Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Judges Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Journal

Judicial process

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication

Articles 1 - 30 of 36

Full-Text Articles in Judges

The Tort Whisperer: Nine Decades Later–My Perspective, Larry M. Roth Jan 2023

The Tort Whisperer: Nine Decades Later–My Perspective, Larry M. Roth

Touro Law Review

This Article provides a comparative analysis of Judge Benjamin Cardozo’s tort decisions in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., one of his most famous tort decisions, contrasted with a lesser-known tort opinion in Hynes v. New York Central Railroad Co. The Author attempts to address Cardozo’s humanistic and intellectual dichotomies which are exemplified by these two real-life tort precedents—one of which, Palsgraf, most practitioners may only have a distant recall. A historical overview of Cardozo’s life is also discussed. These two decisions portray Cardozo as an emotive human being exercising hit-or-miss judging. This theme provides a differ viewpoint from Cardozo’s …


Justice Benjamin Nathan Cardozo And His Two Most Important Questions: Reflections On The Choice Of Tycho Brahe, Randy Lee Jan 2018

Justice Benjamin Nathan Cardozo And His Two Most Important Questions: Reflections On The Choice Of Tycho Brahe, Randy Lee

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


One Judge's Legacy And The New York Court Of Appeals: Mr. Justice Cardozo And The Law Of Contracts, Meredith R. Miller Jan 2018

One Judge's Legacy And The New York Court Of Appeals: Mr. Justice Cardozo And The Law Of Contracts, Meredith R. Miller

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Antipodal Invective: A Field Gude To Kangaroos In American Courtrooms, Parker B. Potter Jr. Jul 2015

Antipodal Invective: A Field Gude To Kangaroos In American Courtrooms, Parker B. Potter Jr.

Akron Law Review

This article discusses three other groups of opinions that use the phrase “kangaroo court.” The first section describes the various decision-making behaviors that qualify a tribunal to wear the Scarlet K. It does so by discussing opinions in which a judge or a litigant has given a definition of the term “kangaroo court” when that term is used metaphorically, as invective, to disparage the fairness of another tribunal. The second section describes the habitat of adjudicatory kangaroos by examining opinions like Silver v. Castle Memorial Hospital, in which a judge has called another tribunal a kangaroo court. The third section …


Judge Posner's Simple Law, Mitchell N. Berman Apr 2015

Judge Posner's Simple Law, Mitchell N. Berman

Michigan Law Review

The world is complex, Richard Posner observes in his most recent book, Reflections on Judging. It follows that, for judges to achieve “sensible” resolutions of real-world disputes—by which Judge Posner means “in a way that can be explained in ordinary language and justified as consistent with the expectations of normal people” (p. 354)—they must be able to navigate the world’s complexity successfully. To apply legal rules correctly and (where judicial lawmaking is called for) to formulate legal rules prudently, judges must understand the causal mechanisms and processes that undergird complex systems, and they must be able to draw sound factual …


Law Clerks And The Institutional Design Of The Federal Judiciary, Albert Yoon Oct 2014

Law Clerks And The Institutional Design Of The Federal Judiciary, Albert Yoon

Marquette Law Review

This Essay highlights the evolving institutional changes in the federal judiciary—a protracted confirmation process, higher caseload demands, and declining real salaries—in concurrence with evidence suggesting greater reliance by judges on their law clerks when writing opinions. These dynamic forces arguably undermine the integrity of the judicial process and counsel for legislative action to address judicial working conditions or for changes by judges in the hiring of law clerks.


