Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons^™

Hair Analysis As A Drug Detector, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Research in Brief

No abstract provided.

Resolution Of Prison Riots, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Research in Brief

No abstract provided.

Reducing Violent Crimes And Intentional Injuries, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs

No abstract provided.

Pre-Initial Hearing Detention: Are The Police Department And Social Services Intake Following The Law?, Henry A. Escoto

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Street Gangs And Drug Sales In Two Suburban Cities, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Research in Brief

No abstract provided.

The Americans With Disabilities Act And Criminal Justice: Mental Disabilities And Corrections, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs

No abstract provided.

Introduction, William S. Geimer, Scott E. Sundby

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Tuggle V. Netherland 1995 Wl 630932 (U.S.) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Barnes V. Thompson 58 F.3d 971 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Correll V. Thompson 63 F.3d 1279 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Fitzgerald V. Commonwealth 249 Va. 299, 455 S.E.2d 506 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Yeatts V. Murray 249 Va. 285, 455 S.E.2d 18 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

The Mandatory Arrest Law: Police Reaction, Kevin Walsh

Pace Law Review

The mandatory arrest requirement in certain domestic violence situations is unique, due to the fact that no other class of offense requires arrest. The Criminal Procedure Law states that a police officer "may arrest" for all other classes of offenses. The new subdivision states that a police officer "shall arrest a person, and shall not attempt to reconcile the parties or mediate .... ." The use of the word "shall," in contrast to "may," indicates obligation or necessity. Why has this class of offenses been singled out for mandatory arrest? What factors brought this mandatory arrest law about?

Kyles V. Whitley 115 S. Ct. 1555 (1995) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Tuggle V. Thompson 57 F.3d 1356 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Gray V. Thompson 58 F.3d 59 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Graham V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 79,459 S.E.2d 97 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Mickens V. Commonwealth 249 Va. 423, 457 S.E.2d 9 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Royal V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 110, 458 S.E.2d 575 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Chandler V. Commonwealth 249 Va. 270, 455 S.E.2d 219 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Virginia's New State Habeas: What Every Attorney Needs To Know, Gregory J. Weinig

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

The Public Safety Exception To Miranda: Analyzing Subjective Motivation, Marc Schuyler Reiner

Michigan Law Review

This Note argues, however, that the appropriate inquiry under Quarles is whether an actual and reasonable belief in an emergency motivated the interrogating officer. This Note proposes a two-prong test to facilitate this inquiry. The subjective motivation prong evaluates the officer's subjective motivation as revealed by objective factors: the. content of the officer's questions, when he asked them, and when the suspect received Miranda warnings. The objective reasonableness prong looks at the objective circumstances to determine the reasonableness of the officer's belief in an emergency.

Part I demonstrates that the Quarles opinion actually contemplates and requires analysis of the officer's …

The Public Safety Exception To Miranda: Analyzing Subjective Motivation, Marc Schuyler Reiner

Michigan Law Review

This Note argues, however, that the appropriate inquiry under Quarles is whether an actual and reasonable belief in an emergency motivated the interrogating officer. This Note proposes a two-prong test to facilitate this inquiry. The subjective motivation prong evaluates the officer's subjective motivation as revealed by objective factors: the. content of the officer's questions, when he asked them, and when the suspect received Miranda warnings. The objective reasonableness prong looks at the objective circumstances to determine the reasonableness of the officer's belief in an emergency.

Part I demonstrates that the Quarles opinion actually contemplates and requires analysis of the officer's …

Prosecuting Child Physical Abuse Cases: A Case Study In San Diego, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Research in Brief

No abstract provided.

The Case Against Section 1983 Immunity For Witnesses Who Conspire With A State Official To Present Perjured Testimony, Jennifer S. Zbytowski

Michigan Law Review

This Note argues that witnesses who conspire with a state official to present perjured testimony at a judicial proceeding should not have absolute immunity from a section 1983 suit for damages. Part I provides background information on section 1983 and explains why a witness-state conspiracy satisfies the requirements of a section 1983 cause of action. Part I also summarizes the Supreme Court's doctrinal approach to section 1983 immunity. Finally, Part I examines two Supreme Court cases which are relevant to the issue of immunity for witness conspirators: Briscoe v. LaHue, and Malley v. Briggs. Part II applies the …

National Assessment Program: 1994 Survey Results, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Research in Brief

No abstract provided.

Controlling Tuberculosis In Community Corrections, Us Department Of Justice

National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs

No abstract provided.

Improving Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Welsh S. White

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution by Craig M. Bradley

Chopping Miranda Down To Size, Michael Chertoff

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Confessions, Truth, and the Law by Joseph D. Grano

Burket V. Commonwealth 248 Va. 596,450 S.E.2d 124 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.