Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (25)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Legal History (9)
- Litigation (8)
-
- Legal Profession (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Legal Biography (4)
- Legal Education (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Law and Philosophy (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Statistics and Probability (3)
- Applied Statistics (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- European Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of the Pacific (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (11)
- Supreme Court (5)
- Congress (4)
- Federal courts (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
-
- Appointment (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Court administration (3)
- Decision making (3)
- Federal government (3)
- Federal jurisdiction (3)
- Judiciary (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Roger J Miner (3)
- 1995) (2)
- American criminal justice system (2)
- Bill of Rights (2)
- Committee on Long Range Planning (2)
- Compensation (2)
- Constitutions (2)
- Defamation (2)
- Discretion (2)
- England (2)
- Federal (2)
- Federal Judiciary (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Hermeneutics (2)
- History (2)
- Judge Bellacosa (2)
- Judicial Conference of the United States (2)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Publications (4)
-
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Commencement Addresses (1)
- Court Conferences and Events (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Hon. Gerald Lebovits (1)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (1)
- Induction Ceremonies and Investitures (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Laurent Mayali (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 69 of 69
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Reflections Of Judicial Adr And The Multi-Door Courthouse At Twenty: Fait Accompli, Failed Overture, Or Fledgling Adulthood, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Reflections Of Judicial Adr And The Multi-Door Courthouse At Twenty: Fait Accompli, Failed Overture, Or Fledgling Adulthood, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Like any trend, ADR has its skeptics and even some opponents. Considerable debate exists regarding the degree to which the increasing ADRization of traditionally judicial activity amounts to triumph or tragedy, a point well-illustrated by the past Schwartz Lectures. In the 1993 Schwartz Lecture, Professor Laura Nader described the ADR movement as a byproduct of society's attempt to suppress or conceal uncomfortable conflicts. In the 1994 Lecture, Professor Judith Resnik essentially concluded that the modern ADR movement has brought a regrettable de facto closing of the court house (or at least raised barriers to entry) and replaced reflective decision-making about …
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
A plurality on the Supreme Court seeks to establish a state-sovereignty based theory of federalism that imposes sharp limitations on Congress's legislative powers. Using history as authority, they admonish a return to the constitutional "first principles" of the Founders. These "first principles," in their view, attribute all governmental authority to "the consent of the people of each individual state, not the consent of the undifferentiated people of the Nation as a whole." Because the people of each state are the source of all governmental power, they maintain, "where the Constitution is silent about the exercise of a particular power-that is, …
The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court At The Bar Of Mathematics, Paul H. Edelman, Jim Chen
The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court At The Bar Of Mathematics, Paul H. Edelman, Jim Chen
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
We analyze the relative voting power of the Justices based upon Supreme Court decisions during October Term 1994 and October Term 1995. We take two approaches, both based on ideas derived from cooperative game theory. One of the measures we use has been used in connection with voting rights cases. After naming the Most Dangerous Justice, we conclude by identifying and explaining the inverse relationship between seniority and voting power.
Judicial Selection In Michigan - Time For A Change?, John W. Reed
Judicial Selection In Michigan - Time For A Change?, John W. Reed
Articles
How are we to choose those who judge us? To whom do we entrust the responsibility of protecting our liberties and the power to determine our rights and liabilities? We look for men and women of integrity, diligence, legal ability, and judicial temperament, chosen by methods that balance judicial independence and public accountability.1
A Text Is Just A Text, Paul F. Campos
Fact-Bargaining: An American Phenomenon, William T. Pizzi
Fact-Bargaining: An American Phenomenon, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Politics And The Rehnquist Court, James F. Simon
Politics And The Rehnquist Court, James F. Simon
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Europäische Und Amerikanische Richterbilder, Laurent Mayali, Andre Gouron, Dieter Simon
Europäische Und Amerikanische Richterbilder, Laurent Mayali, Andre Gouron, Dieter Simon
Laurent Mayali
No abstract provided.
Derecho En La Era Digital, Horacio M. Lynch