Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (134)
- Supreme Court of the United States (104)
- State and Local Government Law (76)
- Constitutional Law (55)
- Law and Politics (35)
-
- Law and Society (35)
- Legal History (35)
- Jurisprudence (31)
- Criminal Law (28)
- Jurisdiction (26)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (26)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (24)
- Administrative Law (23)
- Criminal Procedure (23)
- Legal Profession (22)
- Litigation (22)
- Civil Procedure (21)
- Legislation (18)
- Law and Gender (17)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (16)
- Legal Education (15)
- Legal Writing and Research (15)
- Arts and Humanities (14)
- International Law (14)
- Rule of Law (14)
- Housing Law (12)
- Civil Law (11)
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (57)
- Selected Works (44)
- UC Law SF (18)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
-
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- Duke Law (7)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (7)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Pace University (5)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- Southern Methodist University (4)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (4)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- Marquette University Law School (3)
- Mercer University School of Law (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (32)
- Supreme Court (14)
- Constitutional law (12)
- Court (11)
- United States Supreme Court (11)
-
- Courts (10)
- Supreme court (10)
- Constitution (9)
- Judicial Process (9)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Law (7)
- New york (7)
- United States (7)
- Civil procedure (6)
- Criminal law (6)
- Evidence (6)
- Federal (6)
- Judge (6)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- State (6)
- Appellate (5)
- Due process (5)
- Judicial (5)
- Judicial Power (5)
- Judicial Selection (5)
- Judicial process (5)
- Judiciary (5)
- Legal history (5)
- Supreme Court Justices (5)
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (50)
- Faculty Scholarship (18)
- The Judges' Book (18)
- Articles (10)
- Neal E. Devins (10)
-
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl (7)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (6)
- Arkansas Law Review (5)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- Arbitration Brief (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Law Student Publications (3)
- Marquette Law Review (3)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (3)
- Notre Dame Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Tara L. Grove (3)
- Allison Orr Larsen (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Child and Family Law Journal (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 311
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Your Honor, On Social Media: The Judicial Ethics Of Bots And Bubbles, Katrina Lee
Your Honor, On Social Media: The Judicial Ethics Of Bots And Bubbles, Katrina Lee
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Simplified Courts Can't Solve Inequality, Colleen F. Shanahan, Anna E. Carpenter
Simplified Courts Can't Solve Inequality, Colleen F. Shanahan, Anna E. Carpenter
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
State civil courts struggle to handle the volume of cases before them. Litigants in these courts, most of whom are unrepresented, struggle to navigate the courts to solve their problems. This access-to-justice crisis has led to a range of reform efforts and solutions. One type of reform, court simplification, strives to reduce the complexity of procedures and information used by courts to help unrepresented litigants navigate the judicial system. These reforms mitigate but do not solve the symptoms of the larger underlying problem: state civil courts are struggling because they have been stuck with legal cases that arise from the …
Our Administered Constitution: Administrative Constitutionalism From The Founding To The Present, Sophia Z. Lee
Our Administered Constitution: Administrative Constitutionalism From The Founding To The Present, Sophia Z. Lee
All Faculty Scholarship
This article argues that administrative agencies have been primary interpreters and implementers of the federal Constitution throughout the history of the United States, although the scale and scope of this "administrative constitutionalism" has changed significantly over time as the balance of opportunities and constraints has shifted. Courts have nonetheless cast an increasingly long shadow over the administered Constitution. In part, this is because of the well-known expansion of judicial review in the 20th century. But the shift has as much to do with changes in the legal profession, legal theory, and lawyers’ roles in agency administration. The result is that …
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
James Gardner
Evidence marshaled in a new article by Jonathan Marshfield suggests strongly that unlike judges of U.S. federal courts, judges of American state supreme courts both recognize and embrace their role as active participants in the process of indirect popular self-rule. Consequently, they much more willingly serve as active and self-conscious vectors of governance. This is not to say that state judges lack appropriate judicial humility; it is to say merely that they possess a different and more nuanced understanding of the role of courts in American government than some of their federal counterparts.
