Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (6)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Courts (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law and Philosophy (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- European Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- International Humanitarian Law (2)
- Law and Psychology (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (2)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Immigration (2)
- 2016 presidential election (1)
- American Convention (1)
-
- Briggs (1)
- Briggs v. Brown (1)
- Britain (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- Chemerinsky (1)
- Citizenship and Immigration Services (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Dicta (1)
- Dimaya (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Forced Disappearance (1)
- Governance (1)
- Grand juries (1)
- Grand jury (1)
- Home Office (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- ICC (1)
- INA (1)
- INS (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (1)
- Inter American Commission of Human Rights (1)
- Inter American Court of Human Rights (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Preemptive Dicta: The Problem Created By Judicial Efficiency, Judith M. Stinson
Preemptive Dicta: The Problem Created By Judicial Efficiency, Judith M. Stinson
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Judges regularly espouse dicta. Traditional obiter dicta, remarks that are clearly asides and not about issues considered in the case, can be easily ignored by subsequent courts. But one particular form of dicta is especially problematic because it is more difficult to ignore. Judicial efficiency dicta are statements in judicial opinions about issues involved in the case and likely to present themselves again, but not necessary for the outcome of the case. While those statements are often about issues actually considered and may contribute to judicial efficiency by saving courts time when reconsidering issues already litigated, just like obiter dicta, …
The Need For A Historical Exception To Grand Jury Secrecy In The Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Daniel Aronsohn
The Need For A Historical Exception To Grand Jury Secrecy In The Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Daniel Aronsohn
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Making Constitutional Sense: A Modal Approach To California's Proposition 66, Alan Romero
Making Constitutional Sense: A Modal Approach To California's Proposition 66, Alan Romero
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
For years, the California Supreme Court has adopted a deferential posture when reviewing state constitutional challenges to a ballot initiative. The decision in Briggs v. Brown underscored the degree to which courts are willing to avoid striking down ballot initiatives on constitutional grounds, such as by broadly construing the initiative’s language to avoid constitutional problems. In construing the language of Proposition 66 to avoid separation of powers problems, however, Briggs effectively re-interpreted central pillars of Proposition 66 in ways rendering it unrecognizable to Californians who cast votes for and against the initiative. Such recasting of ballot initiatives raises fundamental jurisprudential …
Experiments With Suppression: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In Britain In The Revolutionary Period, Christopher M. Roberts
Experiments With Suppression: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In Britain In The Revolutionary Period, Christopher M. Roberts
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
This article is concerned with the structure of repressive governance, and how it has evolved historically. It examines this theme through an exploration of the manner which repressive laws and institutions evolved in Britain over the course of the late eighteenth century. In particular, it reviews the various measures that British authorities utilized and relied upon in order to confront a growing wave of calls for social and political reforms. These included a policy of aggressive prosecutions of dissidents; the creation of new institutions such as the Home Office designed to enhance the powers of the central authorities; extralegal measures …
Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention, Stuart Ford
Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention, Stuart Ford
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
Despite significant optimism about the future of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) during its early years, recently there has been growing criticism of it by both scholars and governments. As a result, there appears to be more doubt about the ICC’s ability to succeed now than at any other point in its history. So, are the critics correct? Is the ICC failing? No. This Article argues that, not only can the ICC succeed, there is strong evidence that it is already succeeding. It analyzes several recent empirical articles that have convincingly demonstrated that the ICC prevents serious violations of international …
Legislating Morality: Moral Theory And Turpitudinous Crimes In Immigration Jurisprudence, Abel Rodríguez, Jennifer A. Bulcock
Legislating Morality: Moral Theory And Turpitudinous Crimes In Immigration Jurisprudence, Abel Rodríguez, Jennifer A. Bulcock
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Congress could have framed the country’s immigration policies in any number of ways. In significant part, it opted to frame them in moral terms. The crime involving moral turpitude is among the most pervasive and pernicious classifications in immigration law. In the Immigration and Nationality Act, it is virtually ubiquitous, appearing everywhere from the deportability and mandatory detention grounds to the inadmissibility and naturalization grounds. In effect, it acts as a gatekeeper for those who wish to enter and remain in the country, obtain lawful permanent residence, travel abroad after admission, or become United States citizens. With limited exceptions, noncitizens …
Flor Freire V. Ecuador, Raymond Chavez
Flor Freire V. Ecuador, Raymond Chavez
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
This case is about the discharge from duty of a Second Lieutenant of the Ecuadorian army who had been accused of engaging in homosexual conduct. The Court found violation of several articles of the American Convention. The violation of the prohibition of discrimination is the most significant one.
Murphy V. Ncaa: The Supreme Court's Latest Advance In Chemerinsky's "Federalism Revolution", Jonathan O. Ballard Jr.
Murphy V. Ncaa: The Supreme Court's Latest Advance In Chemerinsky's "Federalism Revolution", Jonathan O. Ballard Jr.
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Obscured Boundaries: Dimaya's Expansion Of The Void-For-Vagueness Doctrine, Katherine Brosamle
Obscured Boundaries: Dimaya's Expansion Of The Void-For-Vagueness Doctrine, Katherine Brosamle
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Criminal Procedure In Winter, Daniel Epps
Foreword: Criminal Procedure In Winter, Daniel Epps
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.