Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (33)
- Law and Society (26)
- Health Law and Policy (25)
- Environmental Law (23)
- Immigration Law (23)
-
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (22)
- Military, War, and Peace (22)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (22)
- Courts (13)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Litigation (10)
- Judges (8)
- Supreme Court of the United States (8)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (22)
- UIC School of Law (13)
- University of Baltimore Law (9)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- New York Law School (4)
-
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (12)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (12)
- Inc. (6)
- Criminal law (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
-
- Discrimination (3)
- Due process (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Due Process Clause (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Freedom of speech (2)
- Interpretation (2)
- Jr. (2)
- Judicial (2)
- Judicial activism (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Race and law (2)
- Sanctions (2)
- State law (2)
- Student comment (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Symposia (2)
- Tribal sovereignty (2)
- United States (2)
- Washington v. Glucksberg (2)
- 12 U.S.C. §§ 3402-3403 (1)
- 18 U.S.C. § 1702 (1)
- 5K2.21 (1)
- A Compend of Lectures on the Aims and Duties of the Profession of the Law: Delivered Before the Law Class of the University of Pennsylvania (1)
- A Course of Legal Study (1)
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (22)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- University of Baltimore Law Review (9)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- NYLS Law Review (4)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- American Indian Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Montana Law Review (1)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
Articles 61 - 73 of 73
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Assault Upon The Citadel Of Privity: The Coexistence Of Strict, Privity And Belt V. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & (And) Tate, Inc. Comment., C. John Muller Iv
Assault Upon The Citadel Of Privity: The Coexistence Of Strict, Privity And Belt V. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & (And) Tate, Inc. Comment., C. John Muller Iv
St. Mary's Law Journal
The practicing attorney must have a complete understanding of legal malpractice liability. Managing this risk can be a precarious responsibility when the law is not clearly defined. This is compounded by the steady erosion of attorney-client privity barriers making it easier for third party non-clients to sue lawyers for legal malpractice. This is the current state of matters in Texas since the Texas Supreme Court decided Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc. on May 5, 2006. The Belt court determined personal representatives of an estate may bring a malpractice claim against the decedent’s attorneys. The Belt court was …
Reflections On James N. Castleberry, Jr., Dean (1978-1989), St. Mary's University School Of Law Tribute., Charles E. Cantu
Reflections On James N. Castleberry, Jr., Dean (1978-1989), St. Mary's University School Of Law Tribute., Charles E. Cantu
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
A Tribute To Ernest A. Raba, Dean (1946-1978), St. Mary's University School Of Law Tribute., Aloysius A. Leopold
A Tribute To Ernest A. Raba, Dean (1946-1978), St. Mary's University School Of Law Tribute., Aloysius A. Leopold
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Metes And Bounds Of Governmental Immunity And Political Subdivisions: Limiting Tort Liability For Municipal Utility Districts In Texas Recent Development., Dawn E. Norman
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
De-Moralized: Glucksberg In The Malaise, Steven D. Smith
De-Moralized: Glucksberg In The Malaise, Steven D. Smith
Michigan Law Review
Ten years down the road, what is the enduring significance of the "assisted suicide" cases, Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill? The cases reflect an unusually earnest, but nonetheless unsuccessful, attempt by the Supreme Court to grapple with a profound moral issue. So, why was the Court unable to provide a more satisfying justification for its conclusions? This Article, written for a symposium on the tenth anniversary of Glucksberg,, discusses that question. Part I examines some of the flaws in reasoning in the Glucksberg and Quill opinions and suggests that these flaws stem from the opinion writers' …
Terminating Maintenance Payments When An Ex-Spouse Cohabitates In Illinois: When Is Enough Enough?, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 435 (2008), Allan L. Karnes
Terminating Maintenance Payments When An Ex-Spouse Cohabitates In Illinois: When Is Enough Enough?, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 435 (2008), Allan L. Karnes
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Clear Initiative And Mental States: 1½ Problems Solved, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 701 (2008), Timothy P. O'Neill
The Clear Initiative And Mental States: 1½ Problems Solved, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 701 (2008), Timothy P. O'Neill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Presumptions, Inferences, And Strict Liability In Illinois Criminal Law: Preempting The Presumption Of Innocence?, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 715 (2008), Theodore A. Gottfried, Peter G. Baroni
Presumptions, Inferences, And Strict Liability In Illinois Criminal Law: Preempting The Presumption Of Innocence?, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 715 (2008), Theodore A. Gottfried, Peter G. Baroni
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Illinois Criminal Code Of 2009: Providing Clarity In The Law, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 815 (2008), Governor James R. Thompson, Justice Gino Divito, Peter G. Baroni, Kathy Saltmarsh, Daniel Mayerfeld
The Illinois Criminal Code Of 2009: Providing Clarity In The Law, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 815 (2008), Governor James R. Thompson, Justice Gino Divito, Peter G. Baroni, Kathy Saltmarsh, Daniel Mayerfeld
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nontestimonial Declarations Against Penal Interest: Eschewing The Corroboration Requirement For Inculpatory Statements, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 969 (2008), Michael Duffy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Case Note: Golden Gate Restaurant Association V. City And County Of San Francisco: Setting The Stage For Supreme Court Review Of The Most Important Preemption Matter In The History Of Erisa, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2008), Joshua Waldbeser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Baby Ka-Boom! Coming Developments In Erisa Litigation Due To Social, Demographic, And Financial Pressures From The Baby Boom Generation, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2008), Craig C. Martin, Matthew J. Renaud, Douglas A. Sondgeroth
Baby Ka-Boom! Coming Developments In Erisa Litigation Due To Social, Demographic, And Financial Pressures From The Baby Boom Generation, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2008), Craig C. Martin, Matthew J. Renaud, Douglas A. Sondgeroth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Limiting A Constitutional Tort Without Probably Cause: First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest After Hartman, Colin P. Watson
Limiting A Constitutional Tort Without Probably Cause: First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest After Hartman, Colin P. Watson
Michigan Law Review
Federal law provides a cause of action for individuals who are the target of adverse state action taken in retaliation for their exercise of First Amendment rights. Because these constitutional torts are "easy to allege and hard to disprove," they raise difficult questions concerning the proper balance between allowing meaningful access to the courts and protecting government agents from frivolous and vexatious litigation. In its recent decision in Hartman v. Moore, the U.S. Supreme Court tipped the scales in favor of the state in one subset of First Amendment retaliation actions by holding that plaintiffs in actions for retaliatory …