Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (14)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (8)
- University of Richmond (4)
- SelectedWorks (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Macalester College (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (5)
- Judges (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Legal history (4)
- Chancery (3)
-
- Constitutional law (3)
- English law (3)
- General Law (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Administrative law (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Corporate law (2)
- Damages (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- History (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Juries (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal Analysis and Writing (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- SCOTUS (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- AVC test (1)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Samuel R. Olken (6)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles (3)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
-
- Thiago Luís Santos Sombra (2)
- Timothy P. O'Neill (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Emily L Sherwin (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Gerald Torres (1)
- Jaimie K. McFarlin (1)
- James R Maxeiner (1)
- Michael C. Dorf (1)
- Michael Heise (1)
- Political Science Honors Projects (1)
- Stuart Ford (1)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 41 of 41
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
What Should Restatement (Fourth) Say About Treaty Interpretation?, Jean Galbraith
What Should Restatement (Fourth) Say About Treaty Interpretation?, Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law took notably different approaches to treaty interpretation, reflecting intervening changes in the legal landscape. This symposium contribution identifies five developments in international and domestic law since Restatement (Third). It then considers their import for the forthcoming Restatement (Fourth). Most importantly, it argues that Restatement (Fourth) should fully incorporate two articles on treaty interpretation from the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties into its black-letter provisions. Since the time of Restatement (Third), these articles have become central to international practice on treaty interpretation, and the principles they set forth are …
Corporate Law Doctrine And The Legacy Of American Legal Realism, Edward B. Rock
Corporate Law Doctrine And The Legacy Of American Legal Realism, Edward B. Rock
All Faculty Scholarship
In this contribution to a symposium on "Legal Realism and Legal Doctrine," I examine the role that jurisprudence plays in corporate law doctrine. Through an examination of paired cases from the United States and United Kingdom, I offer a case study of the contrasting influence on corporate law judging of American Legal Realism versus traditional U.K. Doctrinalism.
Specialist judges in both systems, aided by specialist lawyers, clearly identify and understand the core policy issues involved in a dispute and arrive at sensible results. Adjusting for differences in background law and institutions, it seems likely that the disputes would ultimately be …
Inventing The Classical Constitution, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Inventing The Classical Constitution, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
One recurring call over a century of American constitutional thought is for return to a "classical" understanding of American federal and state Constitutions. "Classical" does not necessarily mean "originalist" or "interpretivist." Some classical views, such as the attempt to revitalize Lochner-style economic due process, find little support in the text of the federal Constitution or any of the contemporary state constitutions. Rather, constitutional meaning is thought to lie in a background link between constitution formation and classical statecraft. The core theory rests on the assumption of a social contract to which everyone in some initial position agreed. Like any contract, …
John Merefield's Common Pleas Reports, William Hamilton Bryson
John Merefield's Common Pleas Reports, William Hamilton Bryson
Law Faculty Publications
John Merefield of Crewkerne, Somerset, was admitted to the Inner Temple on 14 February 1612, and he was called to the bar on 15 October 1620. He gave readings in 1621 and 1641; on 4 November 1638, he was called to the bench. Merefield was created a serjeant in October 1660, and he died in October 1666.
Fourteen Cases From Herbert Jacob's Queen's Bench Reports, William Hamilton Bryson
Fourteen Cases From Herbert Jacob's Queen's Bench Reports, William Hamilton Bryson
Law Faculty Publications
Herbert Jacob was admitted to the Inner Temple on 3 June 1692, called to the bar on 28 June 1699, and called to the bench of the Inner Temple on 22 November 1721. He died in 1725.
Harvard Law School MS. 4081 [formerly MS. 2136] is a collection of Queen's Bench reports dating from 1702 to 1706. This manuscript consists of two books, which are attributed to Herbert Jacob, a barrister of the Inner Temple. The cases in volume one and volume two, ff. 1-71v, are the same reports as 2 Lord Raymond 755-1252, 92 E.R. 4-325. Volume two, ff. …
Thomas Bold's Chancery Reports, William Hamilton Bryson
Thomas Bold's Chancery Reports, William Hamilton Bryson
Law Faculty Publications
Thomas Bold was born in 1695, the son of William Bold of St. Bride's Parish, London. He entered Westminster School in 1708 and Christ Church, Oxford, on 23 June 1713. Bold received his B.A. in 1718 and an M.A. in 1721. He was admitted as a law student at the Middle Temple on 15 June 1711 and called to the bar on 31 May 1717. He was admitted ad eundem at Lincoln's Inn on 23 November 1717.
Unearthing The Lost History Of Seminole Rock, Amy J. Wildermuth, Sanne H. Knudsen
Unearthing The Lost History Of Seminole Rock, Amy J. Wildermuth, Sanne H. Knudsen
Articles
In 1945, the Supreme Court blessed a lesser known type of agency deference in Bowles v. Seminole Rock. Also known as Auer deference, it affords deference to agency interpretations of their own regulations. Courts regularly defer to agencies under this doctrine, regardless of where the interpretations first appear or how long-standing they are. Recently members of the Supreme Court have signaled a willingness to reconsider, and perhaps jettison, Seminole Rock. We agree. Seminole Rock has been widely accepted but surprisingly disconnected from any analysis of its origins and justifications. This Article — the first historical explication of Seminole …
From Chrysler And General Motors To Detroit, David A. Skeel Jr.
From Chrysler And General Motors To Detroit, David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
In the past five years, three of the most remarkable bankruptcy cases in American history have come out of Detroit: the bankruptcies of Chrysler and General Motors in 2009, and of Detroit itself in 2012. The principal objective of this Article is simply to show that the Grand Bargain at the heart of the Detroit bankruptcy is the direct offspring of the bankruptcy sale transactions that were used to restructure Chrysler and GM. The proponents of Detroit’s “Grand Bargain” never would have dreamed up the transaction were it not for the federal government-engineered carmaker bankruptcies. The Article’s second objective, based …
Marital Supremacy And The Constitution Of The Nonmarital Family, Serena Mayeri
Marital Supremacy And The Constitution Of The Nonmarital Family, Serena Mayeri
All Faculty Scholarship
Despite a transformative half century of social change, marital status still matters. The marriage equality movement has drawn attention to the many benefits conferred in law by marriage at a time when the “marriage gap” between affluent and poor Americans widens and rates of nonmarital childbearing soar. This Essay explores the contested history of marital supremacy—the legal privileging of marriage—through the lens of the “illegitimacy” cases of the 1960s and 1970s. Often remembered as a triumph for nonmarital families, these decisions defined the constitutional harm of illegitimacy classifications as the unjust punishment of innocent children for the “sins” of their …
Progressive Legal Thought, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Progressive Legal Thought, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
A widely accepted model of American legal history is that "classical" legal thought, which dominated much of the nineteenth century, was displaced by "progressive" legal thought, which survived through the New Deal and in some form to this day. Within its domain, this was a revolution nearly on a par with Copernicus or Newton. This paradigm has been adopted by both progressive liberals who defend this revolution and by classical liberals who lament it.
Classical legal thought is generally identified with efforts to systematize legal rules along lines that had become familiar in the natural sciences. This methodology involved not …
A Framework For Understanding Property Regulation And Land Use Control From A Dynamic Perspective, Donald J. Kochan