Dignity And Civility, Reconsidered, Leah Litman
Dignity And Civility, Reconsidered, Leah Litman
Articles
People often talk about the Chief Justice, Justice Kagan, and Justice Breyer as the institutionalists on the modern Supreme Court. And that’s true, they are. Those Justices care about the Court as an institution and the Court’s reputation. They do not want people to look at the Court as a set of politicians in robes; and they do not want people to see judges as having ideological or partisan agendas. That is how they think of themselves, and they are willing to make compromises to maintain that image of the Court, and to set aside their personal beliefs in order …
Stacking In Criminal Procedure Adjudication;Symposium On Criminal Procedure: Judicial Proceedings, Luke M. Milligan
Stacking In Criminal Procedure Adjudication;Symposium On Criminal Procedure: Judicial Proceedings, Luke M. Milligan
Luke Milligan
The institutionalist branch of "Law and Courts" studies how judges incorporate institutional constraints into their decision-making processes. Congressional constraints on judicial review, as the literature currently stands, fall into one of two general classes: overrides and Court-curbing measures. This taxonomy, however, is incomplete. Neither overrides nor curbing measures are needed to explain the not uncommon situation where a policy-oriented Justice deviates from a preferred vote based on the belief that such a vote will prompt Congress to alter an "insulated base rule" in a way that disrupts the Justice's larger policy agenda. An "insulated base rule" is a Congressional policy …
Filling The Ninth Circuit Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Filling The Ninth Circuit Vacancies, Carl Tobias
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Upon Republican President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit experienced some pressing appellate vacancies, which the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO) carefully identified as “judicial emergencies” because the tribunal resolves a massive docket. Last year’s death of the iconic liberal champion Stephen Reinhardt and the late 2017 departure of libertarian former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski—who both assumed pivotal circuit leadership roles over numerous years—and a few of their colleagues’ decision to leave active court service thereafter, mean the tribunal presently confronts four judicial emergencies and resolves most slowly the largest …
Justice Begins Before Trial: How To Nudge Inaccurate Pretrial Rulings Using Behavioral Law And Economic Theory And Uniform Commercial Laws, Michael Gentithes
Justice Begins Before Trial: How To Nudge Inaccurate Pretrial Rulings Using Behavioral Law And Economic Theory And Uniform Commercial Laws, Michael Gentithes
William & Mary Law Review
Injustice in criminal cases often takes root before trial begins. Overworked criminal judges must resolve difficult pretrial evidentiary issues that determine the charges the State will take to trial and the range of sentences the defendant will face. Wrong decisions on these issues often lead to wrongful convictions. As behavioral law and economic theory suggests, judges who are cognitively busy and receive little feedback on these topics from appellate courts rely upon intuition, rather than deliberative reasoning, to resolve these questions. This leads to inconsistent rulings, which prosecutors exploit to expand the scope of evidentiary exceptions that almost always disfavor …
To Bail Or Not To Bail: Protecting The Presumption Of Innocence In Nevada, Ebeth Palafox, Brendan Mcleod
To Bail Or Not To Bail: Protecting The Presumption Of Innocence In Nevada, Ebeth Palafox, Brendan Mcleod
Nevada Law Journal Forum
This white paper aims to discuss the issues associated with bail reform in Nevada, provide an analysis of bail reform efforts across the country, and purpose possible solutions for obstacles to bail reform in Nevada. The white paper’s proposed recommendations for practical bail reform is a three-phase plan to eliminate the injustices that arise from Nevada’s current cash bail model.
