Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (39)
- Seattle University School of Law (33)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Duquesne University (3)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- DePaul University (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (10)
- Dobbs (3)
- History (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law (3)
-
- Washington (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Business Competition (2)
- Civil liberties (2)
- Courts (2)
- Debt (2)
- Investment (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Originalism (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Scalia (2)
- Technology (2)
- Tort (2)
- #MeToo (1)
- 1960s (1)
- 303 Creative (1)
- 3D Printing (1)
- AI (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Accelerating (1)
- Acceleration (1)
- Acceleration business operations services (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Admissions (1)
- Adult (1)
- Publication
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (39)
- Seattle University Law Review (33)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Duquesne Law Review (2)
- FIU Law Review (2)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Liberty University Journal of Statesmanship & Public Policy (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (1)
- Pace Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Theses and Dissertations (1)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (1)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 102 of 102
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The World Moved On Without Me: Redefining Contraband In A Technology-Driven World For Youth Detained In Washington State, Stephanie A. Lowry
The World Moved On Without Me: Redefining Contraband In A Technology-Driven World For Youth Detained In Washington State, Stephanie A. Lowry
Seattle University Law Review
If you ask a teenager in the United States to show you one of their favorite memories, they will likely show you a picture or video on their cell phone. This is because Americans, especially teenagers, love cell phones. Ninety-seven percent of all Americans own a cell phone according to a continuously updated survey by the Pew Research Center. For teenagers aged thirteen to seventeen, the number is roughly 95%. For eighteen to twenty-nine-year-olds, the number grows to 100%. On average, eight to twelve-year-old’s use roughly five and a half hours of screen media per day, in comparison to thirteen …
Let The Right Ones In: The Supreme Court's Changing Approach To Justiciability, Richard L. Heppner Jr.
Let The Right Ones In: The Supreme Court's Changing Approach To Justiciability, Richard L. Heppner Jr.
Duquesne Law Review
In last term's blockbuster case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, one of the considerations Justice Alito cited for overturning Roe and Casey was that they "have led to the distortion of many important but unrelated legal doctrines."1 Alito asserted that abortion jurisprudence has, among other things, "ignored the Court's third-party standing doctrine."2 Whether that is a fair description of the case law is debatable. But it raises the question of whether the newly ascendant conservative majority might likewise distort standing doctrine, and other justiciability doctrines, in order to decide particular, controversial issues.
Applying Bentham's Theory Of Fallacies To Chief Justice Robert's Reasoning In West Virginia V. Epa, Dana Neacsu
Applying Bentham's Theory Of Fallacies To Chief Justice Robert's Reasoning In West Virginia V. Epa, Dana Neacsu
Duquesne Law Review
There are two issues in West Virginia v. EPA.1 One regards justiciability, and the other delegation. Article III of the Federal Constitution limits justiciability to controversies, to disputes involving an injured party whose harm the judiciary believes it can remedy. The Constitution is silent on delegation.
This Essay summarizes the Court's decision in West Virginia v. EPA.2 It also analyzes Chief Justice Roberts' reasoning and addresses the case's flaws from two perspectives. It references the Court's decision connecting it to the so-called New Deal Cases,3 because in both Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan,4 …
The Child Vanishes: Justice Scalia's Approach To The Role Of Psychology In Determining Children's Rights And Responsibilities, Aviva Orenstein
The Child Vanishes: Justice Scalia's Approach To The Role Of Psychology In Determining Children's Rights And Responsibilities, Aviva Orenstein
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This Article explores how Justice Antonin Scalia’s hostility to psychology, antipathy to granting children autonomous rights, and dismissiveness of children’s interior lives both affected his jurisprudence and was a natural outgrowth of it. Justice Scalia expressed a skeptical, one might even say hostile, attitude towards psychology and its practitioners. Justice Scalia’s cynicism about the discipline and the therapists who practice it is particularly interesting regarding legal and policy arguments concerning children. His love of tradition and his rigid and unempathetic approach to children clash with modern notions of child psychology. Justice Scalia’s attitude towards psychology helps to explain his jurisprudence, …
Corporate Governance And Gender Equality: A Study Of Comply-Or-Explain Disclosure Regulation, Aaron A. Dhir, Sarah Kaplan, Maria Arabella Robles
