Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Chevron (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Concepts of Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Contract law (1)
-
- Contract rights (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Death Row (1)
- Dodd-Frank Act (1)
- EPA (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Government contract (1)
- HLA Hart (1)
- Judicial Interpretation (1)
- LGBTQA (1)
- Law dialectic (1)
- Legal positivism (1)
- Municipalities as persons (1)
- Natural law (1)
- Philosophy of law (1)
- Public employment contract (1)
- Section 1983 (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
- Stare Decisis (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Transgender (1)
- Under color of law (1)
- Uniform Commercial Code (1)
- Whistleblowers (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Leviathan Goes To Washington: How To Assert The Separation Of Powers In Defense Of Future Generations
Florida A & M University Law Review
The separation of powers was originally drawn from the common law of England, vindicated during the American Revolution as a fundamental bulwark against tyranny, and constitutionalized in the first three articles of the U.S. Constitution. It was adopted as an assurance that the present generation would not assert dead-hand control over the future of American society for mere efficiency, vanity, or greed. The separation of powers, therefore, exists to empower future generations to contend for their rights of life, liberty, and property. Both the long history of the separation of powers and the recent, controversial practices of multinational government contractors …
Stare Decisis On Death Row: How The Florida Supreme Court Has Abandoned Stare Decisis Since 2020
Stare Decisis On Death Row: How The Florida Supreme Court Has Abandoned Stare Decisis Since 2020
Florida A & M University Law Review
This comment will analyze how the Florida Supreme Court has disregarded the doctrine of Stare Decisis throughout 2020 and the consequences of the four significant changes to Florida’s death penalty law. Part II discusses how the doctrine of stare decisis is defined and its origins. Part III addresses the need for certainty and reliability of the law for its survival as an institution. Part IV discusses how the court’s new composition has led the court to overturn precedent in death penalty law. Part V delves into the four major changes that the Florida Supreme Court has made relating to the …
Is The United States Judicial System Failing Transgender Women? A Critical Overview, Taylor J. House
Is The United States Judicial System Failing Transgender Women? A Critical Overview, Taylor J. House
Florida A & M University Law Review
This paper will discuss the rise of the transgender civil rights movement, the problems in the judicial system, and the rights that should be afforded to transgender women. In part one, I will address the LGBTQA civil rights movement led by transgender women. In part two, I will address the transphobia in the prison system. In part three, I will address the lack of visibility of black transgender issues in the current black civil rights movement. In the fourth part, I will address whether there should be certain fundamental rights given to transgender women. In the fifth part of this …
Whistle While You Work: Interpreting Retaliation Remedies Available To Whistleblowers In The Dodd-Frank Act, Max Birmingham
Whistle While You Work: Interpreting Retaliation Remedies Available To Whistleblowers In The Dodd-Frank Act, Max Birmingham
Florida A & M University Law Review
This Article asserts that judicial activism occurs when a court goes beyond the plain meaning of the text that is plain and unambiguous, to promulgate its politics. This Article does not make the argument nor infer that this is the sole definition of judicial activism. Rather, this Article is narrowing the scope by enumerating a specific act that falls within the category of judicial activism.
This argument proceeds as follows. Part I provides context of judicial activism. Part II analyzes how various courts have interpreted the statute, and whether the interpretation is consistent with canons of construction. Part III assesses …
From Gorsuch To Gorsuch: Family Reformation On Agency Power, Matthew Noxsel
From Gorsuch To Gorsuch: Family Reformation On Agency Power, Matthew Noxsel
Florida A & M University Law Review
Although Chevron has drawn extensive scholarship examining its doctrinal origins,17 evolution,18 and impact,19 this is not one of those inquiries. Instead, this Comment seeks to address some of the circumstances and rationale motivating certain people behind Chevron, and therefore the doctrine and its impact will be discussed in short form. Accordingly, Part II of this Comment will use Anne Gorsuch’s service at the EPA as a lens through which to view the conservative revolution that occurred before and during the Reagan years, with an eye toward a subtle change in thinking from previous generations regarding agency regulations. Part III of …
Liberty Over Death: Seeking Due Process Dimensions For Freedom Of Contract, Michael Pillow
Liberty Over Death: Seeking Due Process Dimensions For Freedom Of Contract, Michael Pillow
Florida A & M University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Foundations Of Section 1983 Jurisprudence: A Look From The Concept Of Law, Timothy I. Oppelt
The Foundations Of Section 1983 Jurisprudence: A Look From The Concept Of Law, Timothy I. Oppelt
Florida A & M University Law Review
This article uses the theories of H.L.A. Hart to provide an interpretive framework for a vital civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Any interpretation of Sec. 1983 requires some sense of the fundamental nature of law and the ability to identify legal rules. Specifically, this article examines the "under color of" language of Sec. 1983 and the statute's application to municipalities. It is possible that these areas remain partially in flux or undeveloped because the Court lacks an interpretation of the statute that accounts for how rules can confer power, create artificial persons, delegate the ability to act with …