Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (76)
- Supreme Court of the United States (72)
- State and Local Government Law (69)
- Constitutional Law (26)
- Legal History (21)
-
- Criminal Law (18)
- Jurisdiction (18)
- Law and Society (18)
- Criminal Procedure (17)
- Law and Politics (16)
- Civil Procedure (15)
- Jurisprudence (14)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (14)
- Administrative Law (13)
- Litigation (13)
- Housing Law (11)
- Legal Profession (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Social Welfare Law (10)
- International Law (9)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (9)
- Rule of Law (9)
- Civil Law (8)
- Family Law (8)
- Fourteenth Amendment (8)
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Human Rights Law (8)
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (50)
- UC Law SF (18)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (6)
- Pepperdine University (6)
-
- St. Mary's University (5)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Marquette University Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Cedarville University (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme court (8)
- Constitutional law (7)
- Court (7)
- New york (7)
- Constitution (6)
-
- Judges (6)
- State (6)
- Criminal law (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Federal (5)
- Supreme Court (5)
- U.S. Supreme Court case (5)
- City (4)
- Civil procedure (4)
- Criminal procedure (4)
- Double jeopardy (4)
- Due process (4)
- Appellate (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Court of appeals (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Mistrial (3)
- NAALJ (3)
- New york state constitution (3)
- Prejudice (3)
- Taney Court (3)
- United states constitution (3)
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (50)
- The Judges' Book (18)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (6)
- Arkansas Law Review (5)
-
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- Arbitration Brief (3)
- Marquette Law Review (3)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (3)
- Notre Dame Law Review (3)
- Child and Family Law Journal (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- St. Thomas Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Channels: Where Disciplines Meet (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Florida Law Review (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- IP Theory (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 156
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overwriting And Under-Deciding: Addressing The Roberts Court's Shrinking Docket, Meg Penrose
Overwriting And Under-Deciding: Addressing The Roberts Court's Shrinking Docket, Meg Penrose
SMU Law Review Forum
No abstract provided.
Religion In Judicial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis, René Reyes, Jessica W. Reyes
Religion In Judicial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis, René Reyes, Jessica W. Reyes
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case Of The Exemption Claimants: Religion, Conscience, And Identity, Steven D. Smith
The Case Of The Exemption Claimants: Religion, Conscience, And Identity, Steven D. Smith
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
"To The Person": Rfra's Blueprint For A Sustainable Exemption Regime, Tanner Bean
"To The Person": Rfra's Blueprint For A Sustainable Exemption Regime, Tanner Bean
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Ethics: A New Paradigm For A New Era, Charles G. Geyh
Judicial Ethics: A New Paradigm For A New Era, Charles G. Geyh
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
As the preamble to the Model Code of Judicial Conduct indicates, traditional notions of judicial ethics operate within a rule of law paradigm, which posits that the “three I’s” of judicial ethics—independence, impartiality, and integrity—enable judges to uphold the law. In recent decades, however, social science, public opinion, and political commentary suggest that appointed judges abuse their independence by disregarding the law and issuing rulings in accord with their biases and other extralegal impulses, while elected judges disregard the law and issue rulings popular with voters, all of which calls the future of the three I’s and judicial ethics itself …
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process Supreme Court Appellate Division
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Defying Mcculloch? Jackson’S Bank Veto Reconsidered, David S. Schwartz