Corporate Governance And Gender Equality: A Study Of Comply-Or-Explain Disclosure Regulation, Aaron A. Dhir, Sarah Kaplan, Maria Arabella Robles
Seattle University Law Review
In 2020, the Nasdaq Stock Market filed a proposal with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission seeking permission to adopt a board diversity-related disclosure requirement for its listed companies. In 2021, the SEC approved the proposal, thus entrenching Nasdaq’s position as the most significant stock exchange to date to mandate listing rules that reflect the intention of diversifying corporate boardrooms. Nasdaq’s movement into the diversity space is not the first attempt to address homogeneous boards in the U.S. In 2009, the SEC adopted a rule requiring publicly traded firms to report on whether they consider diversity in identifying director nominees. …
America’S Hidden Citizens: The Untold Stories Of The Unconscionable Deportations Of Its International Adoptees, Halley Cody
America’S Hidden Citizens: The Untold Stories Of The Unconscionable Deportations Of Its International Adoptees, Halley Cody
Seattle University Law Review
This Note addresses how the U.S. should rectify the harms it has perpetrated on non-citizen adoptees by amending the current deportation statutes to prevent their deportation. Part I addresses the history of adoption in the U.S. and related effects on immigration law. Part II highlights the stories of Adam Crapser and Philip Clay, who were adopted by American families who failed to naturalize them as minors, and who were subsequently deported after they sustained criminal records. Part III examines the policy goals behind deportation as a consequence of criminal convictions, as well as remedies instituted to prevent unwarranted deportation and …
You'll Grow Into It: How Federal And State Courts Have Erred In Excluding Persons Under Twenty-One From 'The People' Protected By The Second Amendment, Ryder Gaenz
FIU Law Review
After more than two centuries of jurisprudential stillness, the United States Supreme Court undertook the task of discerning the Second Amendment’s meaning in District of Columbia v. Heller, holding that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to self-defense. Since Heller, the lower courts have grappled with determining the scope of the Second Amendment. One question of scope—the subject of this piece—is at what age does a person come within the scope of the Second Amendment’s protections? Some federal and state courts have suggested, and in some cases held, that persons under twenty-one do not enjoy Second Amendment rights. However, …
Rooted: Metaphors And Judicial Philosophy In Artis V. District Of Columbia, Richard L. Heppner Jr.
Rooted: Metaphors And Judicial Philosophy In Artis V. District Of Columbia, Richard L. Heppner Jr.
Law Faculty Publications
This article examines how the metaphors in judicial opinions reveal judicial theories of lawmaking and judicial philosophies, through a close reading of Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion and Justice Gorsuch’s dissenting opinion in the Artis v. District of Columbia, 138 S. Ct. 594 (2018).
Artis was about what the phrase “shall be tolled” means in the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. §1367. Does a state-law claim’s statute of limitations pause or continue to run while the claim is in federal court? In holding that Congress used “stop the clock” tolling, an “off-the-shelf” legal device that pauses statute of limitations, …
Judicial Ethics And The Eradication Of Racism, Dontay Proctor-Mills
Judicial Ethics And The Eradication Of Racism, Dontay Proctor-Mills
Seattle University Law Review
In 2020, the Washington Supreme Court entrusted the legal community with working to eradicate racism from its legal system. Soon after, Washington’s Commission on Judicial Conduct (hereinafter the Commission) received a complaint about a bus ad for North Seattle College featuring King County Superior Court Judge David Keenan. Along with a photo of Judge Keenan’s face, the ad included the following language: “A Superior Court Judge, David Keenan got into law in part to advocate for marginalized communities. David’s changing the world. He started at North.” The Commission admonished Judge Keenan for violating the Code of Judicial Conduct, in part …
Alexander Hamilton And Administrative Law: How America’S First Great Public Administrator Informs And Challenges Our Understanding Of Contemporary Administrative Law, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
Alexander Hamilton’s recognition and reputation have soared since the premiere of “Hamilton,” Lin-Manuel Miranda’s musical about him in 2015. For lawyers, Hamilton’s work on the Federalist Papers and service as the nation’s first Treasury Secretary likely stand out more than other aspects of his extraordinary life. Politics and economics were fundamental concerns addressed by the Framers in a number of ways, including what we now refer to as administrative law—the laws and procedures that guide government departments (or, as we say today, agencies). Indeed, “Hamilton” reminds us that questions of administration and administrative law have been with us since the …
Judicial Deference To Agency Action Based On Ai, Cade Mallett
Judicial Deference To Agency Action Based On Ai, Cade Mallett
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Issue Three, Paul W. Kucinski
Introduction To Issue Three, Paul W. Kucinski
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.