Deliberation And Decision-Making Process In The Inter-American Court Of Human Rights: Do Individual Opinions Matter?, Ranieri L. Resende
Deliberation And Decision-Making Process In The Inter-American Court Of Human Rights: Do Individual Opinions Matter?, Ranieri L. Resende
Northwestern Journal of Human Rights
The work is focused on the adjudicatory nature of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and investigates its model of deliberation, considering three basic schemes: per curiam, seriatim and hybrid. In order to identify an institutional pattern, the importance of individual opinions is analyzed through the quantitative performance of each category of judge (ad hoc and regular), as well as each type of adjudicative activity (judgments and advisory opinions). The quantitative data is also useful to better understand the explicit assimilation of separate opinions to the core reasoning of future cases. As a result, it has been possible to identify …
Rwu Law: The Magazine Of Roger Williams University School Of Law (Issue 10, 25th Anniversary Issue) (May 2019), Roger Williams University School Of Law
Rwu Law: The Magazine Of Roger Williams University School Of Law (Issue 10, 25th Anniversary Issue) (May 2019), Roger Williams University School Of Law
RWU Law
No abstract provided.
Sentencing Persons Convicted Of Minor Offences In Ghana: Reducing Judicial Over-Reliance On Imprisonment, Nenyo Kwasitsu
Sentencing Persons Convicted Of Minor Offences In Ghana: Reducing Judicial Over-Reliance On Imprisonment, Nenyo Kwasitsu
LLM Theses
This thesis argues that there is overuse of imprisonment for minor offenders in Ghana. These are offenders whose punishments go up to 3 years of jail time, essentially offending mainly for reasons of material poverty. Statutory sentencing provisions have essentially limited judges to impose jail terms. It is argued that one way to decongest Ghana’s prisons is to consider the institutionalization of a regime of community service orders and probation, the administration of which would equip the offenders with income-earning skills while they also reform. Drawing on Kenya, a country that has achieved reasonable success in this reform effort, this …
Law Library Blog (May 2019): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Blog (May 2019): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Newsletters/Blog
No abstract provided.
Making The Invisible Visible: Exploring Implicit Bias, Judicial Diversity, And The Bench Trial, Melissa L. Breger
Making The Invisible Visible: Exploring Implicit Bias, Judicial Diversity, And The Bench Trial, Melissa L. Breger
University of Richmond Law Review
All people harbor implicit biases—which by definition, are not always consciously recognized. Although trial judges are specifically trained to compartmentalize and shield their decisions from their own biases, implicit biases nonetheless seep into judicial decision making. This article explores various strategies to decrease implicit bias in bench trials. Questions are then raised about whether a judge who has faced bias personally would be more amenable and more open to curbing implicit bias professionally. Ultimately, does diversifying the trial court judiciary minimize implicit bias, while also creating a varied, multidimensional judicial voice comprised of multiple perspectives? This article will explore this …
The “Vanishing Trial”: Arbitrating Wrongful Death, The Hon. Victoria A.B. Willis, Judson R. Peverall
The “Vanishing Trial”: Arbitrating Wrongful Death, The Hon. Victoria A.B. Willis, Judson R. Peverall
University of Richmond Law Review
Within the past four decades, private arbitration has spread apace across the American legal landscape. The “mass production” of arbitration clauses has pervaded modern business life, relegating a multitude of legal doctrines from the public courthouse into the private realm. The results have been both acute and invidious. Modern judicial preferences for arbitration have given way to enforcement in areas of the formerly unenforceable. Courts are now compelling new classes of claims, previously thought to be beyond the pale of any arbitration agreement.
The latest target in this expedition is the wrongful death action, with courts now shifting wrongful death …
Access Before Evidence And The Price Of The Fda’S New Drug Authorities, Erika Lietzan
Access Before Evidence And The Price Of The Fda’S New Drug Authorities, Erika Lietzan
University of Richmond Law Review
Sometimes drug innovation seems to happen in reverse. Patients enjoy a treatment for years even though the treatment has not been approved by the FDA or proven safe and effective to the FDA’s standards. (Sometimes this happens because the FDA has declined to take enforcement action.) The agency encourages companies to perform the work necessary to satisfy the United States “gold standard” for new drug approval, however, by promising exclusivity in the marketplace. When a company does this work, at considerable expense, the results are predictable. The new drug is expensive, and patients and payers (and sometimes policymakers) are outraged. …
Transitional Equality, Suzanne A. Kim
Transitional Equality, Suzanne A. Kim
University of Richmond Law Review
Legal discussions of inequality often focus on the virtues of one legal status or regulatory structure over another, but a guarantee of the right to a particular legal status does not ensure a lived experience of equality in that status. In moments of legal change, when a person or class of persons obtain a new status or gain rights that had previously been denied to them, the path from one legal status to another becomes critically important and may itself be impacted by race, gender, age, and other factors. The process of transitioning to a new status can be complex …
Preface, Kurt D. Lockwood
Preface, Kurt D. Lockwood
University of Richmond Law Review
We are proud to present the fourth volume of the Online Edition of the University of Richmond Law Review. In the proud tradition of our publication, we have once again sought to publish timely and relevant scholarship.