Who Writes? Gender And Judgment Assignment On The Supreme Court Of Canada, Peter Mccormick Jan 2014

Who Writes? Gender And Judgment Assignment On The Supreme Court Of Canada, Peter Mccormick

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

This article poses the question: Now that women are receiving an increasing share of the seats on the Supreme Court of Canada (the Court), can we conclude with confidence that they have been admitted to full participation, with a mix of judgments—including the more significant decisions—that is fully comparable to their male colleagues? The author looks at the assignment of reasons for judgment on the Court over the last three chief justiceships, with specific reference to the relative rate of assignments to male and female judges. He finds that the male/female gap is more robust than ever, although he also …


Judges Under Fire - Alj Independence At Issue, Debra Cassens Moss Apr 2013

Judges Under Fire - Alj Independence At Issue, Debra Cassens Moss

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


General Semantics, Stare Decisis And Change Through Considerations Of A New Ethics, Irene S. Ross Apr 2013

General Semantics, Stare Decisis And Change Through Considerations Of A New Ethics, Irene S. Ross

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


Surviving The Politics Of Judging: National Association Of Adminsitrative Law Judges Luncheon Address, September 13, 1999 , Penny J. White Apr 2013

Surviving The Politics Of Judging: National Association Of Adminsitrative Law Judges Luncheon Address, September 13, 1999 , Penny J. White

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


Ncalj Panel Discussion: Alj Decisions - Final Or Fallible?, Jim Flanagan, Jim Rossi, John Hardwicke, Tyrone T. Butler Apr 2013

Ncalj Panel Discussion: Alj Decisions - Final Or Fallible?, Jim Flanagan, Jim Rossi, John Hardwicke, Tyrone T. Butler

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


The Texas State Office Of Administrative Hearings: Establishing Independent Adjudicators In Contested Case Proceedings While Preserving The Power Of Institutional Decision-Making, Ron Beal Apr 2013

The Texas State Office Of Administrative Hearings: Establishing Independent Adjudicators In Contested Case Proceedings While Preserving The Power Of Institutional Decision-Making, Ron Beal

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


Policymaking By The Administrative Judiciary , Charles H. Koch Jr. Apr 2013

Policymaking By The Administrative Judiciary , Charles H. Koch Jr.

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


Accommodating Alj Decision Making Independence With Institutional Interests Of The Administrative Judiciary, Harold J. Krent, Lindsay Duvall Apr 2013

Accommodating Alj Decision Making Independence With Institutional Interests Of The Administrative Judiciary, Harold J. Krent, Lindsay Duvall

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


Active Bar Membership October 15, 2007 Federal Administrative Law Judges: A Critique Of The "Active" Bar Membership Regulation , David J. Agatstein Apr 2013

Active Bar Membership October 15, 2007 Federal Administrative Law Judges: A Critique Of The "Active" Bar Membership Regulation , David J. Agatstein

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.


Precedent: What It Is And What It Isn't; When Do We Kiss It And When Do We Kill It?, Ruggero J. Aldisert Jan 2013

Precedent: What It Is And What It Isn't; When Do We Kiss It And When Do We Kill It?, Ruggero J. Aldisert

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


"Was It Something I Said?": Losing The Majority On The Modern Supreme Court Of Canada, 1984-2011, Peter J. Mccormick Jul 2012

"Was It Something I Said?": Losing The Majority On The Modern Supreme Court Of Canada, 1984-2011, Peter J. Mccormick

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Appeal court judges do not just vote and run; they vote and then they explain, at length, why theirs is the most reasonable position. Since the core of explanation is persuasion, this means that between the initial conference vote and the final decision, some of the judges sometimes change their minds; and this in turn means that sometimes an initial majority becomes a minority and vice versa, something which often leaves clear footprints in the written record. This paper demonstrates that this happens more often than we might think—some 255 times for the last three Chief Justiceships, or roughly once …


The Rule Of Law For Judges, Thomas M. Reavley Apr 2012

The Rule Of Law For Judges, Thomas M. Reavley

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


"Of A Judiciary Nature": Observations On Chief Justice's First Opinions, Diane S. Sykes Mar 2012

"Of A Judiciary Nature": Observations On Chief Justice's First Opinions, Diane S. Sykes

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Roberts Court & Executive Power, Jeffrey Rosen Mar 2012

The Roberts Court & Executive Power, Jeffrey Rosen

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Alito/O'Connor Switch, Joan Biskupic Mar 2012

