealed bricks bearing names which are supposed to be those of the manufacturers accompanied in many instances by devices. Roman bricks …
Some Historical Matter Concerning Literary Property, Edward S. Rogers
Some Historical Matter Concerning Literary Property, Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
The notion of property in published literary works was of gradual development. One may search in vain through classical literature and Roman law to find anything in the nature of copyright. Hearty condemnation of plagiarism is to be found. Stealing another man's labor and passing it off as one's own was a literary crime, but neither that nor open piracy seems to have been a matter of which the law took cognizance. Before the invention of printing, making manuscript copies of a book was such a laborious and time-consuming task that an ancient author must have felt sufficiently repaid if …