Acknowledgments, So Ra Ko
Acknowledgments, So Ra Ko
University of Richmond Law Review
I present the last book of Volume 53, the last in a series of four print issues the University of Richmond Law Review publishes throughout the academic year. Our publications would not have been possible without those who generously dedicated their time to this organization. As those before me, I take these first few pages of this final book to offer my gratitude to those who have contributed to the successes of the Law Review.
Silence Of The Liberals: When Supreme Court Justices Fail To Speak Up For Lgbt Rights, David S. Cohen
Silence Of The Liberals: When Supreme Court Justices Fail To Speak Up For Lgbt Rights, David S. Cohen
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1985, Justice Brennan did something that had never been done before and has, surprisingly, never been done again—penned a separate opinion from the Court’s left vigorously arguing for the protection of gay rights under the Constitution. Since then, even though the Court has repeatedly protected gay rights, none of the Court’s liberal Justices have said a word on the topic. Rather, the liberal Justices have ceded the territory on the issue of the Constitution and gay rights almost entirely to Justice Kennedy’s notoriously flowery but somewhat vacuous statements about the issue, as well as the pointed and often homophobic …
Eliminating Liability For Lack Of Informed Consent To Medical Treatment, Valerie Gutmann Koch
Eliminating Liability For Lack Of Informed Consent To Medical Treatment, Valerie Gutmann Koch
University of Richmond Law Review
The legal doctrine of informed consent, which imposes tort liability for failure to disclose the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a proposed medical intervention, is often criticized for emphasizing ritual over relationships, contributing to the deterioration of the doctor-patient relationship by encouraging the practice of defensive medicine. This article considers a rather radical response to the allegations that the tort of lack of informed consent does not serve the lofty goal of protecting patient self-determination by ensuring that treatment decisions are voluntary and informed, namely the elimination of liability for failure to provide informed consent to medical treatment. In doing …
Improving Lawyers’ Health By Addressing The Impact Of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Karen Oehme, Nat Stern
Improving Lawyers’ Health By Addressing The Impact Of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Karen Oehme, Nat Stern
University of Richmond Law Review
Although the legal profession has recognized the importance of improving attorneys’ mental health, it has largely ignored recent social and scientific research on how adverse childhood experiences (“ACEs”) can harm attorneys’ long-term well-being. This article reviews the science of ACEs and argues that law schools and the legal profession should educate law students and attorneys about the impact of prior trauma on behavioral health. Without such education, law schools and the legal system are missing a crucial opportunity to help lawyers prevent and alleviate the maladaptive coping mechanisms that are associated with ACEs. Until such knowledge is widespread, many lawyers …
Intellectual Property And Human Rights 2.0, Peter K. Yu
Intellectual Property And Human Rights 2.0, Peter K. Yu
University of Richmond Law Review
Written in celebration of the seventieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, this article calls for greater methodological engagement to refine existing human rights approaches to intellectual property and to devise new approaches to advance the promotion and protection of human rights in the intellectual property area. This article begins by briefly recapturing the past two decades of scholarship on intellectual property and human rights. It documents the progress scholars have made in this intersectional area. The article then draws on the latest research on human rights methods and methodology to explore whether and how we can take …
When The Problem Is The Solution: Evaluating The Intersection Between The U Visa “Helpfulness” Requirement And No-Drop Prosecution Policies, Diane Mickelson
When The Problem Is The Solution: Evaluating The Intersection Between The U Visa “Helpfulness” Requirement And No-Drop Prosecution Policies, Diane Mickelson
University of Richmond Law Review