The Alito/O'Connor Switch, Joan Biskupic

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Inaugural William French Smith Memorial Lecture: A Look At Supreme Court Advocacy With Justice Samuel Alito, Samuel A. Alito Jr, Douglas W. Kmiec, Carter G. Phillips, Kenneth W. Starr Mar 2012

The Inaugural William French Smith Memorial Lecture: A Look At Supreme Court Advocacy With Justice Samuel Alito, Samuel A. Alito Jr, Douglas W. Kmiec, Carter G. Phillips, Kenneth W. Starr

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Law, Higher Law, And Human Making, William S. Brewbaker Iii Feb 2012

Law, Higher Law, And Human Making, William S. Brewbaker Iii

Pepperdine Law Review

This paper is a preliminary investigation of what Christian theology might teach us about the nature of human creative activity and its relationship to judging and lawmaking. Rather than attempt to survey and synthesize multiple theological accounts of human making, it focuses on just one - Dorothy Sayers' The Mind of the Maker. The foundational analogy that drives Sayers' account of human creativity is the relation between God's creative activity and that of human beings made in his image. Sayers argues that human creative activity has a Trinitarian structure, which she identifies as Idea, Energy and Power. These three elements …


Does Judicial Philosophy Matter?: A Case Study, Francisco J. Benzoni, Christopher S. Dodrill Jan 2011

Does Judicial Philosophy Matter?: A Case Study, Francisco J. Benzoni, Christopher S. Dodrill

West Virginia Law Review

A leading theory in the study of judicial behavior is the attitudinal model. This theory maintains that a judge's political ideology can be used to predict how a judge will decide certain cases; other factors, such as the judge's judicial philosophy, tend to be unimportant. Under this theory, two judges with the same political ideology, but different judicial philosophies, should virtually always vote the same way in cases with pre­dicted ideological outcomes. This manuscript tests the attitudinal model by examin­ing opinions by two judges with very similar political ideologies but different judicial philosophies: Judge Michael Luttig and Judge Harvie Wilkinson …


The Servant Of All: Humility, Humanity, And Judicial Diversity, Michael Nava Oct 2010

The Servant Of All: Humility, Humanity, And Judicial Diversity, Michael Nava

Golden Gate University Law Review

This article discusses how judicial diversity might increase qualities of humility and humanity on the bench. I close this section with two examples, the first involving two United States Supreme Court justices and the second a judge on the San Francisco Superior Court.


Judicial Independence: A Cornerstone Of Liberty: Golden Gate University School Of Law Jesse Carter Distinguished Speaker Series, Michael Traynor Oct 2010

Judicial Independence: A Cornerstone Of Liberty: Golden Gate University School Of Law Jesse Carter Distinguished Speaker Series, Michael Traynor

Golden Gate University Law Review

Constitution Day Lecture, September 18, 2006


Judicial Decision-Making And Judicial Review: The State Of The Debate, Circa 2009, Charles D. Kelso, R. Randall Kelso Jan 2010

Judicial Decision-Making And Judicial Review: The State Of The Debate, Circa 2009, Charles D. Kelso, R. Randall Kelso

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Judicial Philosophy: People-Oriented Justice, Larry V. Starcher Jan 2009

A Judicial Philosophy: People-Oriented Justice, Larry V. Starcher

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


American Citations And The Mclachlin Court: An Empirical Study, Peter Mccormick Jan 2009

American Citations And The Mclachlin Court: An Empirical Study, Peter Mccormick

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

This article examines the use of American jurisprudence by the judges of the McLachlin Court, using an earlier study of such citations as a reference point. In addition to tracking overall use of American citations over time, it looks at these trends: which Canadian judges use American cases and for which types of cases; and which American cases, courts, and judges are being cited. Brief descriptions of the Supreme Court cases with the largest use of American citations precede a categorization of the results. The article confirms previous academic findings that the use of American citations have been modest, with …


The Style Of A Skeptic: The Opinions Of Chief Justice Roberts, Laura Krugman Ray Jul 2008

The Style Of A Skeptic: The Opinions Of Chief Justice Roberts, Laura Krugman Ray

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.