Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- New York Law School (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
-
- Liberty University (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- NYLS Law Review (5)
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Helms School of Government Undergraduate Law Review (1)
- IP Theory (1)
- Liberty University Journal of Statesmanship & Public Policy (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Rethinking Fairness: Principled Legal Realism And Federal Jurisdiction, Aviam Soifer
Rethinking Fairness: Principled Legal Realism And Federal Jurisdiction, Aviam Soifer
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jon Newman’S Theory Of Disparagement And The First Amendment In The Administrative State, Edward L. Rubin
Jon Newman’S Theory Of Disparagement And The First Amendment In The Administrative State, Edward L. Rubin
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doubting Thomas: Confirmation Veracity Meets Performance Reality, Joyce A. Baugh, Christopher E. Smith
Doubting Thomas: Confirmation Veracity Meets Performance Reality, Joyce A. Baugh, Christopher E. Smith
Seattle University Law Review
At the close of the United States Supreme Court's 1994 term, Justice Clarence Thomas became the center of news media attention for his important role as a prominent member of the Court's resurgent conservative bloc. More frequently than in past terms, Thomas's opinions articulated the conservative position for his fellow Justices. According to one report, "The newly energized Thomas has shown little hesitancy this term in leading the conservative charge. Another article referred to Thomas's "full-throated emergence as a distinctive and articulate judicial voice." Thomas's new prominence, assertiveness, and visibility have been attributed to his emergence from the shadows of …