Defying Mcculloch? Jackson’S Bank Veto Reconsidered, David S. Schwartz
Arkansas Law Review
On July 10, 1832, President Andrew Jackson issued the most famous and controversial veto in United States history. The bill in question was “to modify and continue” the 1816 “act to incorporate the subscribers to the Bank of the United States. This was to recharter of the Second Bank of the United States whose constitutionality was famously upheld in McCulloch v. Maryland. The bill was passed by Congress and presented to Jackson on July 4. Six days later, Jackson vetoed the bill. Jackson’s veto mortally wounded the Second Bank, which would forever close its doors four years later at the …
Overruling Mcculloch?, Mark A. Graber
Overruling Mcculloch?, Mark A. Graber
Arkansas Law Review
Daniel Webster warned Whig associates in 1841 that the Supreme Court would likely declare unconstitutional the national bank bill that Henry Clay was pushing through the Congress. This claim was probably based on inside information. Webster was a close association of Justice Joseph Story. The justices at this time frequently leaked word to their political allies of judicial sentiments on the issues of the day. Even if Webster lacked first-hand knowledge of how the Taney Court would probably rule in a case raising the constitutionality of the national bank, the personnel on that tribunal provided strong grounds for Whig pessimism. …
M'Culloch In Context, Mark R. Killenbeck
M'Culloch In Context, Mark R. Killenbeck
Arkansas Law Review
M’Culloch v. Maryland is rightly regarded as a landmark opinion, one that affirmed the ability of Congress to exercise implied powers, articulated a rule of deference to Congressional judgments about whether given legislative actions were in fact “necessary,” and limited the ability of the states to impair or restrict the operations of the federal government. Most scholarly discussions of the case and its legacy emphasize these aspects of the decision. Less common are attempts to place M’Culloch within the ebb and flow of the Marshall Court and the political and social realities of the time. So, for example, very few …
The Confusing Language Of Mcculloch V. Maryland: Did Marshall Really Know What He Was Doing (Or Meant)?, Sanford Levinson
The Confusing Language Of Mcculloch V. Maryland: Did Marshall Really Know What He Was Doing (Or Meant)?, Sanford Levinson
Arkansas Law Review
All legal “interpretation” involves confrontation with inherently indeterminate language. I have distinguished in my own work between what I call the Constitution of Settlement and the Constitution of Conversation. The former includes those aspects of the Constitution that do indeed seem devoid of interpretive challenge, such as the unfortunate assignment of two senators to each state or the specification of the terms of office of representatives, senators, and presidents. I am quite happy to concede that “two,” “four,” and “six” have determinate meaning, though my concession is not based on a fancy theory of linguistics. It is, rather, a recognition …
Mcculloch At 200, David S. Schwartz
Mcculloch At 200, David S. Schwartz
Arkansas Law Review
March 6, 2019 marked the 200th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s issuance of its decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, upholding the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States, the successor to Alexander Hamilton’s national bank. McCulloch v. Maryland involved a constitutional challenge by the Second Bank of the United States to a Maryland tax on the banknotes issued by the Bank’s Baltimore branch. The tax was probably designed to raise the Second Bank’s cost of issuing loans and thereby disadvantage it relative to Maryland’s own state-chartered banks. Marshall’s opinion famously rejected the Jeffersonian strict-constructionist argument that implied powers …
Raising The Bar: Law Clerks Pay Tribute To Judge Adkins, Monica Basche, Michael Collins Jr.
Raising The Bar: Law Clerks Pay Tribute To Judge Adkins, Monica Basche, Michael Collins Jr.
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Brief History Of Judicial Appointments From The Last 50 Years Through The Trump Administration, Donald F. Mcgahn Ii
A Brief History Of Judicial Appointments From The Last 50 Years Through The Trump Administration, Donald F. Mcgahn Ii
William & Mary Law Review Online
This is the transcript of a lecture Mr. McGahn delivered at William & Mary Law School on November 19, 2018.