When Congress introduced the U visa in 2000, it intended to create a program that not only protected immigrant victims of domestic violence from deportation, but also strengthened law enforcement’s ability to investigate crimes and encouraged victims to report the abuse. Traditionally, immigrant victims are particularly vulnerable to domestic violence and have been provided with few options to leave the relationship without risking their immigration status. However, while the U visa provides immigration protections to broad categories of victims, it contains a unique “helpfulness” requirement that compels victims to continually cooperate with law enforcement in order to receive the necessary …
Curating Campus Speakers, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
Curating Campus Speakers, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
Curation—the picking and choosing of materials for pedagogical reasons—regularly occurs on college campuses both inside and outside of the classroom. This brief essay explains that curation in two contexts. Part I discusses the curation of courses inside the classroom. Part II discusses the curation of campus speakers outside the classroom. Though applied to different topics, the process of curation is similar in both contexts. Considering both forms of curation can help illuminate and resolve some of the most important issues underlying the debate regarding controversial campus speakers.
The First Amendment And The Great College Yearbook Reckoning, Maryann Grover
The First Amendment And The Great College Yearbook Reckoning, Maryann Grover
University of Richmond Law Review
I advance my argument in three parts. In Part I, I discuss the law as it currently applies to student publications. I begin by briefly addressing the law as it applies to student publications in high schools as a way of demonstrating the lack of clarity in the law as it applies to student publications on college campuses. I then discuss the current state of speech regulation for student publications, including yearbooks, on college campuses. In Part II, I discuss each of the categories of unprotected speech as they are currently interpreted by the Supreme Court, and I demonstrate how …
Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Paid Parental Leave: How The United States Has Disadvantaged Working Families, Kate Miceli
Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Paid Parental Leave: How The United States Has Disadvantaged Working Families, Kate Miceli
University of Richmond Law Review
This article argues the critical need for the United States to pass a comprehensive paid parental leave program, specifically, the FAMILY Act, to support all families’ financial and caregiving needs and eliminate gender bias in the workplace. First, this article explains the current state of federal parental leave in the United States. Next, it details what an ideal parental leave policy should look like. Finally, it explores current paid parental leave options on the state level as well as proposed federal legislation.
Statutory Interpretation, Administrative Deference, And The Law Of Stare Decisis, Randy J. Kozel
Statutory Interpretation, Administrative Deference, And The Law Of Stare Decisis, Randy J. Kozel
Journal Articles
This Article examines three facets of the relationship between statutory interpretation and the law of stare decisis: judicial interpretation, administrative interpretation, and interpretive methodology. In analyzing these issues, I emphasize the role of stare decisis in pursuing balance between past and present. That role admits of no distinction between statutory and constitutional decisions, calling into question the practice of giving superstrong deference to judicial interpretations of statutes. The pursuit of balance also suggests that one Supreme Court cannot bind future Justices to a wide-ranging interpretive methodology. As for rules requiring deference to administrative interpretations of statutes and regulations, they are …
Ohio's Targeted Community Alternative To Prison Program: How A Good Idea Is Implemented Through Bad Policy, Samantha Sohl
Ohio's Targeted Community Alternative To Prison Program: How A Good Idea Is Implemented Through Bad Policy, Samantha Sohl
Cleveland State Law Review
Just because a legislature can make a law doesn’t mean that they should. The Ohio General Assembly enacted the Targeted Community Alternatives to Prison (T-CAP) program to decrease the number of convicted defendants sent to state prison and to increase funding for community control efforts. While the law may be upheld under the Ohio Constitution’s Uniformity Clause, the law should still be repealed because legislative control and financial influence have no place in the judicial branch, specifically the criminal sentencing process. However, the law is rooted in good intentions, and many judges have found the additional funding useful, but the …