Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (55)
- Courts (23)
- Constitutional Law (16)
- Supreme Court of the United States (10)
- Law and Politics (9)
-
- Public Law and Legal Theory (9)
- Law and Society (8)
- Legal Education (8)
- Legal History (7)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Law and Philosophy (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Legal Writing and Research (3)
- Anthropology (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- University of San Diego (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Pace University (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
-
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- BLR (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Western New England University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Publications (11)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Cornell Law School J.D. Student Research Papers (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Pace International Law Review Online Companion (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory Papers (1)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Working Paper Series (1)
Articles 61 - 68 of 68
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
The Rehnquist Court, Statutory Interpretation, Inertial Burdens, And A Misleading Version Of Democracy, Jeffrey W. Stempel
The Rehnquist Court, Statutory Interpretation, Inertial Burdens, And A Misleading Version Of Democracy, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
No one theory or school of thought consistently dominates judicial application of statutes, but the basic methodology employed by courts seems well-established if not always well-defined. Most mainstream judges and lawyers faced with a statutory construction task will look at (although with varying emphasis) the text of the statute, the legislative history of the provision, the context of the enactment, evident congressional purpose, and applicable agency interpretations, often employing the canons of construction for assistance. Although orthodox judicial thought suggests that the judge's role is confined to discerning textual meaning or directives of the enacting legislature, courts also often examine …
Chief Justice Nemetz's Judicial Record: Judicial Decision-Making And Judicial Values, David S. Cohen
Chief Justice Nemetz's Judicial Record: Judicial Decision-Making And Judicial Values, David S. Cohen
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Much of Chief Justice Nemetz's life has been devoted to the public good and public service - to the betterment of society through law. Through his judgments and through his contribution to the administration of justice in British Columbia and Canada, he has brought the law closer to every one of us. Few of us can appreciate the degree of sacrifice and dedication to the public good which a life of judging requires. For all these reasons, and out of respect for the dedication of the judiciary, lawyers rarely discuss “judicial values" and particularly the values of a specific judge; …
A Government By Judges: An Historical Re-View, Michael Henry Davis
A Government By Judges: An Historical Re-View, Michael Henry Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In 1921, Edouard Lambert, a professor of law at Lyon specializing in comparative studies and founder of an Institute of Comparative Law there, published a book, Le Gouvernement des judges et la lutte contra la legislation sociale aux Etats-Unis, thus singlehandedly creating the phrase, a "government of judges", to denote a truly unconstrained system of judicial review which could not be limited even by constitutional amendment. The phrase quickly entered the parlance of French public law and even that of popular culture, deriving much of its force, no doubt, from the historical French aversion to a strong judiciary, eventually becoming …
The Judge, Marianne Wesson