Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (13)
- Judges (8)
- Rule of Law (5)
- Legal History (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Legal Profession (3)
- Legal Writing and Research (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Keyword
-
- Appellate court (3)
- Judges (2)
- Judicial discretion (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Legal profession (2)
-
- Standard of review (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Unpublished opinions (2)
- Abuse of discretion (1)
- Access to appellate review (1)
- Accessibility of judicial opinions (1)
- Admission of evidence in appellate procedures (1)
- Alternatives (1)
- American law (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate discretion (1)
- Appellate procedure (1)
- Appellate process (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Appellate vs. common and civil law (1)
- Arkansas Federalism (1)
- Arkansas civil rights (1)
- Branches of government (1)
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc (1)
- Capital punishment delays (1)
- Case briefs (1)
- Case citations in federal appellate opinions (1)
- Changes in media (1)
- Citation provenance (1)
- Citation stickiness (1)
Articles 1 - 25 of 25
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Citation Stickiness, Kevin Bennardo, Alexa Z. Chew
Citation Stickiness, Kevin Bennardo, Alexa Z. Chew
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This Article is an empirical study of what we call citation stickiness. A citation is sticky if it appears in one of the parties' briefs and then again in the court's opinion. Imagine that the parties use their briefs to toss citations in the court's direction. Some of those citations stick and appear in the opinion—these are the sticky citations. Some of those citations don't stick and go unmentioned by the court—these are the unsticky ones. Finally, some sources were never mentioned by the parties yet appear in the court's opinion. These authorities are endogenous—they spring from the court itself. …
Pothole Laws, Appellate Courts, And Judicial Drift, Kenneth L. Gartner
Pothole Laws, Appellate Courts, And Judicial Drift, Kenneth L. Gartner
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This article begins by describing the structure of the appellate system in New York state, introducing the features of the typical New York pothole law, and summarizing the New York cases that set the substantive and procedural background for a discussion and analysis of judicial drift.
The Right To Appeal In Comparative Perspective, Dražan Djukić
The Right To Appeal In Comparative Perspective, Dražan Djukić
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Appellate procedures regarding the most serious crimes under domestic law are, in general, conducted differently in common law and civil law systems. This article reviews the differences concerning the primary facets of such proceedings, namely prosecutorial rights of appeal, access to appellate review, the scope of appellate review, the admission of additional evidence, appellate decisionmaking powers, and the functions of appellate review. It then explains that these differences result from dissimilar decisionmaking processes, degrees of adherence to the search for the truth, and sources of law.
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Creating Kairos At The Supreme Court: Shelby County, Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, And The Judicial Construction Of Right Moments, Linda L. Berger
Creating Kairos At The Supreme Court: Shelby County, Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, And The Judicial Construction Of Right Moments, Linda L. Berger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Slow Wheels Of Furman's Machinery Of Death, Brent E. Newton
The Slow Wheels Of Furman's Machinery Of Death, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Judicial Declaration Of Public Policy, Ruggero J. Aldisert
Judicial Declaration Of Public Policy, Ruggero J. Aldisert
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Precedent In The Federal Courts Of Appeals: An Endangered Or Invasive Species?, John B. Oakley
Precedent In The Federal Courts Of Appeals: An Endangered Or Invasive Species?, John B. Oakley
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
All Mixed Up About Mixed Questions, Randall H. Warner
All Mixed Up About Mixed Questions, Randall H. Warner
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
No-Citation Rules Under Siege: A Battlefield Report And Analysis, Stephen R. Barnett
No-Citation Rules Under Siege: A Battlefield Report And Analysis, Stephen R. Barnett
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Few Thoughts On The Importance Of An Independent Judiciary, Robert E. Hirshon
A Few Thoughts On The Importance Of An Independent Judiciary, Robert E. Hirshon
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
From Pens To Pixels: Text-Media Issues In Promulgating, Archiving, And Using Judicial Opinions, Kenneth H. Ryesky
From Pens To Pixels: Text-Media Issues In Promulgating, Archiving, And Using Judicial Opinions, Kenneth H. Ryesky
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Expanded Rights Through State Law: The United States Supreme Court Shows State Courts The Way, Robert L. Brown
Expanded Rights Through State Law: The United States Supreme Court Shows State Courts The Way, Robert L. Brown
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Petitions for en banc rehearings are rarely granted. A Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit provides a history and reasoning of the rehearing process and his personal observations on those petitions and processes in today's court.
Constitutional Revolutions: A New Look At Lower Appellate Review In American Constitutionalism, Robert Justin Lipkin
Constitutional Revolutions: A New Look At Lower Appellate Review In American Constitutionalism, Robert Justin Lipkin
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Judicial review allows the Supreme Court of the United States to perform revolutionary constitutional change. The United States Courts of Appeals could also be a vehicle for revolutionary constitutional adjudication.
The Power Of A Federal Appellate Court To Direct Entry Of Judgment As A Matter Of Law: Reflections On Weisgram V. Marley Co., Robert A. Ragazzo
The Power Of A Federal Appellate Court To Direct Entry Of Judgment As A Matter Of Law: Reflections On Weisgram V. Marley Co., Robert A. Ragazzo
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Federal district court judges have several mechanisms for controlling civil jury functions. One mechanism is the entry of judgment as a matter of law. Federal appellate courts are able to reverse and direct entry of judgment as a matter of law. This article examines the appropriateness of such authority.
Conscience, Judging, And Conscientious Judging, Gene E. Franchini
Conscience, Judging, And Conscientious Judging, Gene E. Franchini
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Judging requires applying the law instead of personal morals, philosophy, or policy of the community. Doing so requires a respect for the separation of powers between branches of government. Justice Franchini of the New Mexico Supreme Court reflects on this challenge for judges through a personal anecdote.
Standards Of Review: Judicial Review Of Discretionary Decisionmaking, Martha S. Davis
Standards Of Review: Judicial Review Of Discretionary Decisionmaking, Martha S. Davis
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The applicable standard of review determines how much deference an appellate court gives a lower court’s decision. Discretionary decisions are review under the “abuse of discretion” standard where the process the lower court used to reach its decision is scrutinized. Three scholars attempts to define this standard are first analyzed followed by cases that have molded the standard. Advice to practitioners concludes the article.
Discretionary Appellate Review Of Non-Final Orders: It’S Time To Change The Rules, Howard B. Eisenberg, Alan B. Morrison
Discretionary Appellate Review Of Non-Final Orders: It’S Time To Change The Rules, Howard B. Eisenberg, Alan B. Morrison
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This article discusses the uncertainty of United States Courts of Appeals jurisdiction over non-final orders.
The Law And The Brain: Judging Scientific Evidence Of Intent, Erica Beecher-Monas, Edgar Garcia-Rill
The Law And The Brain: Judging Scientific Evidence Of Intent, Erica Beecher-Monas, Edgar Garcia-Rill
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This essay addresses the issue of judges deciding what scientific evidence is admissible. The primary focus is the admissibility of expert mental state testimony in criminal cases. The issue is addressed by answering two questions: 1) how does science work and 2) how does the brain work?
Unpublished Opinions: A Comment, Richard S. Arnold
Unpublished Opinions: A Comment, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The Honorable Richard S. Arnold gives a federal appellate judge’s perspective of the unpublished opinions debate.
An Argument On The Record For More Federal Judgeships, William M. Richman
An Argument On The Record For More Federal Judgeships, William M. Richman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
A case is made for increasing the number of federal judges. The author uses the loss of judge involvement in decisionmaking to begin his argument. The discussion then addresses the arguments against increasing federal judgeships.