Digital Realty, Legislative History, And Textualism After Scalia, Michael Francus
Digital Realty, Legislative History, And Textualism After Scalia, Michael Francus
Pepperdine Law Review
There is a shift afoot in textualism. The New Textualism of Justice Scalia is evolving in response to a new wave of criticism. That criticism presses on the tension between Justice Scalia’s commitment to faithful agency (effecting the legislature’s will) and his rejection of legislative history in the name of ordinary meaning (which ignores legislative will). And it has caused some textualists to shift away from faithful agency, even to the point of abandoning it as textualism’s grounding principle. But this shift has gone unnoticed. It has yet to be identified or described, let alone defended, even as academic and …
The Case Against Absolute Judicial Immunity For Immigration Judges
The Case Against Absolute Judicial Immunity For Immigration Judges
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality
A federal regulation states that immigration hearings shall be open to the public. Courts and scholars also have located a right to observe these proceedings in the First Amendment. And yet immigration judges (IJ) have excluded members of the press and other observers from hearings for no stated legal reasons, thus effectively eliminating public scrutiny of proceedings that affect millions of citizens and non-citizens in the United States. In response to a lawsuit pursuing monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief after an IJ ordered guards to remove a reporter from a federal building, an Eleventh Circuit panel held IJs have absolute …
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Slip Slidin' Away: The Erosion Of Apa Adjudication, William Funk
Slip Slidin' Away: The Erosion Of Apa Adjudication, William Funk
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Although the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) was intended to establish a uniform set of procedures applicable to adjudications "required by statute to be determined on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing," agencies have long sought to avoid those procedures, and, in particular, Administrative Law Judges, by substituting informal, non-APA adjudications. Over time, the courts have accelerated this substitution through a misapplication of three Supreme Court opinions. This article describes the original understanding of the APA and how that original understanding has been eroded over the years. The article then asks whether this is a problem …
Keynote Address: Staying Afloat And Engaged In Today's Flooded Marketplace Of Speech, Michael Y. Scudder
Keynote Address: Staying Afloat And Engaged In Today's Flooded Marketplace Of Speech, Michael Y. Scudder
Notre Dame Law Review
The contributions to this Symposium cover substantial ground, address important issues, and offer much to react to. This Symposium, I submit, also occurs at a time of significance for the First Amendment in the Supreme Court. Perhaps the Court’s most fervent and consequential defender of free speech, Justice Anthony Kennedy, has retired. His impact on American constitutional law was enormous, including, in my view, in the area of free speech. I had the privilege of clerking for Justice Kennedy, admire him deeply as judge and person, and want to offer some reflections on what I see as a few of …
Do Justices Time Their Retirements Politically? An Empirical Analysis Of The Timing And Outcomes Of Supreme Court Retirements In The Modern Era, Christine Kexel Chabot
Do Justices Time Their Retirements Politically? An Empirical Analysis Of The Timing And Outcomes Of Supreme Court Retirements In The Modern Era, Christine Kexel Chabot
Utah Law Review
As the rampant speculation preceding Justice Kennedy’s retirement made clear, it is difficult to predict when Justices will retire. Justices often defy the conventional wisdom that a Justice is more likely to retire when the president and Senate share the Justice’s ideology. For example, Justice Ginsburg chose to remain on the Court rather than retire during President Obama’s terms. Her choice is not unusual. Since 1954, a majority of similarly situated Justices refused to retire. In light of this behavior, it is no surprise that existing studies struggle to explain Justices’ retirement decisions and disagree on whether political factors predict …
Your Honor, On Social Media: The Judicial Ethics Of Bots And Bubbles, Katrina Lee
Your Honor, On Social Media: The Judicial Ethics Of Bots And Bubbles, Katrina Lee
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Filling The Ninth Circuit Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Filling The Ninth Circuit Vacancies, Carl Tobias
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Upon Republican President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit experienced some pressing appellate vacancies, which the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO) carefully identified as “judicial emergencies” because the tribunal resolves a massive docket. Last year’s death of the iconic liberal champion Stephen Reinhardt and the late 2017 departure of libertarian former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski—who both assumed pivotal circuit leadership roles over numerous years—and a few of their colleagues’ decision to leave active court service thereafter, mean the tribunal presently confronts four judicial emergencies and resolves most slowly the largest …
Justice Begins Before Trial: How To Nudge Inaccurate Pretrial Rulings Using Behavioral Law And Economic Theory And Uniform Commercial Laws, Michael Gentithes
Justice Begins Before Trial: How To Nudge Inaccurate Pretrial Rulings Using Behavioral Law And Economic Theory And Uniform Commercial Laws, Michael Gentithes
William & Mary Law Review
Injustice in criminal cases often takes root before trial begins. Overworked criminal judges must resolve difficult pretrial evidentiary issues that determine the charges the State will take to trial and the range of sentences the defendant will face. Wrong decisions on these issues often lead to wrongful convictions. As behavioral law and economic theory suggests, judges who are cognitively busy and receive little feedback on these topics from appellate courts rely upon intuition, rather than deliberative reasoning, to resolve these questions. This leads to inconsistent rulings, which prosecutors exploit to expand the scope of evidentiary exceptions that almost always disfavor …