Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (34)
- Constitutional Law (24)
- State and Local Government Law (15)
- Supreme Court of the United States (15)
- Jurisprudence (14)
-
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (9)
- Legal Education (8)
- Legislation (7)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Rule of Law (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (11)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
-
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (13)
- 1992) (10)
- Federal (10)
- Constitution (9)
- N.Y. Constitutional Article I (9)
-
- New York State (9)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Court of Appeals (8)
- Defendant (7)
- Judicial selection (6)
- U.S. Const. amend. IV (5)
- § 12 (5)
- Discretion (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Search & Seizure (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Violated (4)
- § 6 (4)
- Appellate Division (3)
- Constitutional interpretation (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Judge (3)
- Judiciary (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Police (3)
- Trial (3)
- American criminal justice system (2)
- Attorney (2)
- Civil Justice Reform Act (2)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (11)
- Publications (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Law Faculty Publications (6)
- Scholarly Works (5)
-
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Richard L. Aynes (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Student Newspapers (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 79 of 79
Full-Text Articles in Judges
"Taking" The Imperial Judiciary Seriously: Segmenting Property Interests And Judicial Revision Of Legislative Judgments, John A. Humbach
"Taking" The Imperial Judiciary Seriously: Segmenting Property Interests And Judicial Revision Of Legislative Judgments, John A. Humbach
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article examines the diversion of the Takings Clause from its historic limited role to that of a charter for courts to second-guess legislative determinations of land-use rights and wrongs. As we shall see, prior to Lucas the Supreme Court and others following its lead have generally not regarded the Takings Clause as a warrant for reaching de novo determinations on land use problems and then substituting such judicial determinations, if different, for those of the legislature. Some notable exceptions in the Claims Court and Federal Circuit will then be considered along with the ostensible Supreme Court authority, a sentence …
Mr. Justice Frankfurter's Iconography Of Judging, Alfred S. Neely
Mr. Justice Frankfurter's Iconography Of Judging, Alfred S. Neely
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Opinions As Binding Law And As Explanations For Judgments, Thomas W. Merrill
Judicial Opinions As Binding Law And As Explanations For Judgments, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
To what extent does the executive branch have autonomous powers of legal interpretation? The issue is often broadly framed in terms of two disparate understandings of the allocation of interpretative power: "judicial supremacy" and "departmentalism." In this paper, I shall speak of two different understandings of judicial opinions: the idea that judicial opinions (or at least the "holdings" of opinions) are legally binding on actors in the executive branch, and the idea that opinions are, from the perspective of executive actors, merely explanations for judicial judgments. I adopt this locution because it focuses more precisely on the core of the …
Chase Court And Fundamental Rights: A Watershed In American Constitutionalism, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Chase Court And Fundamental Rights: A Watershed In American Constitutionalism, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
Three weeks before he died in May 1873, the frail and ailing Salmon P. Chase joined three of his brethren in dissent in one of the most important cases ever decided by the United States Supreme Court, the Slaughter-House Cases.1 This decision was a watershed in United States constitutional history for several reasons. Doctrinally, it represented a rejection of the virtually unanimous decisions of the lower federal courts upholding the constitutionality of revolutionary federal civil rights laws enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War. Institutionally, it was an example of extraordinary judicial activism in overriding the legislative will of …
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion In The United States: The Limits Of Comparative Criminal Procedure As An Instrument Of Reform, William T. Pizzi
Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion In The United States: The Limits Of Comparative Criminal Procedure As An Instrument Of Reform, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Disagreement And Interpretation, Robert F. Nagel
Progressive Free Speech And The Uneasy Case For Campus Hate Codes, Robert F. Nagel
Progressive Free Speech And The Uneasy Case For Campus Hate Codes, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The Federal Administrative Judiciary: Establishing An Appropriate System Of Performance Evaluation For Alj's, Jeffrey Lubbers
The Federal Administrative Judiciary: Establishing An Appropriate System Of Performance Evaluation For Alj's, Jeffrey Lubbers
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Law Of Federal Judicial Discipline And The Lessons Of Social Science, Stephen B. Burbank, Sheldon Jay Plager
Foreword: The Law Of Federal Judicial Discipline And The Lessons Of Social Science, Stephen B. Burbank, Sheldon Jay Plager
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Prospective Overruling And The Revival Of ‘Unconstitutional' Statutes, William Michael Treanor, Gene B. Sperling
Prospective Overruling And The Revival Of ‘Unconstitutional' Statutes, William Michael Treanor, Gene B. Sperling
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey reshaped the law of abortion in this country. The Court overturned two of its previous decisions invalidating state restrictions on abortions, Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, and it abandoned the trimester analytic framework established in Roe v. Wade. At the time Casey was handed down, twenty states had restrictive abortion statutes on the books that were in conflict with Akron or Thornburgh and which were unenforced. In six of these states, courts had held the statutes unconstitutional. Almost …
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
I share with Fred Schauer the relatively unpopular belief that the positivist insistence that we keep separate the legal "is" from the legal "ought" is a logical prerequisite to meaningful legal criticism, and therefore, in the constitutional context, is a logical prerequisite to meaningful criticism of the Constitution. As Schauer argues, despite the modern inclination to associate positivism with conservatism, the positivist "separation thesis," properly understood, facilitates legal criticism and legal reform, not reactionary acquiescence. If we want to improve law, we must resist the urge to see it through the proverbial rose-colored glasses; we must be clear that a …
Specifying Grounds For Judicial Disqualification In Federal Courts., Leslie W. Abramson
Specifying Grounds For Judicial Disqualification In Federal Courts., Leslie W. Abramson
Faculty Scholarship
One essential component of equal justice under the law is a neutral and detached judge to preside over the court proceedings. Public confidence in the legal system is maintained when a judge has no interest in the parties, attorneys or subject matter of the litigation. Sua sponte or by motion of a party, a federal judge is subject to disqualification for conflicts of interest on both constitutional and statutory grounds
Adverse Publicity As A Means Of Reducing Judicial Decision-Making Delay: Periodic Disclosure Of Pending Motions, Bench Trials And Cases Under The Civil Justice Reform Act, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Informal Methods Of Judicial Discipline, Charles G. Geyh
Informal Methods Of Judicial Discipline, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.